Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pipeline company files suit against W.Va. landowners
REGISTER-HERALD ^ | Wednesday, April 1, 2015 | Tina Alvey

Posted on 04/03/2015 4:49:03 PM PDT by FewsOrange

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: TigersEye
Subdivisions? Fields? Ever been to West Virginia? lol

Yes I have, they have both. It isn't all mountains in every location.

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.4040786,-82.2959723,507m/data=!3m1!1e3

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.8794745,-80.6912265,4026m/data=!3m1!1e3

41 posted on 04/04/2015 2:48:53 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
This pipeline is buried.

How do you know that? The article doesn't say anything about it and you don't provide any proof either.

Well for starters I've worked in the industry for a few decades, I've been a lead engineer on several major pipelines have a decent understanding that all pipelines in the US are buried unless there is an extreme reason not to bury them.

Secondly, this isn't the only discussion about this pipeline. A little searching can provide some direct information.

http://mountainvalleypipeline.info/

The pipeline, a joint venture of EQT Corp. and NextEra Energy, would transport natural gas at high pressure from West Virginia through a buried, 42-inch-diameter steel pipe.

http://www.roanoke.com/news/local/giles_county/mountain-valley-pipeline-considers-alternative-routes/article_d2e79f0c-63ce-546b-93b0-f924f65b0d77.html

I've been involved in preliminary planning and permitting of US pipeline, mostly Natural Gas like this one. This one isn't unique and different.

42 posted on 04/04/2015 3:00:37 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: thackney
It isn't all mountains in every location.

It is in all the counties listed for the project.

43 posted on 04/04/2015 3:01:42 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: thackney
As currently planned, the pipeline will be up to 42 inches in diameter and will require approximately 75 feet of permanent easement (with 125 feet of temporary easement during construction).

No, that certainly wouldn't lead to...

"The breadth and length of a pipeline might take 80% to 90% of some properties. Not everyone owns 1,000+ acres."

44 posted on 04/04/2015 3:05:19 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I've shown that the pipeline is buried, the owner of the land retains the land. The easement will limit the future use, just like all pipelines, which is why owners get paid for the easement, just like a power line, water line etc.

What is your objection at this point?

45 posted on 04/04/2015 3:07:16 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: thackney
I never said I had an objection to it. In fact I said the opposite.
46 posted on 04/04/2015 3:09:43 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"The breadth and length of a pipeline might take 80% to 90% of some properties.

Perhaps you will find some undeveoped small land that might be the case. But they won't install up against someone home, the footage separation requirements would prevent that.

47 posted on 04/04/2015 3:09:50 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

You post rather confusing comments.

You have a good night, Happy Easter and God Bless.


48 posted on 04/04/2015 3:10:54 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Finally a relevant response.


49 posted on 04/04/2015 3:11:01 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: thackney

My comments aren’t confusing, you just aren’t half as bright as you think you are.


50 posted on 04/04/2015 3:11:44 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson