Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six-Figure Fines for Gender Pronouns?
CNS News ^ | May 20, 2016 | L. Brent Bozell III and Tim Graham

Posted on 05/20/2016 9:27:47 AM PDT by Petrosius

The left used to congratulate itself on being the "Free Speech Movement." It used to celebrate the rebellious anarchists who used obscene words and forced sexually graphic images and conversations into the public sphere. Conservatives were the ones who insisted on decency in the public discourse and demanded regulation, both within the private sector and from the federal government, to protect the public from that obscenity.

But now, as the world turns upside down on sexuality and gender, leftists are becoming the ones who censor and fine. Instead of a Hays Code for decency, there's a Gays Code. Breaking the new language rules of the LGBT lobby can be very dear. Literally.

Washington Post blogger Eugene Volokh revealed that the New York City Commission on Human Rights has issued guidance that employers, landlords, professionals and businesses can now be fined up to $250,000 for not using an individual's preferred name, pronoun or title, under the New York City Human Rights Law, "regardless of the individual's sex assigned at birth, anatomy, gender, medical history, appearance, or the sex indicated on the individual's identification."

Their legal "guidance" insists: "Most individuals and many transgender people use female or male pronouns and titles. Some transgender and gender non-conforming people prefer to use pronouns other than he/him/his or she/her/hers, such as they/them/theirs or ze/hir." So, if you willfully and/or maliciously refuse to call a person "they" as preferred, you can be fined.

This mandated speech code not only reflects a rejection of biology, and not only endorses leftist cultural politics, but it is also a form of fascism never before seen in this country. You must use "ze" — an utterly made-up word — to refer to a person one day, and then you are required to use a different pronoun for the same person tomorrow — or whenever that person decides on a new term. So far, the pronouns include not just "ze," but "xe," "ve," "(f)ae" and "per," and more. Some even insisted on "Mx." instead of "Mr." or "Ms."

Let's call this code what is: transgender privilege.

"We can't be required to even display a license plate that says 'Live Free or Die' on our car, if we object to the message; that's what the court held in Wooley v. Maynard (1978)," Volokh argued. "But New York is requiring people to actually say words that convey a message of approval of the view that gender is a matter of self-perception rather than anatomy."

What's more, Volokh warned, the Big Apple grammar police have declared that "refusal to use a transgender employee's preferred name, pronoun, or title may constitute unlawful gender-based harassment." The label "harassment" in this case is important, Volokh notes, "because harassment law requires employers and businesses to prevent harassment by co-workers and patrons , not just by themselves or their own employees."

This punishment is not an empty threat. In 2012, Mirella Salemi, a Manhattan-based lesbian chef at a Mexican eatery, was awarded $1.6 million in damages by a New York county judge, because her employer, Edward Globokar, "threatened her soul" and held employee prayer meetings in the hopes of curing her of her sexuality. The fines were upheld in 2014.

President Obama's overweening imposition of a transgender-bathroom policy for all of the nation's schools makes it clear that the federal government will likely follow in New York City's footsteps. The Obama administration has already taken the view that existing federal sex-discrimination laws automatically apply to "gender identity." The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission views it as illegal under federal law to persistently call employees by the "wrong" (biologically correct) pronoun.

Male is female, and female is male. George Orwell's "1984" is here.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; liberalfascism; transgenderism; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 05/20/2016 9:27:47 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

“Leonard Tose has...lost it.”


2 posted on 05/20/2016 9:28:35 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Whatever happens in society you can bet that the government will want to cash in on it.

Whatever happened to forbidding “excessive fines”?


3 posted on 05/20/2016 9:31:43 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

:: Let’s call this code what is: transgender ::

NO! Let’s call this ^code^ for what it is: revenue enhancement.


4 posted on 05/20/2016 9:32:13 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
Just refer to all of these confused and flummoxed gender types as "it" and this non-problem is solved.

Easy-peasey.....

5 posted on 05/20/2016 9:35:25 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Free Speech?

Not in Obamaland.


6 posted on 05/20/2016 9:35:33 AM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

...So far, the pronouns include not just “ze,” but “xe,” “ve,” “(f)ae” and “per,” and more. Some even insisted on “Mx....

The word police are enforcing the use of gibberish words not even part of the English language.
They made up these “ sounds.”now the want to enforce their use under penalty of law.
What are we now? Canada?


7 posted on 05/20/2016 9:36:44 AM PDT by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
"IT" is the correct pronoun for these mental patients.
8 posted on 05/20/2016 9:37:56 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Sounds like a 1st Amendment case if there ever was one...............


9 posted on 05/20/2016 9:39:38 AM PDT by Red Badger (WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING TAGLINES!...........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

10 posted on 05/20/2016 9:40:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING TAGLINES!...........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

So what if those people don’t want those designations? Maybe they’ll think it derogatory and sue over that.


11 posted on 05/20/2016 9:42:01 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

I have to be fined and go to reeducation camp.

I don’t know how to pronounce “xe”. I don’t know what type of person would be addressed using that term.

I also don’t know all of the 54 recognized gender identities. So I need to be reeducated.


12 posted on 05/20/2016 9:43:43 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
employers, landlords, professionals and businesses can now be fined up to $250,000 for not using an individual's preferred name, pronoun or title

Just based on the word of the accuser? So if some tranny freak has it in for an employer or landlord, all it needs to do is make the claim that the accused used a pronoun not to its liking? No witnesses or recordings necessary? And what if the tranny freak accuser changes its pronoun preferences with the wind?

Ironic that leftists accuse Republicans of being "like the Taliban." Progs' totalitarian tendencies take a backseat to no one's.

13 posted on 05/20/2016 9:52:00 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I don’t know how to pronounce “xe”.

Ignorance of such important matters will be grounds for the death penalty in a few short years, at this rate.

14 posted on 05/20/2016 9:54:51 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

I think this would violate the 8th amendment of the Constitution.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


15 posted on 05/20/2016 9:57:17 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I believe that, from now on, whenever I run into a transgender,pajama boy/girl, effete, butch, liberal bedwetting, safe space seeking idiot, I will just turn and walk away, shaking my head....


16 posted on 05/20/2016 9:59:32 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
The 8th amendment is a dead letter. Otherwise a bakery in Oregon could not be fined $135,000 for refusing to decorate a cake in a manner contrary to their religious beliefs.

I think I have heard the word "ze" before, from Inspector Clouseau.

17 posted on 05/20/2016 10:05:26 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

The generation that was brought up on high-stakes standardized exams is now bringing us “high-stakes etiquette”.

Your pronouns, or your life!


18 posted on 05/20/2016 10:06:24 AM PDT by AZLiberty (A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius; All
 photo ob19Oqv.png

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


19 posted on 05/20/2016 10:06:36 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949
I will just turn and walk away, shaking my head....

THAT will be a finable offense as well, soon enough.

20 posted on 05/20/2016 10:09:30 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson