“the woman who used to be Bruce Jenner”
A crossdressing male is not normal.
Leftists always reject God and His absolutes of right & wrong.
To leftists, “normal” is relative and situational.
So, Clarence....did you ever go to church with Bill Clinton? How about Al Sharpton, or Jesse Jackson? How about Calypso Louie?
Caitlyn Jenner is not a woman. Check the chromosomes.
Also, women don’t have a penis.
10,000 people calling a cow a horse won’t make it so.
Whether Bruce, or whether Caitlyn, the proper term seems to be “the defendant”.
I am HTML challenged this am. Can’t get it to post on FR.
The best way to get attention is to write a column about Rush......I hope Rush ignores him.
—have notified the admin—author is Leonard Pitts, not Clarence Page-—my apologies—
No wonder she is so confused. Look where she learned about Jesus. I didn’t bother to go on and discover what she learned and I doubt that she did, either. I suspect that what she learned was Jesus can be the white version of “The Race Card”. “In trouble, need help? Just throw down your Jesus card and Voila, Saved”. (It is sort of like this “period, end parentheses thing on this bloody IPad. You just can NOT get it to work the way it is supposed to. So we have to pretend that “. is right even though we all know it is not. It ain’t right but it works so just move on.)
It is not Jesus whom Clarence should be referencing...Clarence is more closely following satan on this.
To liberals, "male" has become yet another flexible word that means whatever they want it to mean at that moment. "Male" describes actions and feelings, so many of the most attractive girls I've known in real life and seen on TV/movies - tomboys - were what liberals would call "male". To them, my prom date was "male" most of the day, as we crawled through mud catching crawdads, and then she became female as she showered (I missed that transition, obviously), fixed her hair and nails for hours, and dressed up in a beautiful and feminine but practical dress. The next day, they would see her as "male" again as we went shooting.
I'm not sure whether liberals are crazy, like Humpty Dumpty, evil like Big Brother's enforcers in 1984, or both, but they are double plus ungood for our children. Only a fool allows leftists to have access to the innocent.
Jenner’s actions are not a matter of normal or not-normal. Call it what it is: SIN.
We Christians (probably Limbaugh included) recognize we are sinners and ask for mercy.
Jenner and the rest of the LGBT movement proclaim their sin as good, and teach others to sin also.
We can’t and don’t argue over what is “normal”. We can only pray for them, and for ourselves, because eternal souls are in the balance here.
This article’s author isn’t Clarence Page, it’s Leonard Pitts Jr.
To respond to Claire/Leonard’s ‘point’ that Rush Limbaugh is not “normal”, Rush would likely agree.
He calls company EXCELLENCE in broadcasting, not mediocrity in broadcasting. He worked in different trades before striking gold in talk radio.
If you want to look for “average” (being a young Japanese girl in Tokyo, I suppose based on population density of the world and age demographics) that is something else.
But if you sum up shared beliefs, shared life accomplishments, etc. then you might be more on track to what Rush was discussing. Being an Olympic medal winner is NOT normal, but it is not immoral or aberrant psychology.
Alright, I confess. I clicked the link. I HAD to because that teaser that claimed she was going to apply principles made me intolerably curious. I just HAD to see if a libtard could do it, knowing that if one has no principles it would be on the order of Aegean Stables kind of thing. Waste of time. She couldn’t. Expecting a libtard to apply logic is “expecting what never has been or will ever be”.
Tribune circling the drain, Clarence has a contract coming due.
Is it “normal” to call a guy, with the balls and bat that God gave him still firmly attached, a “woman”. If so, I am not normal either.
A perv is a perv is a perv!