Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton to Tout Profit Sharing As A Way To Reduce income Disparity
LA Times ^
| July 13, 2015
| Evan Halper
Posted on 07/13/2015 5:00:26 AM PDT by lbryce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: lbryce
Profit sharing doesn't need government intrusion.
Government intrusion means politicians/bureaucrats picking winners and losers, with their dismal past history.
Another epic fail from 'the world's smartest woman'.
21
posted on
07/13/2015 5:29:01 AM PDT
by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: lbryce
Share your OWN extorted “profits” first, Hillary Rotten you jerk!
22
posted on
07/13/2015 5:31:21 AM PDT
by
alstewartfan
(If I should live to be seven I might forget Stephanie. Al Stewart)
To: Gaffer
Lol. Yeah.That’s an old Communist joke.
23
posted on
07/13/2015 5:31:47 AM PDT
by
lbryce
(OBAMA:Misbegotten, GodForsaken, bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa)
To: lbryce
"From each according to his ability ..."
To: lbryce
She’s needs to come out of the closet and openly adopt the hammer and sickle logo for her campaign.
25
posted on
07/13/2015 5:35:36 AM PDT
by
econjack
(I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
To: lbryce
We already have profit sharing. Its called “Stocks”.
But of course that also involves risk sharing, which the Democrats have no interest in.
26
posted on
07/13/2015 5:37:32 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: lbryce
New Idea:
How about conservative sanctuary cities in Texas or North Carolina, where state resources cannot be used in order to enforce federal tax capital gains tax or estate tax..?
27
posted on
07/13/2015 5:39:05 AM PDT
by
gaijin
To: lbryce
Hillary is a child of the discredited and forgotten 30’s.
her staff is no better. They live the lives of those now dead and gone
28
posted on
07/13/2015 5:39:30 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
To: gaijin
And more affirmatively - state and county resources, ie, the elected Sheriff,
will defend the citizenry from federal enforcement.
29
posted on
07/13/2015 5:40:40 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: lbryce
Profit sharing:nothing is preventing employees from buying stock in their own company.
30
posted on
07/13/2015 5:40:49 AM PDT
by
DaxtonBrown
(http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: rbg81
“I think she is hinting at one of two things:”
______________________________________________________________________________
How about a third option from the Beast....
3. Giving the higher taxes on businesses and wealthy individuals to those on welfare or to those below a threshold income....
To: InterceptPoint
Excellent work,comrade. For your contribution to the CCCP, you and your family are entitled to one visit per household member to Lenin's Tomb, which is of course now bereft of what was once the Worker's Paradise showpiece of Lenin's annually embalmed carcass. That along with the CCCP has also been relegated to the dustbin of history.
.Zero is quite jealous.
32
posted on
07/13/2015 5:52:01 AM PDT
by
lbryce
(OBAMA:Misbegotten, GodForsaken, bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa)
To: lbryce
I am sure when times are tough they will be happy to see their wages cut when there are no profits.
33
posted on
07/13/2015 5:53:51 AM PDT
by
Adder
(No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
To: lbryce
LOL! Yeah. Her “Foundation” pulls in hundreds of millions a year which she “shares” with her husband and daughter.
34
posted on
07/13/2015 5:54:30 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: lbryce
Hillary:
How about cattle futures for everyone?
35
posted on
07/13/2015 5:56:49 AM PDT
by
kidd
To: lbryce
But in the 1980’s the law was changed and companies were prohibited from giving ESOP’s as a bonus to all employees. Those things were then reserved for the executive suite.
36
posted on
07/13/2015 5:57:53 AM PDT
by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: Adder
For 'profit sharing' to work, "losses sharing" must also be implemented. As was with the old Marxist ideology, they had losses and followed through on the principle, sharing the losses across "Paradise" and then the Wall came tumbling down.
37
posted on
07/13/2015 6:00:16 AM PDT
by
lbryce
(OBAMA:Misbegotten, GodForsaken, bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa)
To: lbryce
38
posted on
07/13/2015 6:01:50 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Eat a snickers...)
To: lbryce
We need new ideas,
Hillary...
I’m still partial to the “old” ideas. You know, like the one where the supervisor gets fired (or jailed) for allowing four of her employees to die due to HER gross incompetence?
39
posted on
07/13/2015 6:07:33 AM PDT
by
moovova
To: MulberryDraw
I personally don’t have a problem encouraging employers to do this. I worked for a small 5 person engineering firm and was responsible for generating over $600K in fees to the company in one year. My bonus was $125!
40
posted on
07/13/2015 6:14:21 AM PDT
by
shotgun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson