Rush Limbaugh: ISIS Attacks, CNN Blames Victim

http://pamelageller.com/ ^ | May 4 2015 | Rush Limbaugh

[FR_addict]

Common sense from Rush Limbaugh. Free speech is under attack from the mainstream media, and thank God that Rush is there to call them out on it. Listen to this segment here. “ISIS Attacks, CNN Blames Victim,” Rush Limbaugh, May 4, 2015 BEGIN TRANSCRIPT RUSH: We have the ISIS shooting in Garland, Texas, to deal...

[FR_addict]

video at source. Rush does a great job attacking the media. But it's not only CNN. O'Reilly went after Pamela too.

I picked Pamela Geller's site to show this video of Rush because she needs to be recognized for her bravery. She has the cartoon up and ISIS has specifically targeted her.

[cripplecreek]

The only terrorist group these moron failures were connected to is islam.

[Fido969]

No complaint from the lefties about the Brown/Wilson “hands up don’t shoot” demonstrations which led to the murders of several police officers.

That “free speech” is OK by them.

[HLPhat]

 ISIS has specifically targeted her.

Assuming dominion over the spirituality and voice of others has always been Islam's, as well as other religious state-establishment's,  forte.

"...who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time;

 

...

 

 that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. "

 

"I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"

--The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
--Thomas Jefferson, 1786

https://www.google.com/webhp?#q=truth%20is%20great%20and%20will%20prevail%20if%20left%20to%20herself

 

[GOPJ]

Thanks Rush...

[FR_addict]

“No complaint from the lefties about the Brown/Wilson “hands up don’t shoot” demonstrations which led to the murders of several police officers.
That “free speech” is OK by them.”

That’s an excellent point.

[FR_addict]

It’s okay for Al Sharpton to incite violence.

[FR_addict]

I really like this part of Rush’s monologue:

“...Okay, fine. If Americans are to respect and obey the laws of Islam, that prohibit the drawing of pictures of Mohammed, then why wouldn’t Americans have to respect and obey Islam’s laws and punishments regarding gays and women? I mean, if it’s that important to them, who are we to disagree? If they say you can’t draw pictures of the prophet, we say you’re right, we can’t, and anybody that does, why, they’re gonna get what’s coming to them. Now, you move over to other aspects of militant Islam, and we know what happens to homosexuals in Iran or any other Islamic country. We know what happens to women. Well, if we’re gonna respect and obey the laws about drawing cartoons of the prophet, don’t we have to respect what Islam says about homosexuality and women? Where do we draw the line? We say, “Nah-nah, we can ignore that.” But this picture business, nope, we gotta follow that to the letter of the law. We gotta follow that to the letter of Islam. We gotta follow that to the letter of Allah. But the gay and women thing, not so much...”

http://pamelageller.com/2015/05/rush-limbaugh-isis-attacks-cnn-blames-victim.html/#sthash.q6cQqgcz.dpuf

[728b]

O’Reilly and Laura Ingram.

I say they are dead to me now. I will never listen to anything they have to say. I will never again tune into Ingram or O’Reilly. (At least I’m not advocating killing them because their speech offends me.)

But, in truth they can have no complaint against me or others that follow me in my boycott of their programs and appearances. After all they knew their position (speech) would offend some of us. You see, it their fault for inciting me to boycott.

[Rad_J]

Are there any polls from the liberal media showing the percentage of people who support Pamela Geller’s free speech? If not, why not? They love polls.

[Fido969]

Well, I'm listening to Megyn Kelly arguing with a leftie last night, and she's using a Supreme Court decision to supposedly bolster her point, when it isn't about the legality of the matter at all. It was excruciating.

It's about the hypocrisy - lefties use inflammatory rhetoric and actions all the time - but the only time they have a problem with “free speech” is when it is conservative ideas.

[PoloSec]

Picking Pamela’s site is most appropriate, she needs our support and hits on her site will demonstrate appreciation for her boldness in the face of islamic force.

islam means submission it appears across the board gov’t, media, academia, entertainment et al are all to willing too submit to the koran and it tenets of sharia law.

[GOPJ]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-releases-abhorrent-sex-slaves-pamphlet-with-27-tips-for-militants-on-taking-punishing-and-raping-female-captives-9915913.html

Question 1: What is al-sabi?

“Al-Sabi is a woman from among ahl al-harb [the people of war] who has been captured by Muslims.”

Question 2: What makes al-sabi permissible?

“What makes al-sabi permissible [i.e., what makes it permissible to take such a woman captive] is [her] unbelief. Unbelieving [women] who were captured and brought into the abode of Islam are permissible to us, after the imam distributes them [among us].”

Question 4: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive?

“It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with the female captive. Allah the almighty said: ‘[Successful are the believers] who guard their chastity, except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then they are free from blame [Koran 23:5-6]’...”

Question 5: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive immediately after taking possession [of her]?

“If she is a virgin, he [her master] can have intercourse with her immediately after taking possession of her. However, is she isn’t, her uterus must be purified [first]…”

Question 6: Is it permissible to sell a female captive?

“It is permissible to buy, sell, or give as a gift female captives and slaves, for they are merely property, which can be disposed of [as long as that doesn’t cause [the Muslim ummah] any harm or damage.”