Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Planned Parenthood Founder Said She'd Leave Country If JFK Elected--Because He Was Catholic
CNS News ^ | 9/8/15 | Michael W. Chapman

Posted on 09/09/2015 11:23:22 AM PDT by wagglebee

(CNSNews.com) – Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger opposed the Catholic Church for decades because of its moral teachings and its theology in general, to the point that in 1960, when John F. Kennedy, a Catholic, ran for president, Sanger said if he were elected, she would “find another place to live.”

Sanger (1879-1966), in her many writings and speeches, frequently attacked the Catholic Church, describing it as among the “arch-enemies to hinder the progress of enlightenment” and determined to destroy America’s “liberties” and establish its own “rules & dominion.”  

In early July 1960, when then-Senator John F. Kennedy (D-Mass.) was about to be nominated by the Democratic Party as their candidate to run against Republican Richard M. Nixon, a Quaker, in the November election, Sanger was asked about the contest.

The Associated Press story, from Honolulu, Hawaii and printed on the front page of the Milwaukee Journal on July 6, 1960 was headlined, “If Kennedy Wins, Mrs. Sanger is Going to Quit US.”

The story states:

Mrs. Margaret Sanger, crusader for birth control, says she will "find another place to live" if Senator John F. Kennedy becomes president.

Mrs. Sanger said she was opposed to Kennedy because of his religion.

"In my estimation a Roman Catholic is neither Democrat nor Republican."

"Nor American, nor Chinese; he is a Roman Catholic," Mrs. Sanger said.

Mrs. Sanger is here [Hawaii] on a vacation from her Tucson (Ariz.) home.

She told a reporter that a Roman Catholic at the head of the country would "make impossible America's most important contribution to world peace -- the dissemination of birth control information."

She is the founder and president emeritus of the Planned Parenthood federation.

After Kennedy was elected on Nov. 10, Sanger’s anti-Catholic remarks were picked up again by the news media. But as The New York Times reported that day, Sanger had decided to wait a year before deciding whether to leave the United States. 

The New York Times article was headlined, “Mrs. Sanger Staying,” as documented in the Margaret Sanger Papers Project at New York University. 

Sanger’s anti-Catholicism was clear: Catholics, including JFK, could not be Democrat or Republican or even American. 

There are many examples of the Planned Parenthood founder’s anti-Catholicism.

In 1921, Sanger said it was okay for Catholics to keep their ideas in their church but when they try “to make these ideas legislative acts and force their opinions and code of morals upon the Protestant members of this country, then we do consider this an interference with the principles of this Democracy and we have a right to protest.”

In the July 1916 edition of Birth Control, Sanger said, “Take the clergy, (Catholics especially).  They are the beneficiaries of the church that has made breeding its main source of revenue. They preach from a ‘sacred book’ to ‘multiply and replenish the earth,’ knowing that large families among working people tend to preserve their influence and authority.”

Sanger complained in January 1932 that “Catholic doctrine is illogical, not in accord with science and definitely against social welfare and race improvement.” 

In a draft article, Women and the Catholic Church,  Sanger said the Roman Catholic “Church issues commands to its adherents who, tho citizens of this country obey these commands against our constitutional rights. It is annihilating our liberties and establishing its rules & dominion in its place.”

Sanger, a long-time advocate for artificial birth control who supported eugenics -- selective breeding and sterilization to diminish the so-called inferior races and promote the growth of so-called superior races -- was the founder of the American Birth Control League (ABCL).

The ABCL eventually was merged with another group, the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau, in 1939, and was renamed the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) in 1942.  In 1952, Sanger helped found the International Planned Parenthood Federation and served as its first president until 1959.

Planned Parenthood is America’s largest abortion provider.  According to its latest annual report, Planned Parenthood performed 327,653 abortions in 2013-14 and the organization received $528.4 million in taxpayer funding through “government health service grants and reimbursements.”  


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: abortion; deathpanels; epa; eugenics; globalwarminghoax; hawaii; honolulu; jfk; johnfkennedy; margaretsanger; massachusetts; milwaukee; moralabsolutes; obamacare; plannedparenthood; popefrancis; pp; prolife; romancatholicism; stemexpress; wisconsin; zerocare
Sanger complained in January 1932 that “Catholic doctrine is illogical, not in accord with science and definitely against social welfare and race improvement.”

Big Murder exists to exterminate those they deem inferior.

1 posted on 09/09/2015 11:23:22 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; narses; Salvation; NYer
Pro-Life/Catholic Ping
2 posted on 09/09/2015 11:23:58 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 09/09/2015 11:24:26 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Crazy old broad. Reminds me of my sister in law. (lives in Boston)


4 posted on 09/09/2015 11:25:25 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Well, given JFK rather active lifestyle, I wouldn’t be surprised if his activities were a big business for Planned Parenthood.


5 posted on 09/09/2015 11:25:52 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

She’s in a ‘better place’ now more suited for her. (’


6 posted on 09/09/2015 11:26:09 AM PDT by tflabo (Psalm 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Said She'd Leave Country If JFK Elected

Must be why the mob stole the Illinois vote.

7 posted on 09/09/2015 11:26:33 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Thanks for posting these 1912 assertions by Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood. Her remarks simply restated one aspect of the declarations of the leaders of the liberal movement well under way by 1912.

For documentation, please consult the following record.

Back in 1876, a Black Minister and Ohio State Legislator, Rev. Benjamin W. Arnett, delivered the "Centennial Thanksgiving Sermon," celebrating the Declaration of Independence, at St. Paul A.M.E. Church in Urbana, Ohio. The Sermon, which examined the nature of governments, and the history of nations, can be read online IN ITS ENTIRETY at the American Memory Section of the Library of Congress, in the African-American Collection. Below is a relatively small excerpt from that Sermon's conclusion. In it, Rev. Arnett warned about a movement among "liberals" to remove the ideas underlying America's founding documents. See if you don't recognize those ideas in what you have observed in recent years:

"The Danger to our Country.

"Now that our national glory and grandeur is principally derived from the position the fathers took on the great questions of right and wrong, and the career of this nation has been unparalleled in the history of the past, now there are those who are demanding the tearing down the strength of our national fabric. They may not intend to tear it down, but just as sure as they have their way, just that sure will they undermine our superstructure and cause the greatest calamity of the age. What are the demands of this party of men? Just look at it and examine it for yourselves, and see if you are willing that they shall have their way; or will you still assist in keeping the ship of state in the hands of the same crew and run her by the old gospel chart! But ye men who think there is no danger listen to the demands of the Liberals as they choose to call themselves:

"'Organize! Liberals of America! The hour for action has arrived. The cause of freedom calls upon us to combine our strength, our zeal, our efforts. These are The Demands of Liberalism:

"'1. We demand that churches and other ecclesiastical property shall no longer be exempt from just taxation.

"'2. We demand that the employment of chaplains in Congress, in State Legislatures, in the navy and militia, and in prisons, asylums, and all other institutions supported by public money, shall be discontinued.

"'3. We demand that all public appropriations for sectarian educational and charitable institutions shall cease.

"'4. We demand that all religious services now sustained by the government shall be abolished; and especially that the use of the Bible in the public schools, whether ostensibly as a text-book or avowedly as a book of religious worship, shall be prohibited.

"'5. We demand that the appointment, by the President of the United States or by the Governors of the various States, of all religious festivals and fasts shall wholly cease.

"'6. We demand that the judicial oath in the courts and in all other departments of the government shall be abolished, and that simple affirmation under the pains and penalties of perjury shall be established in its stead.

"'7. We demand that all laws directly or indirectly enforcing the observance of Sunday as the Sabbath shall be repealed.

"'8. We demand that all laws looking to the enforcement of “Christian” morality shall be abrogated, and that all laws shall be conformed to the requirements of natural morality, equal rights, and impartial liberty.

"'9. We demand that not only in the Constitution of the United States and of the several States, but also in the practical administration of the same, no privilege or advantage shall be conceded to Christianity or any other special religion; that our entire political system shall be founded and administered on a purely secular basis; and that whatever changes shall prove necessary to this end shall be consistently, unflinchingly, and promptly made.'

"'Let us boldly and with high purpose meet the duty of the hour.'

"Now we must not think that we have nothing to do in this great work, for the men who are at the head of this movement are men of culture and intelligence, and many of them are men of influence. They are led by that thinker and scholar, F. E. Abbott, than whom I know but few men who has a smoother pen, or who is his equal on the battle-field of thought. He says in an address on the duty of his leagues:

"'My answer may be a negative one to all who see nothing positive in the idea of liberty. The conviction I refer to is this: that, regarded as a theological system, Christianity is Superstition, and, regarded as an organized institution, Christianity is Slavery. The purpose I refer to is this: that, whether regarded as theological system, Christianity shall wholly cease to exercise influence in political matters. Although the national Constitution is strictly secular and non-Christian, there are many things in the practical administration of the government which violate its spirit, and constitute a virtual recognition of Christianity as the national religion. These violations are very dangerous; they are on the increase; they more and more give Christianity a practical hold upon the government; they directly tend to strengthen the influence of Christianity over the people, and to fortify it both as a theology and a church; and they are therefore justly viewed with growing indignation by liberals. Not unreasonably are they looked upon as paving the way to a formidable effort to carry the Christian Amendment to the Constitution; and the liberals are beginning to see that they must extinguish the conflagration in its commencement. I believe all this myself, with more intense conviction every day; and therefore I appeal frankly to the people to begin now to lay the foundations of a great National Party of Freedom. It is not a moment too soon. If the liberals are wise, they will see the facts as they are, and act accordingly. Not with hostility, bitterness, defiance, or anger but rather with love to all men and high faith in the beneficence of consistently republican institutions, do I urge them most earnestly to begin the work at once.'

"He acknowledges that this is a religious nation and wants all men to assist him in eliminating the grand old granite principles from the framework of our national union. Will you do it freeman; will we sell the temple reared at the cost of so much precious blood and treasure? These men would have us turn back the hands on the clock of our national progress, and stay the shadow on the dial plate of our christian civilization; they would have us call a retreat to the soldiers in the army of Christ; the banner of the cross they would have us haul down, and reverse the engines of war against sin and crime; the songs of Zion they would turn into discord, and for the harmony and the melody of the sons of God, they would give us general confusion; they would have us chain the forces of virtue and unloose the elements of vice; they would have the nation loose its moorings from the Lord of truth and experience and commit interest, morally, socially; religiously and politically to the unsafe and unreliable human reason; they would discharge God and his crew and run the ship of State by the light of reason, which has always been but a dim taper in the world, and all the foot-prints it has left are marked with the blood of men, women and children. No nation is safe when left alone with reason.

"But we have no notion of giving up the contest without a struggle or a battle. We are aware that there is a great commotion in the world of thought. Religion and science are at arms length contending with all their forces for the mastery. Faith and unbelief are fighting their old battles over again, everything that can be shaken is shaking. The foundations of belief are assaulted by the army of science and men are changing their opinions. New and starting theories are promulgated to the world; old truths are putting on new garbs. Error is dressing in the latest style, wrong is secured by the unholy alliances, changes in men and things, revolution in church and state, Empires are crumbling, Kingdoms tottering; everywhere the change is seen. In the social circle, in the school house, in the pulpit and in the pews. But amid all the changes and revolutions there are some things that are unchangeable, unmovable and enduring. The forces that underline the vital power of Christianity are the same yesterday, to-day, to-morrow and forever more. They are like their God, who is omnipotent, immovable and eternal, and everywhere truth has marched it has left its moccasin tracks.

"The Conclusion of the Whole Matter.We have patiently tried to examine the record of the nations of antiquity and learn the cause of their decay and decline, their fall, why their early death; and why so many implements of destruction around and about their tombs, and everywhere, in the silent streets, mouldering ruins, tottering columns, mouldy and moist rooms, and the united voice from the sepulcher of the dead past is, "sin is a reproach to any people." We see it written on the tombs of the Kings, and engraven on the pages of time, "sin is a reproach to any people." These are the principles of governments, Right and wrong; and the people who are the advocates of Right have bound themselves together and by their united effort they have brought light out of darkness and forced strength out of weakness.

"We as a nation have a grand and glorious future before us. The sun of our nation is just arising above the horizon and is now sending his golden rays of peace from one end of the land to the other. The utmost extremities of the members of the body politic are warm and in motion by the commercial and financial activities of the land. Her face is destined to blush with beauty when peace and justice shall be enthroned. The grand march of progress shall mark her in her onward advancement in moral strength, intellectual brilliancy, and political power. Then we can say that we give to every man, woman and child the benefit of our free institutions, giving all the benefits of our common school and the freedom to worship God under their own vine and fig tree. Then will we see written, on the banner of our free, redeemed and disenthralled country, the sublime words written, not in the blood of men, but in the sun-light of truth, that "Righteousness exalteth a nation." It will fall like the morning dew on the lowly; it will descend like the showers of May on the poor; and like the sun it will shine on the good and bad, dispensing from the hand of plenty the blessings of a government founded on the principle of justice and equality.

"Standing on the threshold of the second century of the nation's life, with the experience of the past lying at our feet, we are saluted by the shout of triumph from the millions who left their homes and business and attended the Great Exposition of the skill and genius of the world, collected at Philadelphia. We were permitted to receive the greetings from the oldest to the youngest nation of the earth. Egypt and the United States clasped hands over the waste of 5,000 years, and lay their treasures at the feet of our civilization. The material, intellectual and mechanical deterioration of the one, and the unprecedented progress of the other, stand in great contrast; in all that makes the nation great,—morally, religiously and socially, the young nation is ahead.

"Following the tracks of righteousness throughout the centuries and along the way of nations, we are prepared to recommend it to all and assert without a shadow of doubt, that "Righteousness exalted a nation"; but on the other hand following the foot-prints of sin amid the ruins of Empires and remains of cities, we will say that "sin is a reproach to any people." But we call on all American citizens to love their country, and look not on the sins of the past, but arming ourselves for the conflict of the future, girding ourselves in the habiliments of Righteousness, march forth with the courage of a Numidian lion and with the confidence of a Roman Gladiator, and meet the demands of the age, and satisfy the duties of the hour. Let us be encouraged in our work, for we have found the moccasin track of Righteousness all along the shore of the stream of life, constantly advancing, holding humanity with a firm hand. We have seen it “through” all the confusion of rising and falling States, of battle, siege and slaughter, of victory and defeat; through the varying fortunes and ultimate extinctions of Monarchies, Republics and Empires; through barbaric irruption and desolation, feudal isolation, spiritual supremacy, the heroic rush and conflict of the Cross and Crescent; amid the busy hum of industry, through the marts of trade and behind the gliding keels of commerce.”

"And in America, the battle-field of modern thought, we can trace the foot-prints of the one and the tracks of the other. So let us use all of our available forces, and especially our young men, and throw them into the conflict of the Right against the Wrong.

"Then let the grand Centennial Thanksgiving song be heard and sung in every house of God; and in every home may thanksgiving sounds be heard, for our race has been emancipated, enfranchised and are now educating, and have the gospel preached to them!

"Sons of freedom, sing the glad hymns of praise on the Western plains! Daughters of sorrow shout the joyful tidings amid the savannahs of the South-land! Proclaim it on the Atlantic's western stand and declare it on the slopes of the Pacific! Humble followers of the Son of Mary, chant the eternal truth in the temple of the Most High, that “Righteousness exalteth a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.”

"We invite every nation, kindred, tongue and people, to come to our land. Come from the bogs of Ireland; come from the dykes of Holland; come from the mountains of Switzerland; and from the sunny plains of Italy; and enjoy a government made for man! Come from the jungles of Africa or Egypt, the university of the infant world; come from Asia the cradle of humanity; come and bring your gifts from the Islands of the South Sea and spice land! Come ye men of every clime and race and see a nation founded in Righteousness, guarded by Justice, and supported by truth and equity, and defended by God!

"When thus united in one grand commonwealth of nationalities the universal prayer will be:

"Show us our Aaron, with his rod of flower!
Our Miriam, with her timbrel soul in tune!
And call some Joshua, in spirits power,
To praise our sun of strength at point of noon.
God of our fathers! over sand and sea,
Still keep our struggling footsteps close to thee." - (End of Excerpt from "Righteousness Exalteth a Nation, but Sin is a Reproach to Any People")

So said Rev. Benjamin Arnett in 1876. Where is the leader who will declare these things today? Arnett, the learned statesman and minister, chose as his theme, "Righteousness Exalteth a Nation, but Sin is a Reproach to Any People."

Might such outspoken thoughts enlighten the minds of Americans today as they discuss the topic of this thread?

8 posted on 09/09/2015 11:30:59 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Good catch.


9 posted on 09/09/2015 11:37:09 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Another empty promise from a Lib.


10 posted on 09/09/2015 11:39:44 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Biology is biology. Everything else is imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

What a shame someone didn’t think to abort her before she polluted the human with her presence. Might have spared a lot of suffering.


11 posted on 09/09/2015 11:50:23 AM PDT by Jean2 (ox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

DID SHE?


12 posted on 09/09/2015 12:07:40 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jean2
"What a shame someone didn’t think to abort her"

But if somebody had done that, they would have become Margaret Sanger.

13 posted on 09/09/2015 12:09:20 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("He comes to judge the living and the dead, and the world by fire.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Too bad the Catholic politicians... weren’t.


14 posted on 09/09/2015 12:10:22 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("He comes to judge the living and the dead, and the world by fire.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Sad but true.


15 posted on 09/09/2015 12:55:42 PM PDT by Jean2 (ox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Didn’t leave, did she? More’s the pity!

I remember when some were saying the Statue of Liberty was going to be renamed “Our Lady of the Harbor” if Kennedy was elected, and instead of In God We Trust on our money it would be “In Pope We Hope”.


16 posted on 09/09/2015 1:21:29 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Many people in America of the 1950s were opposed to Roman Catholicism, which in the days before Vatican II presented a very different face to the world than it does today.

Evangelical Protestants have theological reasons to object to Roman Catholicism which date back to the Reformation. Those reasons are clear, they're written down in the confessions of their churches, and they are not unlike what was decreed against them on the other side by the Council of Trent.

What's not widely understood today is that for much of the 1800s and for the first half of the 1900s, liberal Protestants and secularists made common cause with evangelical Protestants to fight Roman Catholic influence in America. Margaret Sanger's comments, which today would be considered extreme bigotry not associated with liberalism, are part of that older consensus.

It seems clear that what Sanger failed to understand during the 1960 presidential election was that Roman Catholicism was not of a single mind. Cradle Catholics like those in the Kennedy family may have claimed the name of Catholic but were not living in any serious way as faithful Catholics.

The election of a Roman Catholic president could have marked the beginning of an entirely new Roman Catholic dominance of American political life, as the ward bosses of places like Chicago, Boston and New York City, most of whom were Roman Catholic Democrats, worked together with the rising power of Hispanics in places like California and Florida to put Roman Catholicism into a dominant position in America.

Why didn't that happen?

In large measure, that didn't happen because lots of Roman Catholics cared no more about what their church believed than liberal Protestants did. The liberal Protestants didn't leave their churches; they simply worked from within to change church doctrine. Liberal Catholics may have been unable to formally change church doctrine, but they did an awfully good job of hollowing out the church's ability to effectively enforce it.

By the 1980s, it became patently obvious that conservative Catholics and conservative Protestants had a lot more in common than either did with liberals in their churches, and the common front against abortion was a big part of that.

17 posted on 09/30/2015 2:26:02 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson