Skip to comments.College Football lawsuit over sex "assault"
Posted on 04/25/2016 1:39:12 PM PDT by mad puppy
click here to read article
If he’s a leftist then good.
Completely right, and I apologize.
This case is egregious and I hope he ends up OWNING the school.
This is as bad, if not worse, than Duke LaCrosse.
I think in addition to some wheelbarrows of cash, the head of the school needs to be fired and the head of the athletic department needs to apologize to him and his family.
“Take away: women are not capable of consenting to sex.”
Simple solution, all sex outside of marriage should be considered rape. Its the only way for colleges to be sure.
So if someone is of a different political persuasion then you cheer at them being falsely accused & their life ruined??? What a horrifying person you are.......
The young women today are more aggressive then the men.
“Simple solution, all sex outside of marriage should be considered rape. Its the only way for colleges to be sure.”
You joke, but it seems old fashioned Biblical morality is going to be imposed by political correctness.
God is a funny dude sometimes.
He uses Pharaoh for His purposes.
The Obama Administration has taken the Title 9 of the education code that said you had to be equal for boys and girls, which led to cutting men’s teams or adding girls’ lacrosse and softball, to a new extreme. Their NEW interpretations of this include:
* if your college gets federal funding, the college has to adopt processes in the name of fighting rape culture such as: not informed of charges, no right to an attorney at hearings, ability to expel you or ban you from school for all but classes if found guilty, inability to cross-examine the rape accuser, broad definition of rape, minimal guilt standard (50%+smidgen), limited to no ability to give evidence or call witnesses to defend yourself, permission for the investigating organization to also be the tribunal source.
In the most egregious cases, men were found guilty by schools of rape and expelled when police did not pursue criminal charges, a guy told to avoid contact with a student because he merely LOOKED like her rapist from across the country, seeking to punish a professor who suggested a raped female student go to the police instead of women’s studies tribunal, and a female feminist writer who wrote an article questioning official rape statistics of one in five.
* if you get federal funding, you have to let boys in dresses use the showers and bathrooms of the gender they identify with or you lose federal funding
It’s vain for you to misrepresent what I said when anyone can scroll up and read it. I said leftist. Beyond false witness your analysis is poor. Cheer is an understatement.
Take away... Sharia law coming soon to a neighborhood near you. It is the ISlamic cult that says women are to blame if they are raped. The women in their eyes if not covered from head to toe blames the woman for the urges the man cannot control.
Nah. He should apply to UNC. So long as he plays a sport, he won't even have to go to class...
You decided to go all pig dog with your comment, so deal. I misrepresented you not one whit.
“Take away... Sharia law coming soon to a neighborhood near you. It is the ISlamic cult that says women are to blame if they are raped. The women in their eyes if not covered from head to toe blames the woman for the urges the man cannot control.”
How do you get that out of a story about a male being prosecuted by a college for sex that the female says was 100% consensual?
Stupid comment of the month award!
I’ve spend time with Grant and his Dad. Our kids played 8th grade football on the same team for a season; then against each other for 4 years of HS ball; then with each other again down at CSU-P. Solid family. Solid kid. Perfect? Of course not.
Not sure of their politics. Nor do they matter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.