Skip to comments.This is my response to a man who wanted to know why I asked the questions as rudely as I did
Posted on 01/04/2016 7:17:50 AM PST by doug from upland
This is my response to a man who wanted to know why I asked the questions as rudely as I did;
Thank you for asking what I was so concerned with. I appreciate your interest. It all started when I saw Juanita Broaddrick give an hour long interview on Dateline NBC to Lisa Myers in 1999 where she said she was raped by Bill Clinton in 1978. You can find a video of it on Youtube.
I believed her so when Al Gore was running for president, I asked him if he believed her too because I was shocked that women's groups like NOW were not demanding answers. Gore told me that he doesn't know the story but that I should forgive Clinton anyway as if I was asking about an affair, not a crime.
After Broaddrick saw that question on TV, she called me and I asked her all the questions people were throwing at me about why she may not be telling the truth. I was in a support group at the time for rape and sexual assault survivors and I know this subject better than I want to. We also visited convicted sex offenders and rapists at the state prison and discussed our side of the issue with them and listened to theirs. It was very informative, to say the least. I often felt sympathy for some of the things they went through but made it clear that acting on their anger or selfishness or whatever made them do that was never OK.
During the call Broaddrick made to me back then, she told me that she felt that Hillary personally threatened her soon after the attack, threatened to keep quiet about it. I specifically asked if she could have thought it was consensual. Hillary had spoken of the incident on a car ride to the event, Broaddrick told me, unaware that the driver was someone Broaddrick knew through a friend, things were said that made her believe that Hillary knew about it and did not think it was consensual.
At any rate, it is very weird that Hillary now says on the campaign trail that women should be believed when they say they have been raped(she is correct about that, false reports are rare, it happens but it is not the norm) but told a questioner on the trail last month that she does not believe Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey(who has said that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted her by grabbing her breast when they were in the Oval Office together).
Clinton told the questioner that she does not believe them because of evidence against them. I would like to know what that is. It is true that Broaddrick told her story very reluctantly and first said nothing happened in an effort to make it all go away but when the FBI started asking her about it, she was advised that she cannot lie to them. even if she wants to.That is when she told the whole story to them.
I have met Hillary 3 times before today and twice I have asked her if she believes Broaddrick. She told me she does not know who she is in 07 in Nashua and in July of this past summer in Gorham, she told me that again and that she doesn't care about this.
How then can she evaluate evidence of some kind about a woman she does not know or care to find out about? I am sick of playing the game, I get it, Hillary believes Broaddrick was raped and that is why she will not discuss it in any sincere way. That is what drove me to do what I did today, my concern for sexual assault survivors.
If I could have brought this issue up in any polite way or if people in her campaign really did follow up with me by calling me, I would never have been so impolite. I know I was impolite but in this whole scenario, you are angry at the wrong person, save that anger for Bill Clinton for being a sexual predator or for the woman who enables him-not me. I hope that explains everything you wanted to know and thank you again for your interest and for asking.
The left’s hypocritical chickens are coming home to roost.
Excellent post, thank you.
Will MSN have the guts to report this accurately
The wilting lilies on the left are suddenly all about being polite. Hilarious.
, you are angry at the wrong person, save that anger for Bill Clinton for being a sexual predator or for the woman who enables him-not me
theres anger against the victim who tells and none for the rapists...
The press is trying to portray this whole issue as “Bill’s former sex life” and we should not let them use that spin whenever it’s tried.
This is about Hillary protecting a serial sexual predator, and not just by looking the other way, but by actively trying to discredit his accusers and in some cases, even threatening them with harm. Kathleen Willey tells how one of her pets is killed under suspicious circumstances, for example.
Bill Clinton is going to be hiding out at Bill Cosby’s estate by next week to avoid hecklers and reporters.
It fits with her own egregious misconduct, beginning with being thrown off the Watergate investigation. She's a criminal, a conspirator with criminals, and an accessory before and after the fact to crime. Any 'normal' person with her record would be in prison.
Oh, yes ... I saw a “Hillary! for Prison 2016” sign beside Interstate 70, yesterday.
In the Peoples’ Republic of Maryland.
I want to know more about his time with Epstein.
I don't care if her name is Hillary Clinton or Jane Doe, if there is something in the past with that person and she is out in the public running for any kind of office, the public has the right to know about the details...
Hillary shouldn't even be running for office, she should be in prison, and so should Bill Clinton but the media keeps shielding them and it's wrong...we need to keep bringing out what they have done, both of them until they are completely out of politics or in prison...
For decades, the media narrative protected Bill Cosby from the consequences of his (alleged) actions. That narrative is no longer useful, and his life is about to be destroyed.
For decades, an equivalent media narrative has protected Bill Clinton from the consequences of his (allegedly even worse) actions, but that narrative is still useful to our corrupt media. At least as long as they need Hillary to hold power, or have the potential to grasp power, and as long as Hillary wants to protect and enable Bill Clinton, he’s safe.
Is Cosby's estate on Orgy Island?
How did you get in without a disguise?
Thanks for posting this. Katherine is a very brave woman.
Thank you, Katherine.
I’m patiently waiting for someone to ask about his recent friendship with a convicted sex offender and his trips to a private island stocked with underage girls. We know he made the trips as Clinton’s name was on the manifests for the flights. I think everyone is waiting for a youngster to give a statement, but all we really need is the facts we can prove. He’s a convicted pedophile that own’s his own island, that invited Bill to spend time down there, and we know he did. Just asking the questions and demanding answers will put the spotlight on this pig family.
The biggest enabler and criminal even, in my opinion, is the media.
They’ve known about this story for years.
They’re liars and hypocrites. To say Hillary is a champion of women’s rights is the biggest lie of all. The hypocrisy is flowing all around them, like a molten mass of lava flows out of a Hawaiian volcano.
They hide Bill Clinton’s sexual abuse and RAPE, but go hammer and tongs against Trump for saying schlonged.
Tell you what, if MINE was big enough, I’d SCHLONG every member of the media with it until they were bloody and unconscious, laying on the ground spitting up gravel!
Bunch of bastards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.