Posted on 07/16/2015 9:03:10 AM PDT by AJFavish
Ari Yashar of Israelnationalnews.com reports that the Iran nuclear agreement negotiated by President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry requires the United States and the other non-Iranian signatories to provide “co-operation through training and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to protect against, and respond to nuclear security threats, including sabotage.” If Israel is about to take military action against Iran’s nuclear weapons infrastructure and related targets, will the Obama administration use this language in the agreement to claim that the United States is required to warn Iran of the impending attack and provide Iran with sufficient information to thwart it?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Not Iran, just Muslims and anti-Jewish/USA partners in general
0bviously, 0bama favors any policy that Destroys Western Civilization.
I can’t tell whether he prefers either form of Islam over Communism or vice versa.
But clearly, he wants all Christian, Jewish, Rational, Scientific, Just, or Free people DEAD.
Is Valerie Jarrett Iranian?
What the hell is so confusing?
Consider, Obama may well expect...and secretly want...the Israeli’s to strike.
If the Iranians were really close to nukes, do you think Obama would want to be at the negotiating table when to first Iranian nuke test goes off.
With that Obama knows the media will dutifully praise him. (WIN for Obama)
If that above is true. Obama knows the Israeli’s might well take matters into their own hand, conducting an air strike that will set Iran back years. Obama will condemn this air strike. ( WIN for Obama)
With the Israeli air strike, the particulars of deal will no longer matter. Obama and the media will decry that Obama’s deal was...never given a chance. ( WIN for Obama’s martyr complex)
With all that Obama will punish Israel which is high on his agenda. ( WIN for Obama)
Otherwise, what if, Israel doesn’t strike. Is this deal soo sweet because the unspoken agreement is Iran has agree not to test a nuke. ie: Obama to Iran: listen you can have it, just don’t test or acknowledge it (like Israel’s policy, no tests, never acknowledged). (WIN for Obama)
Youuuuuuu
Betcha!
We need a president who has America’s interests in mind and at hand.
Does Obama have Iran’s back?
In a word, yes.
Yup, she shore is. And I want to know why there isn’t a big issue being made of the way the talks went, the concessions and the fact that she is Iranian and his primary advisor.
He already has said he has Muslim backs. This is while he celebrates the persecution of Christians and let’s them languid in Iranian jails while freeing terrorists.
Well, we know that, from his kneeling position, he has Iran’s front.
“Obama is a socialist. He wants everyone equal.”
Sure he does. That’s why he worked on Pig Commune #36 and plays golf all the time.
“Obama is a Moslem. He wants to help his Moslem buddies.”
Sure he is. He’s an alcohol drinking, church going Moslem, just like all of them.
Obama is a greedy con man. That is his history. He takes care of himself.
The con man never tells you he is a con man. He leads you to believe that he is something else.
That way, you don’t think about what he is and what he’s truly doing.
Obama is a stinking con man and our enemies caught him and now they are blackmailing him.
If we had a real Justice Department, he’d be behind bars.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.