Skip to comments.The People at the Center of Abortion Politics
Posted on 01/26/2016 9:41:24 AM PST by wagglebee
At first glance, a reader might get the impression that the title of this article refers to individuals such as candidates for political office, abortion advocates like President Obama, or opposing cultural pressure groups. If any of these come to mind, then you should think again.
The people to whom I am referring are the preborn—the innocent children whose right to life is bandied about constantly by the media, the debaters, the pundits, and others. It sometimes seems that the phrase “abortion issue” is really all they want to write about or discuss. It is rare to see a reference to the individuals whose lives are snuffed out by this “issue.”
For example, the New York Times recently published an update on various frozen embryo cases currently being litigated. According to the article, “The cases are part of the broader ‘personhood’ debate that has become central to abortion politics. Advocates in many states are seeking laws that would make embryos full legal persons at fertilization—blocking not only abortion but also some forms of contraception and assisted reproduction. None have passed, and some anti-abortion groups say such laws go too far.”
Ah! There you have it! In those few words the reporter has delivered the essence of why it is that the people at the center of abortion politics—the preborn children—are usually ignored or hung out to dry for political reasons.
Let’s examine this further and perhaps we will uncover the reasons for the ongoing confusion accompanying the simple term “human being.”
“Personhood” is not a debate topic, but rather a term applied in the philosophical sense to an individual human being who is easily identified at his biological beginning as unique in every way because he possesses his own DNA—not his mother’s, not his father’s, not his identical twin if he happens to come into being asexually. In other words, personhood means that each human being is uniquely individual. No debate is required. Yet we see a perpetual lack of understanding of this in the twisted, corrupt definition of who the person is prior to birth. The debate began when seven Supreme Court justices arrogantly ruled that, prior to birth, preborn human beings were not persons.
In fact, U. S. Supreme Court judge Blackmun made that crystal clear in the Roe v. Wade decision when he wrote: “If this suggestion of [fetal] personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [14th] amendment.”
Further, the term “abortion politics” obfuscates the simple fact that, no matter what seven justices on the Supreme Court said or ruled, the science is undeniable. A human being begins at his beginning and killing him by any means is a crime that breaks the natural law. Sadly, it is not a crime according to man’s laws in the United States.
After 43 years of this travesty, the fact is that many of those defending the right to life of the preborn human being have themselves continually become mired in the political process and dragged the babies down that road with them. Hence, the politics has become the end game—a reason why some pro-lifers will argue that the pursuit of any recognition of personhood in the legal sense is a waste of time.
Such thinking is flawed, though. And the larger challenge has become helping average men and women of every age see that abortion is not about a personal choice, but about individual human beings who are at risk because abortion is readily available and committed on an all-too-frequent basis.
In the final analysis, the truth is that, as a pro-life community, we have not gone far enough in teaching others the facts about the preborn human being. In far too many cases we have become political hacks. So until we get back to teaching the truth first, any legislative pursuit will fall short.
The people at the center of abortion politics—the preborn human beings—are waiting for us to get it right. Until we do, babies are at risk. Until we do, countless numbers of them will continue to die.
This is 100% correct.
We should be focused on personhood and nothing else. Abortion needs to be ENDED, not regulated.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
Read, and then re-read, for this statement sheds light on many of the other sad consequences of our failing to "teach" rising generations the "truth" about America's founding philosophy, as clearly expressed in its Declaration of Independence, with its emphasis on the role of Divine Providence; Creator-endowed life, and liberty; a Supreme Judge of the world; and Natural Rights and Laws to protect them.
"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them." - Thomas Jefferson
These were the truths America's founders insisted should be taught to rising generations in order to preserve the liberty for which they been willing to sacrifice their lives, property, and sacred honor.
It is important to recognize that this issue of personhood is full rights is age-old.
Age-old is the premise that might makes right ... so children (and the aged and handicapped and of course the pre-born) are going to be the one’s without the might whose rights are either not recognized at all or they are given lesser importance.
This whole premise started well before the abortion issue took hold in the USA and Roe v Wade which only ensconced the “might makes right” issue into law. For it to do that, the premise had to be accepted by the larger society on a large scale ... which it had already done for many decades, even centuries.
We need a holistic approach to valuing the lives of all people who do not have “might” in this society, especially children and the pre-born but not exclusively them.
God bless Judie Brown and American Life League.
They are among the few who I would truly classify as having been consistently principled over the long haul.
That's why most people have never heard of Judie Brown or the American Life League, the general public seems to thing being pro-life is about keeping abortion "safe and legal and rare."
You can't fulfill equal protection under the law incrementally. Either the God-given, unalienable rights of all are protected equally, or they are not.
You are exactly right.
Incrementalism was tried for three-quarters of a century with slavery, and it only made things worse. Incrementalism regarding slavery not only took the lives of over 600,000 Americans, it nearly destroyed our Republic. People generally don't realize that if the Union hadn't been preserved, our principles probably wouldn't have survived even in the northern states.
Incrementalism with abortion has resulted in nearly 60 million deaths and NOTHING the so-called "pro-life movement" has done has had any effect. Any fluctuations in abortion rates are the result of demographic and economic changes and nothing more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.