Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China takes Philippine atoll
Philstar ^ | March 2nd, 20016 | Jaime Laude

Posted on 03/01/2016 6:17:32 PM PST by ch.man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: AlexW; Berosus; buwaya; dagogo redux; DFG; Doofer; Fai Mao; knarf; LadyDoc; Mark17; ...

PIng


21 posted on 03/01/2016 6:31:58 PM PST by ASA Vet (Jus Soli + Jus Sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

The Philippines doesn’t have a Navy that can defend its waters against any nation.
Its useful only for counterinsurgency and smuggling patrols, and amphibious/logistics support for the Phil Army and Marines. And undersized even for that.
It has zero ASW and AA capability, and the biggest antisurface weapon its got are WW2 three-inch guns.
As an ex-Philippine navy ROTC cadet.


22 posted on 03/01/2016 6:32:46 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

“Sales at Harbor Freight are way down...”

And also at Walmart.


23 posted on 03/01/2016 6:33:40 PM PST by Amish with an attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: soycd

There is no Islamo threat in those islands - they aren’t habitable.


24 posted on 03/01/2016 6:33:53 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ch.man; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; ..

So, what does the South China Morning Pest say about this seizure of apparent Philippine territory?

PING!


25 posted on 03/01/2016 6:34:37 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Terrorism, the thing that shall not be named by the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Sadly, the Philippines has no ships that can approach the Chinese undetected to deploy underwater demolitions men. It HAS a few of these fellows, but there is no way to get them there.


26 posted on 03/01/2016 6:36:01 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MCF

Time for us to leave Japan and Korea as well. Those troops would be better used along the border.


27 posted on 03/01/2016 6:36:49 PM PST by Wilderness Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ch.man

Well.......Maybe Obama will cancel his golf outing....lol..

Probably not..


28 posted on 03/01/2016 6:36:55 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Luckily, that area is uninhabited. Any girls out there they will have to bring with them.


29 posted on 03/01/2016 6:37:09 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

> they aren’t habitable

Fair enough. I do know China takes no crap from islam trash like America does so they get a little slack.


30 posted on 03/01/2016 6:37:17 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ch.man
Both the ChiComs and Russia are on the move. They've been waiting for this moment for a long time.

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
______________________________________________________________

"Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants."

http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2005/09/war-games-russia-china-grow-alliance

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170287,00.html
______________________________________________________________

Sept 11, 2014

China and Russia to build major seaport: report

China and Russia will build one of the largest ports in north-east Asia on Russia's Sea of Japan coast, reports say, in a further sign of the powerhouses' growing alliance.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-11/china-and-russia-to-build-major-seaport-report/5738036

31 posted on 03/01/2016 6:38:49 PM PST by ETL (You can lead a Trump supporter to critical facts & info, but you can't make him/her think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wilderness Conservative

So you would rather the Chinese and Russians take what they want while we are content to only protect the country from the Mexican invasion?

Harharhar...

No wonder this country is so screwed....


32 posted on 03/01/2016 6:39:44 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: soycd

They are seizing the SouthEast Asian shipping lanes.
Look at a map.
This means they will be able to blockade most international trade for seven-eight countries, from Singapore to Taiwan. Thats an explicit threat.


33 posted on 03/01/2016 6:40:36 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: buwaya; ch.man

Thanks for your posts in this very interesting topic/thread. BTTT!


34 posted on 03/01/2016 6:41:15 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

The PI must regret us leaving Subic and Clarke.


35 posted on 03/01/2016 6:41:28 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

What’s to stop them? ubama and Valerie Jarrett and John Kerry?


36 posted on 03/01/2016 6:42:30 PM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Yes.
They are desperate to get a US base now.


37 posted on 03/01/2016 6:42:44 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

>This means they will be able to blockade most international trade for seven-eight countries

If they blockade goods going to islam countries, I am all for it. Starve the evil and feed the good.


38 posted on 03/01/2016 6:44:10 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

The Russians and Chinese wont get everything they want. But I would be willing to let them try.


39 posted on 03/01/2016 6:46:49 PM PST by Wilderness Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

It’s not about habitation ... it’s strategic militarily


40 posted on 03/01/2016 6:47:46 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson