Posted on 03/30/2015 10:21:51 AM PDT by C19fan
Indiana Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Kevin Brinegar comments on SB 101, the Religious Freedom Restoration bill, becoming law today and the reaction to that:
“In our eyes, the law is entirely unnecessary. The reactions to it are not unexpected or unpredicted; passing the law was always going to bring the state unwanted attention.
"Yet we are optimistic that the public overall will continue to look to Indiana as a place to come to do business, attend a convention or enjoy a sporting event. Indiana has shown time and time again – whether it’s hosting the Super Bowl or working with companies to bring new jobs to the state – that it’s full of individuals and businesses who are truly welcoming and hospitable.
“Businesses are open for business and want to continue to serve customers in Indiana and throughout the country. That’s the message we are hearing from our members and want to communicate.”
(Excerpt) Read more at indianachamber.com ...
People with no children have more money to spend on entertainment which is a high profit business.
Let them rot.
Time for an underground economy.
Time for a different country. This one is hopelessly corrupt.
> Time for a different country. This one is hopelessly corrupt.
There’s no place left on earth that I know about.
This takes away political capitol that can be used to advance big business’s bottom line.
Morality? We doan need no steenking morality ... Not when there’s money involved.
Nigel Farage of the United Kingdom Independence Party described the modern system of government in the UK led by the PM David Cameron and the “Conservative Party” along with the other big parties as “Corporatism”, a conglomeration of “Big Government, Big Business and Big Banks”.
The debate over this religious freedom legislation is showing how the system in this country is pretty much the same with Republican Indiana legislative leaders today saying they want to amend the religious freedom legislation they recently passed.
That’s isexactly what the liberals said when conservatives wanted a marriage amendment to the Constitution after Texas v. Lawrence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.