If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!Posted on 03/28/2015 9:56:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Ted Cruz is the candidate most likely to take our country from where it's arrived under the leadership of President Obama to where it should be - in the hands of "We the People." His authenticity and consistency are just two of the advantages he has over the rest of the field-in-waiting. He says what he means, he means what he says, and Washington knows it.
Expectedly, the knives are out against Sen. Cruz, and they're coming from both sides of the aisle. There's no doubt in my mind however, many of those knives will be dulled once the presidential debates begin. Critics have begun questioning Cruz's experience, intentions, judgment, likeability and overall appeal. However, if Sen. Cruz can persuade "establishment voters" of his electability, illustrate his in depth understanding of the separation of powers, communicate how silly it is to compare his tenure in the senate to that of President Obama's, and continue to stand against the progressive left who are determined to expand the powers of the federal government (particularly the executive branch) he could be America's last best hope.
The only thing worse than establishment politicians are establishment voters that habitually fill in the ballot for their party candidate no matter how many promises he or she breaks. Why? Because they don't want to see "their guy" from their party lose. Unequivocally they buy into the same old establishment arguments from the media and the parties themselves. For example: "he's unelectable," "he's too extreme" or "he doesn't have enough experience." The latter would be a valid argument if the country's moral decadence and federal deficits hadn't skyrocketed during the reign of experienced politicians.
I appreciate the executive experience that governors bring to a presidential race, but state politics are unlike Washington politics. Governors practice activism on behalf of their state; presidents should practice restraint for the betterment of their country. There's something to be said about a legislator that has operated in the belly of the beast and remained true to himself and his constituents. What makes Sen. Cruz unique is that he's well acquainted with arguing cases in front of the Supreme Court as Solicitor General. He did so nine times. He's shown courage, conviction and efficiency working within both the judicial and legislative arms of our federal government amounting to two-thirds of our government! Why shouldn't we believe he's capable to lead the executive branch?
It is a fact that Obama lacked executive experience. However, it's unfair to say his lack of experience is exclusively why America is in such disarray, and as a result, it's why we should only elect governors to the White House. The country is in bad shape because we have a president who doesn't believe in its founding, or our Constitution. His leanings are not partisan or political, rather they are ideological. Therefore, the decisions he's made -and I'd argue seeming lack of decisions- are consistent with his proclivity to root against the best interest of America.
On the other side of the spectrum stands Senator Cruz who believes in American Exceptionalism and constitutional originalism. I'm confident that a man with such convictions will make for a great president.
As far as electability is concerned, it never ceases to amaze me when voters on the right agree with elitists of the GOP who listen to left-wing pundits. All it takes to make the unelectable electable is your vote companied with a little retail politics. Those of us on the right get what we deserve when we allow the leftists in both parties to pick our candidates. Being informed about the candidates is more crucial than ever. As iron sharpens iron so will the debates sharpen our candidates' ability to frame their messages effectively. I suspect being a champion debater from Harvard, Sen. Cruz will have an edge on the others in the field.
I'm eager to see Sen. Rand Paul, Gov. Scott Walker, Gov. Bobby Jindal, Sen. Marco Rubio and even former Sen. Rick Santorum jump into the race. But, if you were to ask me today, "who is the candidate most likely to reclaim our Judeo-Christian heritage and right the wrongs that Republicans and Democrats alike have levied on our nation at the expense of our Constitution?" Hands down my answer would be presidential hopeful Sen. Ted Cruz.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
Looks like he has legs, Gee, Could it be?
Never forget the shyt that the media talked about Reagan. He was “too radical” and “unelectable” too. The GOP mucky-mucks hated him. Everyone tries to pretend differently, but I remember, oh yes I do.
Boehner, Mcconnell, McCain, Barbor, Rove, all the Party “leaders”... these people are shyt.
CRUZ or LOSE!Time for all the rest of the Republican field to withdraw- although that would be a tall order for Rand and Rubio and H(F)uckabee.
Same thing for Dole, McCain, Bush and Romney. I just couldn't get all jazzed about guys who I did not believe had my back, so to speak.
Ted Cruz is a solid candidate and he is making me want to work hard, just like when Ronald Reagan ran in 1984.
Fixed it for ya. You're welcome. 
Only one I’ve seen and heard with a backbone. It will take much more than rhetoric to take back this nation.
Ronald Reagan wasn’t electable either, until he was.
Some things about the author of this very well done article:
Carl Jackson was born and raised in Los Angeles, California by his mother and father until the age of 11 when his mother died unexpectedly of a chronic illness. Carl attempted to find his way as the youngest of six who were lost without the strength of their matriarch. He moved back and forth between L.A and Orlando, FL trying to find his way in life. With the help of family and friends he was introduced to hard work, faith and family values. However, as a struggling teen he wandered down the path of least resistance, finding himself jailed twice and with a child he had to fight to raise.
By the grace of God and insistence by his brother and friend, he attended an Evangelical church and found that there was a better way. Once he accepted Jesus Christ as his savior he began to develop a greater desire to understand who God is and why it mattered. He began to see that the cultural dependence on government promoted by the Democrat leaders among his community rejected dependence upon God. As he studied America’s history he discovered that despite America’s flaws, particularly slavery, God used our Founding Fathers to create our Constitution within the context of the Bible and world history. It’s divine and exceptional nature is undeniable.
It was during his newfound love for American history that he discovered the Democrat party perpetuated slavery, formed the KKK, and fought against the civil rights of minorities. With this hidden history Carl was launched on a journey to help people of all races and backgrounds discover facts of America’s true past, as well as realize the benefits of utilizing their God-given gifts and talents which far outweigh any benefit from a government subsidy or program.
— I like reading articles written by good men.... I think Carl Jackson turned out to be one of those good men.
~~ hat tip, Mr. Jackson.
If you cut out Cruz and paste in Reagan with the lamestream media, it’s 1979 all over again.
The next step: A “deal” brokered where the Establishment candidate is the VP, kinda like Reagan and Bush 41. Watch for that if Cruz looks likely.
Keep the Cruz posts coming.
BTTT
not only can Cruz win, he WILL win.
Correct you are my good sir!
All the above and must include the democrats such as Harry Reid, Durbin, etc. are all part of the ruling elite. That elite club value their personal power far more than the electorate. The Democrat elite and the Republican elite are the enemy of our Constitution. They both know what the Constitution is and what it means but have chose to ignor it in the pursuit of their personal power, they are evil.
The constitution is the document that protects us from their evil.
Ted Cruz is a constitutiolist and wants to be president not for fame nor glory. He wants to be president to return our great nation to its foundation based on the constitution.
There are a few personalities on fox who spew hatred for Cruz and it is personal yet without reason. They cite feelings Not what it is that Cruz did wrong, just nonsensical babble. Seventh grade level dissing
I will not vote for any one but Cruz. If they nominate anyone but Cruz no I will not vote for him
If we had Romney now it would be a majority dem senate with the GOP ushering in illegals under the cover of Dems Hillary would be swooshing into the wh No trey Gowdy discoveries and we’d be in for much more of this
Because it’s not BO —it’s that he has support. Hillary still has 40%. Support
I voted for Romney I voted for McCain. No. Not doing it
Tell Carl not to put all his eggs in one basket—yet.
“There’s something to be said about a legislator that has operated in the belly of the beast and remained true to himself and his constituents. “
DC corrupts and Cruz has proven he is not corruptible.
He proved that by not getting elected.
The electablity meme was generated by the GOP-E, and those following it are following the liberal GOP-E whether they admit it or not.
Cruz is the real deal, and not a liberal like Romney.
People don't want to vote for a liberal republican. Even liberal Romney.
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.