Skip to comments.
Pat Buchanan: Trump as Nominee Could Transition GOP to ‘a Different, New, Exciting, Robust Party’
Breitbart ^
| March 24, 2016
| by JEFF POOR
Posted on 03/25/2016 7:05:26 AM PDT by Hojczyk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: Theodore R.
"Pat won the NH primary by a narrow margin in 1996; otherwise, not much else." Yes, but the party seems to be turning toward a populist/agrarian philosophy - which Pat (and now Trump) advocate.
41
posted on
03/26/2016 12:05:48 PM PDT
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: Da Bilge Troll
Yes, but the party seems to be turning toward a populist/agrarian philosophyYou got it backward. Trump wants to RE industrialize the USA. Are you ok?
42
posted on
03/26/2016 12:07:19 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: LostPassword
1) Pay attention to voters If Trump is NOT the nominee, The Establishment wins.
The Establishment will ALWAYS ignore the voters and do ANYTHING to maintain their power base for BIG $$$$'s.
That's what they do.
Only Trump has the ability to not only stand up to the Crony Socialists in the Establishment but to destroy them.
And THAT is why they fear Trump.
43
posted on
03/26/2016 12:17:07 PM PDT
by
newfreep
To: X-spurt
55% disagree with your post...
44
posted on
03/26/2016 12:20:15 PM PDT
by
newfreep
To: central_va
"You got it backward. Trump wants to RE industrialize the USA" High tariffs will not reindustrialize anything.
45
posted on
03/26/2016 1:01:59 PM PDT
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: Da Bilge Troll
High tariffs will not reindustrialize anything. The USA had very high tariffs up to 1913. I wonder how we ever industrialized with those in place? /sarc
46
posted on
03/26/2016 1:04:36 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
I voted for Buchanan once.
47
posted on
03/26/2016 1:09:50 PM PDT
by
Theophilus
(Always vote. Always vote your conscience. God wins every election.)
To: central_va
"The USA had very high tariffs up to 1913" Now there's a reason to raise tariffs if there ever was one.
48
posted on
03/26/2016 1:17:04 PM PDT
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: Da Bilge Troll
Now there's a reason to raise tariffs if there ever was one. Income taxes replaced tariffs. Which do you prefer?
49
posted on
03/26/2016 1:18:17 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Hojczyk
... or he could just stay caught up in high school name calling ...
50
posted on
03/26/2016 1:20:46 PM PDT
by
x
To: central_va
"Income taxes replaced tariffs. Which do you prefer?" Is that the only choice?
51
posted on
03/26/2016 1:32:02 PM PDT
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson