Posted on 05/07/2016 10:44:27 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
There should not 1000 other cemeteries. Why would you want your husbands’ ashes to be buried amongst the racists?
Mexicans hate themselves and want to be associated with white people...even in death.
If its private, they can do whatever they want.
If its private, they can do whatever they want.”
The question to be answered would be, “Is a cemetery ‘public accommodation’?”
If it is, and civil rights under the law remain with you after death, the cemetery is going to lose.
More bulls*** about nothing-MALDEF is showing their ignorance once again-most Latinos are Caucasian/white-some darker, some lighter, like any other ethnic group-I have light olive skin-I have relatives who are both lighter and darker, and we are all of Latino ancestry. Some Latinos from the Caribbean are considered Black, the ones from the Philippines are more Asian...
That woman should just take her husband’s ashes to another cemetery-one that isn’t operated by people too ignorant to be real...
“That woman should just take her husbands ashes to another cemetery-one that isnt operated by people too ignorant to be real...”
—
They are no more concerned about the ashes than the gays who wanted wedding cakes are concerned about cakes.
It’s the agenda.
Period.
.
1910? I thought all hispanics were illegal aliens?!!! We dont need more anchor corpses.
She can’t do a thing if it’s private.
I find this hard to believe it being 2 hours from the Mexican border. Is she trying to start something using her dead husband’s ashes? Ashes usually aren’t buried in cemeteries. Is this even what he wanted? She could easily just scatter them when the caretaker wasn’t around. Her story smells.
There are white Mexicans ass.
Call in The Magnificent Seven.
Of course it is-and that’s why the woman should not let her husband’s burial be used in that way-she is just as ignorant as MALDEF for doing so...
Thank you, sir...
“She cant do a thing if its private.”
That’s not exactly correct. If it were a privately owned apartment complex, they could not refuse a customer based their being Hispanic.
Obviously, the difference here is that the prospective tenant is dead.
Are being protected from discrimination when they are dead?
FO
But it was okay that there were Mexicans who died defending the Alamo.
What your butthurt? Use some lube.
Unless it’s a family-only cemetery (private property where relatives bury their own) they will probably lose the case.
I think how most cemeteries work is you actually have a deed for the plot you purchase, or you have a lease if it’s rented (not sure how an eviction would work there!).
In other words, it’s a land transaction and therefore falls under the jurisdiction of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
That act wasn’t always followed, however, and various cases ultimately resulted in what we have today - no racial discrimination in the sale or rental of publicly or privately held property. Race includes ethnic traits such as, national origin, language, etc..
Cases of note if you want to google/research:
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896, upheld segregation.
Brown v. Board of Education 1954, overturned Plessy.
Jones v. Mayer 1968, found constitutional basis for 1866 Act.
Of course, as long as no one sues you, you can pretty much do what you want which is probably why this particular cemetery has been getting away with it.
Sounds terrible but why should this lady want her hubbys remains strewn around with all that white trash? XD
“Ashes usually arent buried in cemeteries.”
Not quite. My parents and in-laws’ cremains are buried in cemeteries. Arlington National Cemetery has a very large vault for cremains. Some people choose to scatter the ashes; others bury the cremains in the ground as they would a coffin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.