Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China’s Master Plan to Destroy the F-22 and F-35 in Battle
The National Interest ^ | September 17, 2015 | Dave Majumdar

Posted on 09/17/2015 10:02:19 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Mariner

With the US Military being used more and more to protect the special interests of the New World Order and their agenda, Congress will probably stay up to the task.


41 posted on 09/18/2015 1:11:17 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90; Mariner
The Russians and Chinese have plans to beat us in the air.

Actually, they may have plans but that doesn't mean those plans are credible.

1. Beat us by numbers. Far more SU-35’s and J-11s than F-15/16/18 variants.

That is not correct. The SU-35 only got to a point where it is now able to be used operationally (the SU-35S), and there are definitely FAR more F-15s and F-16s than there are SU-35s and J-11s. Actually, the total number of F-16s alone are more than all Flanker derivatives (from SU-27s to SU-33s to J-11s to SU-30s) in existence.

2. Match us in technology. Russia has the SU-50, and the Chinese J-xx, are both knock offs of the F-35.

Two points here: first of all, the SU-50 (PakFa) and the J-20 do not match the US in technology. The PakFa is an absolutely capable plane, particularly if the Russians are able to pump more money into it, but it is not an F-22. What it is is a plane that can be deadly to any 4th generation fighter out there, and once operational it will be a really capable platform, but it is simply not a Raptor (even the Russians admit that). As for the J-20 ...no one who is not high-level Chinese or alphabet-soup organization (CIA/NSA etc) knows the actual capability of that plane. Some have speculated it is quite capable as a missile truck, while others have said that it is limited as a fighter. Fact is, neither of them match the technology of the United States. Second point: neither is a knock-off of the F-35. Definitely not the PakFa, and the J-20 only uses the intake structure of the F-35. None are knockoffs of the F-35, and the closest plane that could be considered that is the J-31 (the 'other' Chinese stealth fighter), which at some angles looks like a twin-engined 35.

3. Beat us in technology. Russian and Chines 4th generation fighters have advanced AESA radar and plasma stealth.

Absolutely not, and it is quite ridiculous to be honest with you Thunder 90 (although in past posts you do tend to exaggerate Red Force capabilities). For one, Russian radars are powerful (going back to the PESAs - note, PESA not AES - in the MiG-25 decades back), but their AESA technology is not equal to that of the US. American radar technology, particularly cutting-edge LPI AESAs, are simply the world standard. And when you move to China ...the same gulf between the US and Russia is the same delta between Russia and China. Chinese radars are getting better, but just like their engines, they are not even at the level of Russia let alone the Us.

I will not bother discussing plasma stealth. Just because something has SOME theoretical merit doesn't mean that its real-world applications are credible.

42 posted on 09/22/2015 12:49:50 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
"I will not bother discussing plasma stealth. "

I'm surprised you were able to muster the energy for a detailed refutation.

Plasma stealth lol

43 posted on 09/22/2015 8:13:17 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
:)
44 posted on 09/22/2015 12:49:28 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson