Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So evading government scrutiny is a crime. Why?
Hotair ^ | 06/03/2015 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 06/03/2015 11:41:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 06/03/2015 11:41:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Some call it skirting the boundaries of propriety..

Others see it as exacting justice..

I see a lot of fat mattresses in politicos futures here on out.

Banks are quasi gubamental organisms.. And bound by law to same.


2 posted on 06/03/2015 11:45:01 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why? Because we let them. When these laws started, we could have stood up and stopped it, but as usual, we said “Hell, they’re just doing to those other people, so I don’t care”.


3 posted on 06/03/2015 11:46:09 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

RE: Why? Because we let them. When these laws started, we could have stood up and stopped it

Well, there is always a need for someone like rand Paul in the senate after all (even when he isn’t my choice to be President ).


4 posted on 06/03/2015 11:47:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Refusing to let the cops into your home without a warrant is “avoiding government scrutiny”.


5 posted on 06/03/2015 11:50:27 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I read that Hastert voted for this when he was in the house. that sucks for him.


6 posted on 06/03/2015 11:50:51 AM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

RE: I read that Hastert voted for this when he was in the house. that sucks for him.

Yep, it’s called being hoisted by your own petard.


7 posted on 06/03/2015 11:51:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The problem is that people think that their money is their money. Not so fast, comrade.
Anybody who sings the national anthem is a liar. Not the land of the free. And the home of cowards who are afraid to live life without the nanny state.


8 posted on 06/03/2015 11:51:34 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

structuring financial transactions “to evade currency transaction reporting requirements” is a violation of federal law.


This is right up there with asset forfeiture as absurd government overreach.

If you own a business that deals in a lot of cash and gross under $10k a day to the tune off $8500 one day, $9800 another, etc. you may find yourself in trouble for the appearance of evading currency transaction reporting requirements.

Add to this the fact that when this was enacted you could have bought MULTIPLE new cars for under that amount of money you see the challenges inflation has brought to the issue.


9 posted on 06/03/2015 11:54:32 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What if the government installed surveillance cameras on various streets in a municipality and then made it a crime to walk along a route that skirted those cameras?


Excellent analogy to point out the absurdity of the law.


10 posted on 06/03/2015 11:55:54 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

What if the government installed surveillance cameras on various streets in a municipality and then made it a crime to walk along a route that skirted those cameras?

No problem,,wear burqua, topped off by a sombrero


11 posted on 06/03/2015 12:01:01 PM PDT by Einherjar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s because you are their subject and tax slave rather than them being your public servant. Simple really.


12 posted on 06/03/2015 12:01:19 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

It creates a problem for Smaritan.


13 posted on 06/03/2015 12:02:15 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, when I transfer funds in excess of 10K, it is to write a check to the effing government for taxes. Now, where does that leave me? D@mned if I do, and D@mned if I don’t.


14 posted on 06/03/2015 12:02:41 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

He helped expand it under the PATRIOT Act, but the Bank Secrecy Act was passed into law in 1970.


15 posted on 06/03/2015 12:05:21 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because we let them get away with making it so. While the unmitigated support for the Patriot Act was rampant, equally abysmal laws were passed before it.

They keep us scared and rely on a bumper sticker mentality. If we are survive, it will take a clean slate of Representatives and a repeal of many a law.


16 posted on 06/03/2015 12:14:04 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

MOST small retail businesses make daily deposits of less than $10,000.

Often it is at the SUGGESTION OF THE BANK, to avoid the paperwork.

This “structuring” “law” has become a fund raising scheme for government agencies, and it has NOTHING to do with fighting crime.

You see, there is risk in fighting criminals....and why do that?


17 posted on 06/03/2015 12:15:48 PM PDT by G Larry (Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Look here the deal... a government employee with a security clearance was being blackmailed and he hid it....that is a crime...what if it was a foreign power blacking for information or a corporation looking for inside info or a vote?...

A government employee or elected official with clearance do not have a right to hide being blackmailed

If he wanted to pay the hush money.. quit the government, surrender your clearance....and become a private citizen

they he can pay all the hush money out he pleases and I'll support him in his right to do so with no one sticking their nose into it

18 posted on 06/03/2015 12:20:12 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Try buying a car with cash.

An old farmer I know did, and the cops showed up a few minutes later. He had bought cars with cash for decades.

It is now illegal to use cash, or not finance large purchases.


19 posted on 06/03/2015 12:22:32 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

Anybody that has dealt with clearances and working for the government knows their number one concern is your finances they do not want to see you in a position to be compromised

They do not want to see you being able to be blackmailed .

you want those positions of power and access to security information you give up certain privileges of privacy

give up your positions of power and you can get back your right and privileges of privacy..eventually....because you still hold that knowledge after you leave ..

same reason that Hillary Clinton cannot have her own private email server as Secretary of State

if she wants to be a private citizen she can have her own damn private email server.

quit looking at this as he was Joe Blow private citizen... it’s not the case.

I gave up a chance for job with a top security clearance out in that airbase in Nevada desert that does not exist.....

And I did not take the opportunity in part because I wanted to retain my rights as a private citizen to do things like even post on this freaking board


20 posted on 06/03/2015 12:33:35 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson