Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The ad itself mentioned Cruz by name. Cui bono?

Well, it seemed like a good idea at the time. Like Watergate.

3 posted on 03/27/2016 1:37:03 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

According to the experts, former CIA
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3414444/posts?page=1#1

From the above article, dissected by former CIA deception experts :

“...we were struck by the volume of deceptive behavior that we identified in these statements.

Behaviorally, when the facts are the ally of an individual, he or she almost always tends to focus on the facts of the matter at hand.

In this case, if the key fact was that he had not had these affairs, Cruz would almost certainly have been much more strongly focused on the denial. That is, he very likely would have made a point of explicitly stating something along the lines of, “I did not have these affairs.”

>>>>Ted never categorically denies having the affairs, does he?<<<<


10 posted on 03/27/2016 1:39:24 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson