Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could a President Trump Really Impound All Immigrant Payments to Mexico?
National Review ^ | 08/20/2015 | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 08/20/2015 7:16:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

1 posted on 08/20/2015 7:16:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Executive order #2?


2 posted on 08/20/2015 7:18:00 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But of course.


3 posted on 08/20/2015 7:18:31 AM PDT by HomerBohn (When did it change from "We the people" to "screw the people" ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes. Hire Obonzo’s “lawyers” and claim “Executive Action”. If Obonzo’s “lawyers” say it’s okay, it’s okay.


4 posted on 08/20/2015 7:18:53 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Cecil the Lion says, Stop the Slaughter of the Baby Humans!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Would not surprise me.


5 posted on 08/20/2015 7:18:56 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course he could.

Stupid question.


6 posted on 08/20/2015 7:20:43 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Could a President Trump Really Impound All Immigrant Payments to Mexico?

Let's find out.
7 posted on 08/20/2015 7:20:59 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
A simple tax on wire transfers might offer the path of least resistance.

Well Jim, that's what most people on this board have been saying for over a week now. A 10% tax on wire transfers to Mexico for a limited term, let's say five years, would more than pay for the construction of the wall.

It's just that simple.

8 posted on 08/20/2015 7:21:09 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He will have a pen and paper.


9 posted on 08/20/2015 7:22:41 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The very act of attempting to seize money transfers from illegals will have the effect of reducing illegal immigration.

A more effective method, that would be easier to get through the courts, would be to fine employers who have paid illegals - at a rate that would make it hard to justify hiring illegals in the first place.


10 posted on 08/20/2015 7:23:01 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
But mitigating this perceived injustice might not require grandiose promises to “impound” the money. A simple tax on wire transfers might offer the path of least resistance.

Just the threat - the hint of seizing these funds is really all that is necessary. Trump is the only one with the cajones who's willing to even broach this subject.

11 posted on 08/20/2015 7:23:35 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Well Jim, that's what most people on this board have been saying for over a week now. A 10% tax on wire transfers to Mexico for a limited term, let's say five years, would more than pay for the construction of the wall.

Or would push Mexicans to use other means (Bitcoin, black market means, etc.) to transfer funds back to Mexico. A 10% tax would alter behavior, no doubt.

12 posted on 08/20/2015 7:24:43 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Trump’s pledge to “impound” remittance payments implies seizure, an act that would face a high legal bar to clear.

Yeah, a legal bar about as high as the law which requires everyone entering or leaving the United States with more than $10,000 in cash or its equivalent to file a declaration.

These seizures happen all the time, especially to Asians used to dealing in cash who come here for school or a luxury vacation. Once it is taken, the onus is on them to use our legal system to get it back. Most of them give up.

Ditto for contractors or others dealing in large cash transactions who get caught for petty ante traffic stops and are forced to prove that they came by that much cash legitimately.

13 posted on 08/20/2015 7:24:44 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
But Colorado-based Western Union contended a state attorney general didn’t have the authority to review wire transfers from other U.S. states directly to Mexico, arguing that it violated the privacy of their customers and overstepped limits on the state’s search-and-seizure authority.

 

And there we have it. This is asset forfeiture. Pure and Simple. Funny how the libertarians who moan and groan at this practice are apparently fine when Trump proposes it.

14 posted on 08/20/2015 7:26:33 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama has shown us that a President can pretty much do anything he wants.

That genie will be very difficult to re-bottle.


15 posted on 08/20/2015 7:27:28 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Biology is biology. Everything else is imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

PROBLEM SOLVED Wire-transfer fraud is rampant-—b/c illegals send money across the border that was accumulated by falsifying documents to get tax dollars under multiple identities (could also involve forgery).

Wal Mart, Western Union, Money Gram and other entities wire-transferring $22 billion annually out of the US across the border need to be nailed.


16 posted on 08/20/2015 7:28:09 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

RE: The very act of attempting to seize money transfers from illegals will have the effect of reducing illegal immigration.

How does this seizure of money DIFFERENTIATE between Mexicans who are here LEGALLY, Mexicans who have become American citizens and Mexicans who are illegal?

Or are we going to seize money from all of them without differentiating?


17 posted on 08/20/2015 7:29:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

This argument makes no sense whatsoever. You know why Mexican nationals use Western Union? Because it is simple, easy, and most of all safe.

Do you think that these people would rather risk all of the money on a black market solution instead of knowing it will cost them an additional 10% through Western Union?

Even if they understood Bitcoin and how to transfer it, do you think that their family in Mexico would understand it and trust it?

No. It’s a ridiculous idea that Western Union would suddenly lose all of it’s business from Mexicans who trust it and know it.

It’s like the same claim that if gas goes much higher then Americans will drive less. There might be a slight modification of behavior, but it won’t be significant.


18 posted on 08/20/2015 7:29:18 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not sure whether or not this is germane to the topic, but I just read an interesting comment on another site regarding financial workings between Mexico and the US

“Fun fact about NAFTA: before the ink was even dry the mexicans devalued their currency, triggering a crisis that we had to bail them out of. This wholesale destruction of wages and earnings south of the border was then blamed on NAFTA and is commonly cited as a reason both for mass immigration north, and why we have to accept mass immigration.’’

(posted anonymously, so it’s up in the air whether this is an ‘’improper’’ quotation)

Is this true? The commenter cited no link & I haven’t heard it before.

A reminder- Trump: [Mexico’s] leaders are so much smarter & more cunning than our own.


19 posted on 08/20/2015 7:29:47 AM PDT by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

RE: Obama has shown us that a President can pretty much do anything he wants.

That genie will be very difficult to re-bottle.

____________________________

And you don’t mind if a President Trump continues this lawlessness?


20 posted on 08/20/2015 7:29:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson