Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama can do Iran nuclear deal even if Congress disapproves
AP ^ | Aug. 16, 2015 | DEB RIECHMANN

Posted on 08/16/2015 9:34:15 AM PDT by PROCON

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The September vote on the Iran nuclear deal is billed as a titanic standoff between President Barack Obama and Congress. Yet even if lawmakers reject the agreement, it's not game-over for the White House.

A congressional vote of disapproval would not prevent Obama from acting on his own to start putting the accord in place. While he probably would take some heavy criticism, this course would let him add the foreign policy breakthrough to his second-term list of accomplishments.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 0bama; congress; debriechmann; dhimmitude; finalirandeal; iran; iransanctions; israel; jihad; lebanon; mediabias; obamairan; rop; tyranny; waronterror; worldwar3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
While he probably would take some heavy criticism...

From who?

You, AP?

Will ABCNBCCBSCNNMSLSDNYTLATETCETC criticize him?

Bullcrap, you and your ilk love his radical, godless anti-American agenda.

1 posted on 08/16/2015 9:34:15 AM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Second term list of accomplishments?

Breaking the law and trashing the constitution is a liberal’s dream.


2 posted on 08/16/2015 9:36:47 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

And, assuming he has a pair, the next president can start disassembling this “agreement” the day he takes office.


3 posted on 08/16/2015 9:37:56 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
his second-term list of accomplishments.


4 posted on 08/16/2015 9:38:24 AM PDT by relictele (WhatPrincipiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court decision that held that even if an international treaty may constitute an international commitment, it is not binding domestic law unless Congress has enacted statutes implementing it or unless the treaty itself is "self-executing." Also, the Court held that decisions of the International Court of Justice are not binding domestic law and that, without authority from the United States Congress or the Constitution, the President of the United States lacks the power to enforce international treaties or decisions of the International Court of Justice.

Michigan passed the Iran economic sanctions act in 2013 imposing sanctions on Iran based on this precedent. Thank former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz for that one.
5 posted on 08/16/2015 9:38:31 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

You can be sure this propaganda was fed to AP from the White Hut.


6 posted on 08/16/2015 9:38:56 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
“O can stick Iran’s first NUC device up his posterior.
7 posted on 08/16/2015 9:39:06 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Its never game-over for the White House. It does what it wants and congress allows it. The media applauds it.


8 posted on 08/16/2015 9:41:46 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

That’s what I’ve always wanted to know about this.

This “agreement” or “arrangement” is not an official treaty.

They did some half baked congressional vote at the behest of Obama, so that this is not an official treaty, which would require a 2/3 vote in the Senate to be legally binding.

But since whatever comes about will not be legally binding, the next Republican president can simply rescind this on Jan. 20, 2017, right????


9 posted on 08/16/2015 9:42:14 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That’s why we need to get the communist out of the white house and elect a real conservative, constitution loving American.


10 posted on 08/16/2015 9:44:40 AM PDT by PROCON (FReeping on CRUZ Control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Sultan Hussein does not need Congressional approval for any damned thing at all. Congress has rendered itself an Advisory Council, no more. The Court is his Enforcement Arm.


11 posted on 08/16/2015 9:44:49 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

No one has standing to resist Obama.


12 posted on 08/16/2015 9:48:31 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
The GOP aren't reigning in the Pres because they want the power if they ever take the office.

The only Constitutional power a Pres can do concerning foreign affairs is enter into a Treaty, all this agreement $hit as outside the bounds of the Constitution.

13 posted on 08/16/2015 9:48:36 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

I does not matter how official it is or is not. A few understand now, this President IS ruling by Decree. There is no Republic except in the structure that is still on paper. For the time being the USA is an Elective Dictatorship. For the time being.


14 posted on 08/16/2015 9:48:55 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Not as easy as you think. Countries are lining up for trade agreements.....many are done deals already.

And once Obama releases the billions held because they ARE ....cough cough....WERE.. a terrorist state, they're not going to give it back.

15 posted on 08/16/2015 9:49:18 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Given that a ‘Pubbie Congress gave Obama what he wanted, I doubt that any Establishment ‘Pubbie will reverse this. That is why I specified “with a pair.” After all, the vast majority of DC ‘Pubbies long ago had their spines and gonads removed.


16 posted on 08/16/2015 9:49:48 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Then impeach him and remove him from office, otherwise you are complicit in his tyranny house and senate.


17 posted on 08/16/2015 9:49:55 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Boehner has taken this off the table. I think Trump should address the issue of impeachment and/or prosecution of Zippy after he leaves office. They were going to send Nixon to jail.


18 posted on 08/16/2015 9:54:03 AM PDT by quantumman (werea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

[The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur...

Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution


19 posted on 08/16/2015 9:54:39 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
So Iran negotiated 1/3 of a deal. They know how our government works better than Obama and Kerry combined. We have three co-equal branches of government. I know that concept befuddles Mooselimbs, but the Iranian ones know it.

A forced deal isn't worth squat. It's like going to buy a car at a Chrysler dealer with a check requiring three signatures and the other two didn't come with you. The check is no good.

20 posted on 08/16/2015 9:56:00 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson