Skip to comments.When India sought covert United States help to tackle the ‘triple squeeze’ of 1965
Posted on 08/25/2015 2:37:02 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
At the peak of the 1965 war with Pakistan, India had asked the United States to covertly provide experts to work with Indian military officials to tackle the Chinese threat. This request was made to the US Embassy in Delhi by L K Jha, principal secretary to prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri, on September 18, 1965, after India detected Chinese movements in battalion strength on the eastern border of Ladakh and in Chumbi Valley.
Worried by indications that China was getting ready for military action against India to relieve the pressure on Pakistan, Jha stressed to the embassy that providing military planners need not imply favourable US response to Indias request for help if Chinese attack. However, if an attack should come it could speed up effective assistance by several days. His request on strictly covert basis to authorise US personnel to consult with Indian military planners on contingency basis is mentioned in a telegram sent by the US embassy to the State Department. That telegram, since declassified, is in the US National Archives and Records Administration, RG 59, Central Files 1964-66.
The embassy recommended a favourable response to Jhas request, but the State Department instructed the embassy with a return telegram that the decision taken at the highest level was to avoid commitment of any sort pending the unfolding of the situation. The embassy was asked to tell the Indian government that the US commitment in Vietnam was heavy and increasing.
The US too had been worried about the possibility of China opening a front against India in support of Pakistan. On September 8, China had sent India a note protesting violations of Chinese territory by Indian troops and warning that if these did not cease, India must bear responsibility for all consequences arising therefrom. That very day, US President Lyndon Johnson and secretary of defense Robert McNamara discussed on phone what they saw as dangerous possibilities. According to the Recording of Telephone Conversation of September 8, 1965, 6 pm (Tape F65.02, Side A, PNO 1 held with Johnson Library), Johnson told McNamara about the Chinese note to India: And looked like she [China] was threatening to today, didnt she? McNamara responded: Shell threaten and we ought to know what wed do if she did move. Wed be in a terrible jam if she did and we didnt have plans. So well be working on that.
Indian ambassador to the US B K Nehru had also raised Delhis concerns about China and Indonesia when he met Johnson for an off-the-record meeting on September 9.
Nehru handed over PM Shastris letter to Johnson and said that Delhi felt there was a clear Chinese-Pakistani-Indonesian understanding to put a triple squeeze on us. President Johnson said the thought that the Chinese could attack India was giving us gray hairs right now. Nehru said India thought the Indonesian contribution might be to take the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. India couldnt stop this; it had no navy.
On September 17, Nehru handed another letter from Shastri to Johnson and requested the secretary of state, Dean Rusk, for a formal statement warning China that US will intervene if Chicoms [Chinese Communists] attack India. Nehru also requested Rusk that the US come to Indias assistance if Chicoms attack, though the nature of such assistance would be for the US to decide. Rusk said only the President could take such a decision and any formal warning would have no credible deterrent effect if not backed by decision to act. He told Nehru that the US had used the Cabot-Wang talks, held on September 15 in Warsaw, to warn China about interfering in Indo-Pak fighting.
The war between India and Pakistan ended with a ceasefire on September 22, 1965. The requests made to the US in 1965 differ from those made during the 1962 Indo-China war in one significant way. In 1965, these requests were made to the US verbally, by both Jha and B K Nehru. However in 1962, prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru had written to President John F Kennedy seeking comprehensive assistance, which included 12 squadrons of supersonic all-weather fighters and a modern radar system, from the US against China.
The decision to make only verbal requests for US help can be traced to what happened in Parliament in March 1965. Shastri had then threatened Sudhir Ghosh, a Rajya Sabha MP from West Bengal, with expulsion for accusing PM Nehru of something no one saw possible.
Rudra Chaudhauri, senior lecturer at Kings College, London, told The Indian Express that Sudhir Ghosh chanced upon these revelations some time after Nehru died. Kennedy in fact mentioned the request made by the erstwhile prime minister. In turn, Ghosh repeated Kennedys summary of Nehrus request for direct US military assistance. Shastri was speechless.
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/when-india-sought-covert-us-help-to-tackle-the-triple-squeeze-of-1965/#sthash.uiYv0IFv.dpuf
At the time, wasn’t India a Soviet client?
Not, really. It was still “undecided” with most of its weaponry coming from the U.K. and France. It was only after Indira Gandhi came to power (1966) that a tilt to Moscow happened.
It pains me that India and the United States did not form an early and strong partnership after Indian Independence.
Yes India had many problems, but more potential and desire to fix them than countries such as Pakistan.
Why we armed Pakistan to India’s detriment still escapes me.
For India’s part, why they sucked up to the USSR and were so often hostile is also a mystery.
Putting the past behind, I’d be comfortable with India being the primary power in the Indian Ocean, and being aligned with the U.S.
India was not “undecided”, it was formally part of the so called “non-aligned nations” forming a bloc in the United Nations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.