Skip to comments.
Muslim Elected Mayor of London
FrontPage Mag ^
| 05/09/2016
| Robert Spencer
Posted on 05/09/2016 10:11:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Labour Party candidate Sadiq Khan, a Muslim, has been elected mayor of London, and the international Left is thrilled. Son of a Pakistani bus driver, champion of workers rights and human rights, and now Mayor of London. Congrats, @SadiqKhan. H, tweeted Hillary Clinton. Likewise happy are Islamic supremacists worldwide: members of the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), the party of Pakistans Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and the majority party in the nations National Assembly, held up a sign emblazoned: Heartiest Congratulation [sic] to Sadiq Khan 1st Muslim Mayor of London who defeated millionaire Jew Zec [sic] Goldsmith.
Those two messages summed up the dichotomy that characterizes the response to Sadiq Khan, and his own associations and intentions. Khan himself has written about the necessity to ensure that the perception of Islam is not tainted by those with extremist views. But his concern about this taint is relatively newly-minted: back in 2004, Khan spoke at a gender-segregated event entitled Palestine the suffering still goes on. Also on the bill was Daud Abdullah of the Muslim Council of Britain; who once led a boycott of Holocaust Memorial Day; Ibrahim Hewitt, the chairman of Interpal, which the U.S. Treasury Department has designated a global terrorist organization for funneling money to Hamas; Muslim leader Azzam Tamimi, who has called for the destruction of Israel and its replacement with an Islamic state; Muslim cleric Suliman Gani, who has echoed the Quran (4:34) in saying that women should be subservient to men; Ismail Adam Patel of Friends of Al-Aqsa, who has claimed that Hamas is no terrorist organization; and Church of England cleric Stephen Sizer, who has blamed Israel for the 9/11 jihad terror attacks.
Khan and his supporters have cried foul at Khans being held responsible for the views of these men. Their hypocrisy is evident, however, since the Lefts various dossiers against foes of jihad terror rely heavily on guilt by association, and then, even more tendentiously, on guilt by association built upon its earlier smears of others. Nonetheless, Khans appearance at that long-ago event should really only cause concern if Khan holds such views.
Does he? In a 2009 interview with Irans state-controlled Press TV, Khan criticized the British government for working with moderate Muslim organizations, saying: I wish we only spoke to people who agree with us. I can tell you that Ive spent the last months in this job speaking to all sorts of people. Not just leaders, not just organizations but ordinary rank and file citizens of Muslim faith and thats what good government is about, its about engaging with all stakeholders. You can talk about articles in the newspapers about what an organization might get but the point is you cant just pick and choose who you speak to, you cant just speak to Uncle Toms. The Uncle Toms in question were the Quilliam Foundation, which is a declared foe of Islamic extremism.
The ConservativeHome website lists other problematic aspects of Khans record, summarized by Raheem Kassam at Breitbart:
- A letter to the Guardian in the wake of the 7/7 terrorist bombings on London, blaming terrorism on British Government policy;
- His legal defence of Zacarias Moussaoui, a 9/11 terrorist who confessed to being a member of Al Qaeda;
- His chapter in a book, entitled Actions Against the Police which advises on how to bring charges against the police for racism. This is the same police force that Mr. Khan as London mayor would exercise authority over;
- His defence of Islamist extremist Azzam Tamimi. When Dr. Tamimi told a crowd that the publication of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed would cause the world to tremble and predicted Fire
throughout the world if they dont stop, Mr. Khan, who shared a platform with him, dismissed the threats as flowery language;
- His platform-sharing with Suliman Gani, a south London imam who has urged female subservience to men, and called for the founding of an Islamic state.
All this raises genuine concerns that as mayor of London, Khan will be less than energetic in protecting Londoners against jihad terrorism, or challenging Muslim communities in the U.K. to clean house. But when Khans opponents in the UK raised these and other concerns, they were excoriated as racist. Even the clueless and compromised dhimmi David Cameron was accused of racism for noting Khans hospitable attitude toward Islamic supremacists and jihadists.
This is the way these things always work nowadays: if you dare to mention that there are reasons to believe that a Muslim may be involved in jihad activity or, as in this case, clearly positive toward jihadists, its your fault, and a clear sign of racism and Islamophobia, even if the charges are accurate.
Leftists and Islamic supremacists have used such charges for years, and have succeeded in stigmatizing any discussion of how jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and make recruits among peaceful Muslims as bigotry which is why such discussions are so seldom pursued, and never in mainstream fora.
And so this Reuters story is all about how the wicked Conservatives are unapologetic for raising Khans ties to extremists. Reuters publishes no articles about the possible implications of Khans ties to extremists. The only concern is how racist the Conservative Party is.
In this environment, London marches happily into its brave new multicultural future, led by its Muslim mayor. Lets hope it doesnt blow up on them. But it probably will.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; london; londonmayor; mayor; muslim; muslimmayor; newyork; sadiqkhan; trump; unitedkingdom
To: SeekAndFind
London today...Detroit tomorrow.
2
posted on
05/09/2016 10:17:05 AM PDT
by
immadashell
(Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
To: SeekAndFind
3
posted on
05/09/2016 10:21:25 AM PDT
by
DBrow
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
Barbarians atwithin the walls.
5
posted on
05/09/2016 10:42:33 AM PDT
by
Samwell Tarly
(America is becoming "Harrison Bergeron" had it been envisioned by Ayn Rand)
To: immadashell
So when do they start doing beheadings on Tower Green again?
6
posted on
05/09/2016 10:46:24 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: SeekAndFind
....so how many Islamic nations have non-Muslim mayors?
7
posted on
05/09/2016 10:54:37 AM PDT
by
Tzimisce
To: SeekAndFind
Londoners deserve what they’re going to get. (more bearded ones, more rapes, more murders)
8
posted on
05/09/2016 11:35:58 AM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
To: SeekAndFind
Throughout the years the Brits have become more and more stupid and have adopted world peace and interracial and interreligious mongrels with wide accepting arms in the name of racial and religious harmony and now are blessed with their lifetime efforts to destroy their own culture and country. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS!
They learned well from Obama and now have destroyed the futures of all of their children and race. However, it makes them feel good....right now....but not later.
9
posted on
05/09/2016 12:11:34 PM PDT
by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: immadashell
And to be fair, the US has at least a President who clearly identifies with Muslims and has a big hate on for Christians.
To: immadashell
England has a very long history of fighting for its nationhood. All that to finally be vanquished by primitive people using head scarfs and political correctness to make them bow in submission.
It is time for someone to start beating Drake’s Drum.
11
posted on
05/09/2016 1:58:57 PM PDT
by
odawg
To: odawg
There are a lot of people who miss Margaret Thatcher. I wonder what happens when Argentina invades the Falklands again?
12
posted on
05/09/2016 3:47:47 PM PDT
by
immadashell
(Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson