Posted on 01/01/2016 6:38:14 PM PST by Libloather
This. Most excellent.
Is there a difference any more?
Would that include tube mags like a nylon .22 or 10-22?
Gonna have to go to belt fed weapons if they outlaw long mags.
That is the real reason we have an open border.
I wonder if he ever knows what the second amendment to our constitution says.
Has he even read the 2nd Amendment? Clear and concise, how can he ignore it? Does he not understand the phrase ‘shall not be infringed?’ That phrase closes the issue - or should.
End of discussion...
I know he doesn’t care about it but if he ever discussed it he would employ the usual sophistry about militias. As childish as he is he might even trot out the “Founders couldn’t imagine anything more powerful than muskets” tripe.
it is being billed as
——A BILL
To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes.——
Where In the constitution did it say the right to bear arms is not unlimited?
This bill is sick
When does it get voted on?
no, they are all corrupt and subject to blackmail
that was the message of Hastert.
Obuma has always been against America and if he thinks he can take the guns away, he’s going to be out of office suddenly....
People are upset, and angry at him, House and Senate and they will not put up with anymore, he had better watch what he is doing, Americans are famous for taking their country back, something he must have missed by being a ‘foreign aid student’....
Real bright shooting in the air. That’s Middle East garbage.
No idea. It seems to have been bouncing around in comittee, then they took their holiday recess.
If I were a candidate - I would clearly and publicly warn Federal agencies and employees: In a very short, this administration will be over. Anyone who implements unconstitutional, unilateral actions without Congressional approval will make themselves and their agencies an immediate target for punishment and prosecution.
Good Idea.
I wonder if any of them would have the guts to do it, even if they shared the sentiment.
He needs to be bitch slapped
He likes it..the harder, the better..
From the government's own OPM website:
http://archive.opm.gov/constitution_initiative/oath.asp
"I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God." 5 U.S.C. §3331
"As Federal civil servants, we take an oath of office by which we swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. The Constitution not only establishes our system of government, it actually defines the work role for Federal employees - "to establish Justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any Federal civilian that violates their oath to follow the illegal "orders" of Obama are themselves guilty. They may as well employ the Nuremberg Defense. They will still be guilty and held accountable for violating their oath and the Constitution.
ping to 57
These “gun control” actions will either be useless and trivial or they will be useless and unconstitutional. The occupant of our White House cannot legally do anything significant to infringe on our individual, God-given right to keep and bear arms without Congress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.