Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: San Bernardino (CA) has defaulted on $10 million in bond payments
Reuters ^ | March 17, 2015 | Tim Reid

Posted on 03/19/2015 7:32:02 AM PDT by C19fan

The southern California city of San Bernardino has defaulted on nearly $10 million in payments on its privately placed pension bond debt since it declared bankruptcy in 2012, according to documents seen by Reuters.

In addition, the city has not negotiated with its bondholders since September, according to a person familiar with the stalled negotiations.

The missed payments illustrate the trend among cities in bankruptcy to favor payments to pension funds over bondholder obligations, which has increased the hostility between creditors and municipalities.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: debt; municipal; pensions
Can't wait for the first state to default. I think it a competition between Illinois and NJ.
1 posted on 03/19/2015 7:32:02 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

De-fault is in our stars, Brutus (with apologies to Shakespeare.)


2 posted on 03/19/2015 7:33:26 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Can’t wait to relocate to San Bernardino..it must be great to live there...


3 posted on 03/19/2015 7:33:55 AM PDT by BerniesFriend (Sarah Palin-"Lord knows she's attractive" says bitter Andrea Mitchell and the rest of the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I’ve heard that these pension defaults are on the horizon all over the country. I’ve heard that unfunded liabilities total into the hundreds of billions of dollars.

We’ve heard about real estate bubbles and stock market bubbles and such, but haven’t heard too many talk about the pension bubble which will burst. And it will burst, as so many baby boomer employees of these governments are retired and collecting benefits. Or will retire in the next 5 to 10 years.


4 posted on 03/19/2015 7:35:24 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Pensions are paid to people who worked for them

Bond holders know they are at risk when investing and seek out returns commensurate with that risk.


5 posted on 03/19/2015 7:39:47 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; expat_panama

I wouldn’t lend them one dime on an unsecured bond. They would have to put up a first deed of trust on a piece of property that I wanted or they could go pound sand. I don’t understand how the courts can put CALPERS ahead of everyone else. Any one who lends to a municipality is taking a horrible risk.


6 posted on 03/19/2015 7:46:02 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Close, but public pensions are paid for by taxation. The reason municipal bonds are rated the way they are is the municipality has the ability to raise taxes to meet their obligations. By failing to meet obligations when monies are available is unlawful, and immoral.

In this case, the municipality well outspent their incoming revenue. They are obligated to pay their creditors first, by law.

When companies go bankrupt (see the airlines), the pension obligation falls to the PBGC (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation), an agency of the US Govt. The PBGC then becomes liable for paying at least some portion of the pension.

When municipalities go bankrupt, they continue to collect taxes, though not at a rate to cover debts. They need to work with all creditors to reorganize their debt. But to just not make a payment is plain wrong.


7 posted on 03/19/2015 7:51:07 AM PDT by SpirituTuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

I don’t understand how the courts can put CALPERS ahead of everyone else.

They didn’t, the court gave them permission to give CALPERS a Big Haircut, the City decided to make CALPERS whole and give everyone else the haircut. There is a lawsuit on this already by some other bond holders.


8 posted on 03/19/2015 8:06:36 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

As there should be. They should have their ass handed to them.


9 posted on 03/19/2015 8:08:02 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Which is why they are headed back to bankruptcy, just like everyone said would happen if they continued to pay the very people that forced them into bankruptcy in the first place, Public Employee Unions.

Coming soon to a City near you


10 posted on 03/19/2015 8:17:44 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Pensions are paid to people who worked for them
Bond holders know they are at risk when investing and seek out returns commensurate with that risk.”

Yeah, but when they raid the whorehouse, they take the piano player too. PE pensions are due for a huge haircut. I mean after they screw the bond holders and still have no money, just who’s going to be next? Plus, here in CA (Stockton) the courts have already said that pensions can be cut in a municipal bankruptcy, so it WILL happen. Taxpayers are about done with overpaying PE’s both during their “working lives,” and in retirement.


11 posted on 03/19/2015 9:00:09 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

“I wouldn’t lend them one dime on an unsecured bond. They would have to put up a first deed of trust on a piece of property that I wanted or they could go pound sand. I don’t understand how the courts can put CALPERS ahead of everyone else. Any one who lends to a municipality is taking a horrible risk.”

CalPers has already been told by CA courts that they are going to have to get in line with other creditors in municipal bankruptcies.


12 posted on 03/19/2015 9:01:53 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Ill go with Illinois to be first, with NJ 6-8 months later


13 posted on 03/19/2015 9:29:26 AM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson