NY court reinstates fraud case Trump said was ‘largely won’

Yahoo ^ | March 1, 2016 | Michael Isikoff

[mkjessup]

No, she’s just an unimaginative Trump-hating troll. The classic one-trick pony.

Still trying to win over those Conservative votes for the General Election I see.

No, I'm telling the truth and some folks (like you) don't like that.

Stay at it, with any luck all by your lonesome you can increase Donalds unlikable numbers.

If someone is so weak willed that they allow individual opinions to sway their minds, they probably shouldn't even be anywhere near a polling place.

Isn't it at this point you ping your fellow brownshirts and go for another banning?

Who I do or do not ping is none of your freakin' business, and since you obviously didn't get the memo, there ISN'T "another banning" in store because there hasn't even been ONE at this point, not since I signed up in March 2003, 7 years before you came sniffing around. You must be thinking of one of your more rabid Cruz fanatics who have been given 3 days in the box when they got a little too rambunctious.

Stay strong little feller. It won't be long before you realize your emperor has no clothes.

I got your 'little feller' right >>>HERE<<<

[nclaurel]

Isn’t it funny how Cruzers fret about some people in a class action suit lead by an attorney who served recent jail time. One person has actually asked out of the suit. Really important since they all gave the class great reviews.

But it is ok that Cruz has the once disliked Bush team on his campaign and is financed by a tax cheat Mercer but since it is the anointed/ sworn in Cruz going all establishment it is just fine.

In my 67 years I have never seen any party run a primary based on defeating their forerunner and not on what is best for America.

[imardmd1]

Another famous New Yorker once said, “It ain’t over ‘til it’s over.” Remember this, Donald.

[Pox]

Who knows? I guess I better hurry and change my support from Mr. Trump to some other candidate as he now has no possible chance of winning the election come November!

Oh me, Oh my.

[VRWCarea51]

Once again WRONG.

I have repeatedly told you been here since 1997-98, Yeah I know you can copy and paste my sign up date but you can't seem to do an archive search to see my posts from before then.

Lazy...as in you won't look at or for a fact to disputes your mindset. Funny how that works. Kind of like Ignoring 40 years of Donald's life as a sleazy N.Y. Liberal who bought politicians.

I know you know that. But Like most all Trump supporters, fact based posts mean nothing to you.

I got your 'little feller' right >>>HERE<<<

I know you do, it seems to be a common trait with you trumpanzees. Love u to Man. Kisses!

[mkjessup]

Yeah so what, you claim to be here since '97 or '98, I could claim the same thing but as you've been told already, I deal in facts and in truth, something you play fast and loose with.

Your hatred of Trump blinds you to everything else, and I just hope that when YOU realize that Trump is not only going to be the GOP nominee AND our next President that you will find the self restraint NOT to follow the crowd as they try to escape reality:



And if not?

Watch that first step bub.

[VRWCarea51]

Hahahah That’s great.

One problem there Ace. You’re the one taking the plunge supporting an life long Liberal N.Y. Democrat who has a sudden change of direction.

Good luck with that.

[AmericanInTokyo]

I've examined nearly all of the responses here and just by chance saw an old college psych 101 textbook of my son's laying around and took note of this, as relates to "rationalizing":

..."rationalization occurs "when the individual deals with emotional conflict or internal or external stressors by concealing the true motivations for his or her own thoughts, actions, or feelings through the elaboration of reassuring or self serving but incorrect explanations."

[VRWCarea51]

For the record, I don’t hate Donald Trump. Have no reason to.

I do hate the Idolatry. I hate the ignorance, the sheer will to ignore the facts and history to believe something he has never endorsed or participated in, in his life.

I hate the attacks against anyone that dare question his lack of honesty.

That’s what I hate.

I will also hate the fact that ignorance puts him in office and he starts doing exactly what he did for the 40 years before 2012. Being a Democrat.

That’s where my anger is at.

[mkjessup]

Your anger is what clouds your vision. So take that anger which is consuming your soul, and tell Phyllis Schlafly and Sarah Palin how much smarter and conservative you are then they are. Or maybe they’re just deluded and/or senile in comparison to your superior intellect?

[chris37]

I would say that selective outrage is very common around election time.

As far as the GOP goes, I think that they have demonstrated countless times now and in any number of ways that they have their interests at heart, and not one thing else.

Americans have no friends within government.

None.

[VRWCarea51]

Half term jounalist Sarah? Well when you are kissing her quitting back side ask her about that Kelly Ayotte and Nikki Haley support/endorsements will ya?

[morphing libertarian]

Dear yahoo, more converge of the Clinton investigations. Thank you

[mkjessup]

Half term jounalist Sarah? Well when you are kissing her quitting back side ask her about that Kelly Ayotte and Nikki Haley support/endorsements will ya?

Why ask me?

Ask her good friend in this picture, I'm sure you recognize him.

I'll let you ping him at your convenience.

[morphing libertarian]

coverage

[Dagnabitt]

The democrats likely have a half-dozen former Trump Univ customers lined up ready to make sad-face videos for the general election. By November, folks in Ohio, Florida and Virginia are going to know these folks by name.

[Logical me]

Which is the worst. National Review or Yahoo. Toss up.

[VRWCarea51]

Hey she used the term to describe the only Conservative in the race. If she doesn’t like to the blowback....

Let her deal with the fall out. If you or her is upset at the tone or language perhaps she should change it.

Pinging “all” did what you claimed I should do.....didn’t it? You fool no one!

[mkjessup]

As you like to say *WRONG*, pinging ‘all’ does not do what you think it does, it only pings those who have posted IN the thread, not anyone outside the thread, and if you’ve really been skulking around since ‘97 / ‘98, you ought to know that.

Try the decaf pal, and work on that case of premature exasperation, it’ll eat ya up.