Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Scott Walker must be our next president
World Net Daily ^ | August 9, 2016 | Lord Monckton

Posted on 08/09/2015 3:15:11 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 next last
To: caww

Who is your candidate?


141 posted on 08/10/2015 9:45:37 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

Comment #142 Removed by Moderator

To: caww
Some are conveniently brushing aside reports that Walker tried to hire Dayspring directly 3 months before the Pac hired him. He declined at that time because he really wanted to work for Bush. When no one else made an offer he went to Walker.

LINK to Breitbart

143 posted on 08/10/2015 10:01:03 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: sf4dubya
....”you should explain why you feel it’s wrong for conservatives to work with one another”...

You really can't figure that out?

This is ‘a race’ for others choice of a nominee as much as it is for yours..........and if you're going to knock people's “Brains” for considering someone else then expect the like in return when you start thrashing other peoples horses with your stick.

You remind me of people who lay it on and then when put in their place with facts and figures wiggle around until cry out..”Let's all just get along”.

There's a lot at stake in this nominee election and I don't want someone who is not only squishy in his positions...but has his hand in the GOP and Karl Roves pocket in order to twerk his way to the Whitehouse.

144 posted on 08/10/2015 10:02:40 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: sf4dubya

...”I rescind that olive branch to you”....

So what....I’m not interested in the branch you’re extending which resorts to name calling and condesending remarks to posters and their choice of a candidate ...no thank you...it’s not a branch I care to grasp.

Walker will be vetted and flushed out more and more and you need to be open to the truth regarding him.


145 posted on 08/10/2015 10:09:43 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
Walker is quietly surrounding himself with establishment hacks...(birds of a feather and all)....besides that ... he was willing to endorse a path to citizenship for illegals ‘ as recently as two years ago, when he was already considering his run....I don't by his excuse for changing that position and in fact believe if elected he will indeed have a path to amnesty.....

Wisconsin is the place he needs to remain in IMO... as mentioned...In Wisconsin, he was the anti-RINO, Outside of Wisconsin he looks to be becoming RINO..... He wants to project a conservative persona while also garnering the support of the Establishment RINOs ....he is treading on turf that will fast disqualify him as a conservative...which I'm not convinced he is.

146 posted on 08/10/2015 10:29:57 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: caww

It has also come out that the Kochs are funding him again. They are big on open borders and gay marriage.


147 posted on 08/10/2015 10:37:38 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

Comment #148 Removed by Moderator

To: sf4dubya

Time to wrap this exchange up. Bye...on to promote my candidate!


149 posted on 08/10/2015 10:46:56 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

I’m not aware of that but I haven’t looked into Kochs much to speak of either. Thanks though.


150 posted on 08/10/2015 10:48:23 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

Comment #151 Removed by Moderator

To: newfreep

Well some good points but I was talking obamas senate record. But we will have to see how this plays out. Most likely neither one gets the nominee. We really have dumb voters in America. If only FREEPERS voted then one of the two would for sure win. Yes I am a bit peeved at voters this moment.


152 posted on 08/10/2015 12:53:03 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: sf4dubya; Cincinatus' Wife
"(pinging some Walker supporters as well)

I know this is a hard thing to grasp. Stick with me for a minute, read this through and tell me if this is unreasonable.
"

I arrived late. How long did the rhetorical ceasefire last? We should be seeing good arguments for good government with an emphasis on candidates' records of governing well.

Consider the histories of nations with a large government-connected faction that markedly indulged in issuing barrages of red herrings, personal insults and generally a cult of personality. Such a faction, believing that strength resides in evil, will not play nice.


153 posted on 08/10/2015 12:53:06 PM PDT by familyop ("Survey Monkey:...pistol whipped unconscious...laying face down on the group.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: sf4dubya

I hear you talking sense but there are posters who mistakenly believe that by tearing down all the walls, that their candidate will have a glorious house to move into.


154 posted on 08/10/2015 1:02:02 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: familyop
... Consider the histories of nations with a large government-connected faction that markedly indulged in issuing barrages of red herrings, personal insults and generally a cult of personality. Such a faction, believing that strength resides in evil, will not play nice.

You are correct.

155 posted on 08/10/2015 1:03:37 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
Fact is Walker came out strongly in support of TPA enanbling Obamatrade on the eve of the critical vote.

Yawn. Walker supported TPA as it was for past presidents and held Congress accountable for any differences and for stopping any bad deals that Obama might make. Remember, Walker could not read the text, so he was giving to support to free trade in general and TPA authority as it was in the past.

That is a far cry from what Ted Cruz did by pulling a John Kerry and voting against TPA before voting for it.

One person squarely in the pocket of the GOP-e is Sen Ted Cruz.

156 posted on 08/10/2015 2:28:16 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Walker -- more conservative actions as governor than even Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
Cruz won’t go along with their open borders, gay marriage agenda. He’ll do just fine without their money. Just another reason not to trust Walker. He is owned and will do what his big donors say.

So, according to your intellect, when Ted Cruz takes money from big donors, it is OK. But when Scott Walker takes money from big donors, he is in their pocket.

Are you legally entitled to this level of hypocrisy or are you too stupid to see it?

157 posted on 08/10/2015 2:30:05 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Walker -- more conservative actions as governor than even Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
It has also come out that the Kochs are funding him again. They are big on open borders and gay marriage.

Yes, that is why Walker, who took money from the Koch family when running for governor and fighting the recall ended in-state tuition for illegals, enacted voter ID, fought against sanctuary cities and enacted ID and drug testing for welfare recipients.

Walker is still giving speeches against gay marriage where he laments the court making such a decision.

So, all you hope to do is INFER that Walker will come out for open borders and gay marriage, while he has never done either of those things.

That makes you a disingenuous human being....more like a liberal.

158 posted on 08/10/2015 2:39:36 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Walker -- more conservative actions as governor than even Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Fought against sanctuary cities? You mean the ones still their, Madison , Racine,and Milwaukee along with the sanctuary county he lives in, Dane County?

Walker is still the one who endorsed his underage son standing up as best man at a gay wedding. He and his family vacation and host parties with a gay couple. Wonder why their kids are confused, not to mention his wife.

He also hinted he wanted the Gang of 8 Rubio who is still for amnesty as a running mate.


159 posted on 08/10/2015 2:49:06 PM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

You or anybody else could read the text of TPA. A link was posted on Free Republic. The TPA bill was published in April, long before the vote.

Cruz was for the next President having TPA, but the reason he pulled his support was because of the back room deals McConnell was making.

Cruz has never come out in support of TPP (Obamatrade) and Walker has.


160 posted on 08/10/2015 2:52:45 PM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson