Posted on 12/25/2015 11:53:46 PM PST by Mariner
Yes, as proven by the American public’s embrace of the Clinton impeachment.
LOL. It’s a combo. After all, he was America’s first black president.
To me, Slick’s impeachment is unfinished business.
If the Clintons want to re-open old wounds, then bring it.
They are both multiple felons, and justice has been delayed far too long.
Thank God Trump has taken the narrative away from the GOP-E and Karl Rove—those guys would rather see Hillary in the White House than for Trump to win.
At every Clinton stop Trump should arrange for Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones and Monika Lewinsky to be there to “greet him”.
In addition to hearing more from Bill's women, expect to see/hear more of the interview of Hillary laughing/cackling about defending a child rapist.
I think that this is a battle on unfavorable ground that the Clintonistas will regret starting.
That would be a mistake, imho. Too carnivalesque. Trump can do enough damage just shredding Hill and Bill on the stump and forcing the media to finally cover it. 90% of Americans who know about Bill only know about Monica (who will likely be paid to endorse Hillary at some point, btw). Trump needs to pound Hillary over her role in enabling and covering it up. But Trump can't control the optics of a presser with the ladies, nor what they might say in response to questions. And it may diminish their victim status to appear at one.
They are NOT the same. Bill remains very popular. She does not. Attack her, relentlessly, and it will do major damage, and Bill will likely go off-script and say something stupid and damaging, as he did after a rough debate before SC in 2008 that derailed her entire campaign. Trump needs to go full Sun Tzu on Bill.
Simply put, there is no amount of "buttsqueeze" that could ooze from the Hillary campaign that would suprise me.
She is entirely fecal, why would we expect better?
I suspect the fire-bombing of Bill Clinton’s home (Hope,AR) yesterday was probably done by a Clinton operative to gain sympathy for Hillary. See what the “haters” did?
Only problem: The lapdog press reveals it as a GOP dirty trick, several of the hookers spill their guts about being paid to do it, the story gets conflated to show that even Lewinsky was a GOP paid hooker, sent in to trip up poor Bill, and before you know it, Bill’s a hero who was sdduced into misbehaving.
No, just let Bill remain the lowlife bastard he is, and let Trump do his own thing.
When Bill was elected, we were told we were getting “two for the price of one” with Hillary being “co-president”.
Does the same “bargain price” apply to Hillary 2016? Will Bill be her “co-president”? Since Bill (or Hill/Bill) has already served two terms would not the 22nd Amendment prohibit Bill from being “co-president”?
Since Hillary has already ‘served’ two terms as “co-President”, should she be prevented from running for a third term?
(I guess it depends on what ‘is’ is)
That’s what I saying as well, Cruz I don’t think has it in him to go to the extent Trump will to end the Clinton holocaust once and for all.. For example I don’t think Cruz would ever make an ad with Juanita Broaddrick, but Trump would and in two seconds, why? Because the guy is absolutely fearless which is exactly what is needed to end the Clinton holocaust once and for all. Trump is going to absolutely obliterate her, he’s got every scandal on her from the past. 40 years while she’s got absolutely nothing on him. She’s going to make fun of his hair and he will bring up Vince Foster.
Trump hatred is so strong among the elites the WSJ is doing stories backing Billary?
I was wondering why Trump was still bashing Bush so hard:
1. The super money people gave a ton to Jeb Bush and Trump wants to ride him out of the race so he doesn’t blow that 50 million plus his campaign and PACs have on attack ads;
2. Attacking Bush as the ‘politics of the past’ is a nice way to get in voters minds, “Been there, done that.†And then he moves to Hillary Clinton. “We don’t need Bill Clinton’s third term in office. Can we even impeach a First Husband?â€
Bringing in Bill risks the baggage Bill has. Bill is the political version of Bill Cosby. In the war on women, Bill Clinton is a five star general.
It also risks making Hillary look like a front for a 3rd Clinton term - a banana republic-style tactic. Run a front candidate when you can’t run.
Risks as well making her look like she needs her man to come stand up for her when she gets in trouble.
"If the liberal you're arguing with doesn't become speechless with sputtering, impotent rage, you're not doing it right. People don't get angry when lies are told about them; they get angry when the truth is told about them. If you are not being called outrageous by liberals, you're not being outrageous enough. Start with the maximum assertion about liberals and then push the envelope, because as we know, their evil is incalculable... Nothing too extreme can be said about liberals, because it's all true." (How to talk to a liberal (if you must), 2004, p. 12)When reporting such attacks on Satan's daughter, Slick Willie, or other traitorous demonicrats, if fifth-column media leftist whores, like David, Chuckie, Lester, Gwen, George, and Scott, don't foam at the mouth or wet their pantieson TV, the attacks are far too mild and need to get much closer to the truth.
Donald Trump has started, but conservative now need to take up the slack and call out the lies, murder, and treachery of the Demonicrats (and RINOs), and what these hell-spawned vermin really are!
In each state where primaries are contested and the candidates make appearances, Republicans should point out that putting someone’s name on the state ballot is tantamount to an endorsement by the Legislature, which passes the ballot access laws. They should point out that the Clintons have been on the take from foreign governments - and ask why Hillary even deserves to be on the ballot. I would not expect a purple or blue state legislature to actually pass the law which the Clinton candidacy brings to the fore as an issue - but it sure would put Democrats on the defensive.
- Hillary announced that when they left the WH the Clintons were “dead broke.”
- Now they are in control of, reportedly, up towards a quarter of a billion dollars.
- Reportedly, at least some of the mega payments to the Clintons came from foreign governments. Some in the form of honoraria for speeches by Bill, some in the form of donations to the Clinton Foundation.
- Either way, acceptance of "any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state” is strictly verboten to any federal officer, let alone the Secretary of State. Unless, of course, Congress consents to it. Which consent was never requested, let alone granted.
Agree about the polling. Can Hillary be desperate enough that she’s trying to play her favorite “I am Bill’s victim” card, by having Trump rehearse all the Clinton horrors? Or is this a distraction while something else goes down (another TIA recovery?)?
Except for Bill’s failure to take out Bin Ladin and Al Qaeda; his “wall of separation” that allowed 9-11 to happen; sale of office (Marc Rich pardon, Johnny Chung, etc.); multiple rapes and abuses of women with Hillary combating “Bimbo Eruptions” as an accessory after the fact; stealing White House furnishings; conviction for perjury; serial bank fraud: Pedophile Island; Bill’s “Energizer” and other current harlots — will they be living in the White House?; Gee Bill, Hillary said her “private server” was part of YOUR presidential office — yes or no —was that true?; etc., Trump will not have anything to say.
Prediction: Bill will give a few private speech-lets (probably for pay) over the next week or so, then slink away.
When I saw ‘hillary’ + ‘secret weapon’ in the title my first thought was of Craig Livingstone in the basement illegally xopying FBI files for her,
Jeffrey Epstein
There is a secret weapon and I have named it above. A secret weapon that can put Hillary out of the race. The Epstein thing is getting very ripe as I type this. Or maybe very rotten is a better way to describe things.
An adult aged intern is one thing as tacky as that is, minors is something else altogether.
Note that Epstein hung out with Kevin Spacey and Bill Clinton at the same time. Spacey is said to like underage boys so maybe Bill Clinton’s “tastes” are broader than people may know?
I wonder which candidate has the stones to bring up the Clinton/Epstein story? The answer to that is only one candidate - Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.