The Supremes
Posted on 10/11/2015 12:59:02 AM PDT by Monorprise
Besides doing something about certain lawless decisions made by our black-robed masters, something must also be done about how we came to such a place where they can cast their gaze across the fruited plain and whatever catches their fancy becomes the law of the land, indeed higher than the Constitution.
Roe was bad enough, a joke of a decision made out of whole cloth after Justice Blackmun consulted with phony history and the opinion of his young daughter. But Obergefell is much worse, coming as it does after twenty years of everyday Americans making their views abundantly and overwhelmingly known that they reject faux marriage of the same-sex.
Sitting in their august temple they did what they had wanted to do for some time, and to hell with the democratic process so faithfully adhered to by regular folks. They imposed faux marriage on the whole country with the majority opinion written by Justice Kennedy getting snickers from left, right, and center though not from gay guys who are using some of it in their faux wedding ceremonies.
(Excerpt) Read more at crisismagazine.com ...
We can campaign on it on the guise of everyone is entitled to an appeal in court.
No chance of Congress rousing itself to exercise the power of the purse as long as it’s just the best little bordello on the Potomac for the US Chamber of Commerce.
I like the way that the German Supreme Court works. They can decide that a law is wrong or unethical....but after that....all they can do is hand it back to the Parliament and say that the law must be changed within the next year, and it must reflect the problem they identified being changed. They can’t make law....they can only enforce the law or say it won’t work....that’s it.
I always thought that was the way our SC was SUPPOSED to work
It’s a step in the right direction. I am sharing this article with evryone I can. I especially like the point... The Supreme Court has become a rolling con con... I think this point has legs. Now if we could only get Cruz, the constitutional candidate on board, add this tenet...
Legislative restoration... Is it possible? The GOPe won’t like restoring the constitution...but I like it, very much.
There is no delegation to the Federal government for their regulation of marriage, the power is reserved to the States.
For the USSC to use the equal protection clause to claim jurisdiction they must first adopt a radical and novel definition of “marriage”
Once the radical and novel definition of “marriage” has been adopted by the USSC they may then make a legitimate claim of an equal protection issue, but not until they have adopted the radical and novel definition of “marriage” is there an equal protection issue.
Not until they have adopted the radical and novel definition of “marriage” may they have the fig leaf of jurisdiction thus paving the way for the subsequent illicit imposition of the radical and novel definition of “marriage”
This circular absurdity is nothing compared to the breathtaking arrogance of declaring what the law of each and all of the States shall be.
By declaring that homosexuals may, in each and every State, marry, they have made themselves a Super-Legislature of ALL the States collectively as a whole - a Branch of Government which does not exist under the U.S. Constitution!
Not only have the made themselves legislators, they have erected a fourth Branch of Government. A fourth Branch of Government which substitutes its legislation for that of each and all of the States.
They have legislated. They have intruded upon the independent sovereignty of the States. They have acted entirely outside the Constitution.
To conceal and “justify” their compound criminality they clothe it with an invented “fundamental right” where there is no such right.
The compound criminality of Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan demands their impeachment.
As Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan must be impeached so must Roberts for his serial criminality regarding PPACA re-writing and absurd interpretation of words (”established by the state”).
Roberts, like Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, have attacked language itself. If their attack is not repelled then the meaning of any word is indeterminate, even if it has been well established since time immemorial. The power to alter words means the power of the USSC is unlimited. Anything can be said to be an equal protection violation - or anything else they damn well please.
They imagine themselves Kings. They need to be thrown out on their ass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_y6nFjoVp4
We think Diana Ross’s hairdo is just too high in this one. Even for the stage.
Knock it down.
The grandiose temple should never have been built. The Court should be moved into rented office in the suburbs, with dropped ceilings and fluorescent lights, preferably buzzing. Each Justice could have a nice cubicle.
Since the 14th Amendment was passed to protect the freed slaves from the Democrat party, and all the freed slaves are deceased, the 14th Amendment should be repealed.
This would instantly obliterate the bogus “incorporation doctrine” and a long list of abusive USSC decisions.
And anchor babies.
Scrotus simply invents queer marriage and forces it on normal people. The selective enforcement and invention of laws is simply lawlessness at the highest level. If only we had 3 good generals, one for each branch of government, to step forward and purge the empire of DC of the criminals running the show.
Thrown out and prosecuted for crimes against US citizens.
By now it’s clear that the preferred tactic of the Supreme Court and the lower courts is to claim one party (usually conservative) does not have standing. The case magically vanishes with no hope of appeal.
Conversely, any lefty with a gripe is fast-tracked through the system, whether the aim is to overturn legitimate, perfectly democratic
legislation or referenda, or to provide a poster child for the court to invent law as they did with the ludicrous gay marriage decision.
The fix is in. Perhaps it always was but now they are more brazen about it.
Elected judges is a messy business....at the very least there should be term limits.
Cordially,
“...to help slow down the court’s corruption...”
Bananas here, bananas for sale, come get your bananas!!!
IMHO
Glad to see articles like this. The scrotus is no different from the other two branches of the kleptocracy. Except they never stand for election. They’re just as political and just as corrupt. But they do have a better theatrical routine.
If we want self governance we’re going to have to self govern. And by necessity it will exclude the clowns in the District of Corruption.
An Appellate decision by the USSC CANNOT APPLY to Any State, It can only be applied to the case at hand. only those cases heard in their ‘Original Jurisdiction” at the supreme Court level apply to States.
Read section 2 closely and remember the word “SHALL” means it is MANDATORY, Not an Option.
Just because the supreme Court refuses to abide the Constitution does not mean STATES have to go along with it.
Article 3, section 2:
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
time to knock ‘em ALL down!
only can be done by a return to our original constitution w/o poyus, supremes, congress, and all the alphabet soup agencies that support them!!!!!!
Gunny G
******
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.