Posted on 12/10/2015 3:04:19 AM PST by Biggirl
(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means, is inadmissible.
.........................................................
Muslims are inadmissible under this law because they adhere to Sharia which is contrary to the U.S. Constitution. A Muslim CANNOT disobey Sharia under pain of death, therefore he is in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution to which he must swear allegiance.
yeah, that’s about it.....
You couldn't be more right. If we thought a 2012 win was imperative, and all of us except Romney did; 2016, more than imperative, is the last election to be won unless we plunge off the precipice we now teeter upon, and into the abyss.
Instead, Islam is a THEOCRACY.
"A form of government which defers not to civil development of law, but to an interpretation of the will of a god as set out in religious scripture and authorities."
All law in a theocracy must be as set out within, or entirely consistent with whatever religious text the ruling religion abides by. For example, in an Islamic theocracy such as Iran, that text would be the Koran.
In a theocracy, the courts are usually presided over by religious officials, who are taken as more versant in the applicable legal texts.
Theocracies generally do not tolerate freedom of expression. They believe their dogma is divine; that it comes from divine revelation (directly from God as in Moses on Mount Sinai) and therefore, no dissenting opinion can be accurate or helpful. This often leads to widespread abuse of basic human rights."
If you want to read a perfect example of "Taqiya"
("In Shi'a Islam, taqiya is a form of religious lie, or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts, specially while they are in fear or at risk of significant persecution.")
look here:
Other examples of taqiaya are:
"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor"
"I did not have sex with that woman"
"Of course, I'll respect you in the morning"
"The check is in the mail"
Religious freedom means Islamic terrorists have a constitutional right to come to the USA and murder American citizens in the name of there god Allah? Wow.
The Bill of Rights applies to citizens. It has no authority to confer rights on foreigners, specifically because it does not say that it does, nor does any clause or statement elsewhere in the Constitution that I can recall. Am I forgetting something?
That would mean the US Code would still be in force in that regard. Only in our oddball, instant-media moment of history would anyone entertain the idea that being a citizen of a country is irrelevant to your rights and privileges there. National security has always been considered important, and always will be. When it's not taken seriously, that problem solves itself as the country loses its sovereignty to another power willing to promote its own interests.
I intend to use this as a blunt instrument on Leftist skulls.
Even if it doesn’t change their minds, I still get to beat upon them, which will be most gratifying...
If Obama can de facto prevent Christian immigration from Syria it follows that Trump could prevent Muslim immigration. Case closed.
You see, it would discriminate against American Muslims if they could not bring their relatives in through chain migration, but citizens of other religions could.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any
class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the
interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such
period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or
any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the
entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate
One of the benefits of this massive media meltdown is so many blustering pundits and politicians have exposed themselves as ideological doctrine fools with little to no real intellectual ability.
Bill of Rights, “freedom of religion”
Neither apply to Immigration. Those apply to people living here, they do not apply to those wishing to come here. Quit trying to re-write the Constitution to say things it does not.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any
class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the
interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such
period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or
any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the
entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate
Funny how our constitution applies to everyone on earth when it comes to handing out freebies and opening our border but taxation, obamacare penalties and other constitutionally protected things do not. They are not citizens! They are only subject to the laws of their home country! I can’t believe these libs can keep a straight face and say this stuff.
:: Bill of Rights, “freedom of religionâ€. Trumps 8(1182)(f) ::
But as citizens of another nation/government/compact, 1Amnd protection does not apply to them.
It’s kinda like how some drivers assume that just because they have their turn signal on, they have the right of way to move right in on you, no matter where you are or where they’re coming from. They didn’t get that part of their state’s written exam correct and a lot of them don’t even have a license.
Nothing is stopping American Muslims from going to their relatives country, if that country will take them. Besides, it's not discrimination, it's a temporary ban, for safety.
***************************************************
Rush:
:-)
I’d like to see their basis for disqualification.
They scream “unconstitutional” when it suits them. Otherwise, it’s a living, breathing document.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.