Clinton, Rubio, Cruz Receive Foreign Policy Advice From Same Consulting Firm

The Intercept ^ | Dec. 18 2015 | Lee Fang

[AndyJackson]

Opposing the invasion of a weak country by a stronger neighbor is provoking war?

It's a lot more complicated than that. As Kissinger put it "the demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one."

[basil]

When you have been a Freeper a long time, you learn to separate the wheat from the chafe.

IOW, you figure out which ones make the most sense.

[Mariner]

"But it has little more meaning than using the same plumber or caterer or surgeon"

Unless that caterer has distributed e coli to a dozen different parties, or if the plumbers work often leads to sh*t in your bath tub.

Or, if the surgeon has killed dozens with his failed, experimental techniques.

Then it would matter a great deal.

[SoFloFreeper]

you would know. :)

[little jeremiah]

Is it? He seems to be all in for provoking war with Russia and supporting our “friends”. On H1B Viwas and his initial support for TPA (til Obama changed it) his differences are only by degrees.

I’d rather that pols didn’t use consulting firms. It opens the opportunity to be manipulated.

---

It more than opens the opportunity to be manipulated, it guarantees it.

[Don Corleone]

“Uniparty Central”?

[mac_truck]

I’m not sure which is worse, the incestious grouping of former GWB and HRC officals peddling their influence or the dopey GOP candidates who are paying them for foreign policy advice.

[rmlew]

And yet they have different foreign policies. It’s almost as if the title and tenor the piece are completely misleading.