Posted on 05/28/2016 8:27:06 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Absolutely. I'm of a mind that resistance is not futile, and I point to Ghandi for an example of what I mean by resistance.
-- They are deliberately destroying healthy civilizations to elevate themselves to power ... --
Depends on what one views as "destroying healthy civilizations." I think, at bottom, these aristocrats are seeking some sort of comfortable balance where they get to rule, and the people have enough freedom or illusion of freedom that they do not become restive.
Elections are a tool to keep people from becoming restive. Elections do not displace anybody into or out of the aristocracy, merely re-assign them to different roles, the "revolving door" thing-a-ma-bob.
You'll have to buy a copy. I bought one maybe 15 years ago, and at the time it was out of print. It's a good read, not difficult.
The biggest takeaway for me was that a society that doesn't believe it is superior, is doomed to extinction.
LOL. Sort of my view as well. Some things are bigger than any of us - a world-wide spiritual battle is afoot, I am sure. I am shocked at many of the changes I've seen in my 40 or so years of paying attention. If it had occurred over a period of say, a year, there would have been open revolution.
Is this the part that has you spooked? They sure can’t risk a preemptive leak.
“The latest proposals for the militarisation are, predictably, shrouded in secrecy.
Federica Mogherini, the head of EU foreign policy, has delayed publicly releasing the plans for new defence structures until after the UK has completed its referendum – so as not to spook the British electorate.
Until then the Global Strategy on Foreign and Security policy can only be viewed by a tiny cabal of diplomats required to make only handwritten notes and to leave their electronic devices outside of a sealed room.
It puzzled me how in 1977 some judges in California forced bussing on our school children and led to the mass exodus of millions of people, families, into suburbs safe from the Los Angeles Unified School Board.
It again puzzled me how one judge overturned our Proposition 187 that denied benefits to the illegal aliens that moved into our abandoned city.
I couldn’t figure out why nobody with authority in city, state or federal government could stop this sanctuary city and how could it survive from administration through administration including our present Republican congress and Senate.
When you think about it, most of the laws we fought for were attacked by the DOJ and overturned by courts, marriage is between one man and one woman, voter ID laws, immigration laws, laws against illegal aliens soliciting work at Home Depot.
Yet when a mayor or governor invites illegals and gives them drivers licenses, jobs, welfare and housing, and subsidized higher ed, nobody can do anything about it.
As the jobs changed to the service industry with low skilled illegal aliens, our Environmental Protection Agency decided that manufacturing caused pollution, so they closed manufacturing and energy down.
Then we went from trying to ease the traffic on our streets to making higher density housing and taking lanes out of our streets for bikes and busses.
I found the answer here
http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/drivingandbuiltenvironment20090901.pdf
Or here http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12747&page=R9
It’s titled Driving and the Built Environment, 2008
They are saying that Hispanics are a growing population and love living in clusters in the inner cities, taking public transportation, walking and riding bikes. That is why they are spending money building all these high density high rise apartments, building the High Speed Rail, light rail, building walkways and bicycle paths.
Page 82
Uses and development are regulated to create a more intense builtup environment, oriented to pedestrians, and ensuring a density and intensity that is transit supportive.” Actions include prohibition of parking garages within a specified distance of a station, a 50 percent reduction in the minimum number of parking spaces required within 500 feet of a light rail alignment, and required streetscape landscaping to a very high level.
Page 86
The foreign-born share of the population is projected to continue to grow to between 13 and 16 percent of the U.S. population by 2030, and to as much as 20 percent of the population by 2050. Immigrant populations, particularly Hispanics, the dominant group, have different housing preferences and travel patterns from those of native-born populations. Recent immigrants tend to live in multifamily housing, Hispanics locate disproportionately in central cities, and all immigrant groups are heavy users of public transportation where it is available. As they become assimilated, however, immigrant groups tend to converge toward the population mean in their housing and transportation preferences.
Page 88
land use policies aimed at effecting sweeping changes in metropolitan area development patterns are likely to be slowed by political resistance from existing homeowners and local governments that reflect their interests, a lack of metropolitan and state government initiatives that could provide incentives on a large enough scale to counter local resistance
Page 115
Housing Choices and Costs
A potential cost of more compact development is the investment in transit, particularly rail transit, necessary to support high-density development. These costs could, at least in part, offset some of the savings from expanding highway infrastructure. The studies cited earlier note some of the other costs of more compact development. One of the first mentioned is the preference of many Americans for single-family homes and lower density suburban settings that are often associated with related benefits, such as greater privacy, less noise, more access to open space and recreation, and in some cases, less congestion and pollution than more densely developed urban settings. Restricting the amount of single-family housing through zoning or other measures that increase compact development could raise the cost of that housing, contributing to housing affordability problems. These affordability problems may be mitigated, however, as the Baby Boomers withdraw from their suburban single-family homes, increasing the supply of such housing. As noted in Chapter 4, moreover, it is unclear that more compact development would greatly restrict housing choices or increase single-family housing prices because exclusionary zoning may have forced a greater mix of single-family housing units than consumers wanted in the past. Moreover, building more compact, mixed-use developments does not necessarily mean building only multifamily housing. Reducing the lot size of single-family housing should also result in VMT reductions. Finally, housing preferences may change with the aging of the population and the withdrawal of the Baby Boomers from their suburban homes; the coming of age of succeeding (albeit smaller) generations of young single-person households who may prefer urban living; and the socioeconomic circumstances and cultural preferences of growing immigrant populations, who often favor high-density locations.
Page 137 (The new federal zoning laws by HUD)
In addition to the scope outlined above and with the agreement of the sponsor, the study will also assess the potential reduction in GHG/CO2 emissions from more dense development patterns. The study will describe development patterns in the context of past and recent population and employment trends that affect residential and business location and travel in a region. In addition, it will consider future demographic changes and trends in immigration that may provide opportunities for development patterns that reduce VMT or for the use of alternative transport modes, as well as the political and institutional challenges (e.g., zoning) that likely would need to be addressed to take advantage of these opportunities. Finally, the study will offer estimates of the potential VMT reductions, energy savings, and GHG/CO2 emissions reductions from various development scenarios and the likely time period over which they might occur.
This was executed by Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood
U.S. Department of Transportation
Transportation for a New Generation
Strategic Plan Fiscal years 2012-2016
http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/990_355_DOT_StrategicPlan_508lowres.pdf
Page 40
“STRATEGIES TO EXPAND OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESSES IN THE TRANSPORTATION SECTOR, ESPECIALLY SMALL, WOMEN-OWNED, AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESSES”
And then here in California they executed there plan with the same discrimination against white male owned businesses.
I think Trump understands this, but I don’t think Cruz does.
It’s outrageous with the concept and secrecy.
Yours is a refreshing post that sheds another angle on the topic. Trump is a happy warrior and fully understands the challenge.
Because he is both brilliant and very wealthy he must personally know some of these aristocratic characters that fly off to Davos or Aspen each year to map their NWO plans.
Trump knows many of the players. These people do have godlike delusions. They are generally people who are intellectually very bright, yet have become atheists. They sense their brilliant superiority over most others. And this is where the narcissism, arrogance and entitlement generally leads them in the wrong direction.
Someone I know was recently talking about this but she had heard it from someone else and so she had it in abbreviated and incomprehensible form. Now I know where it came from. Obvious now, though filtered through two people.
I knew the New World Order plans but couldn’t quite fit the migration chaos neatly into the picture.
Thanks for posting this. It puts the whole ugly jigsaw puzzle together. Now it all starts to make horrific sense.
You point to Ghandi, I’ll point to William Wallace.
You do your thing, I’ll lay my life down for freedom.
The initial low birth rate justification has now been replaced with Merkel’s ‘All Refugees Welcome’ declaration, thereby speeding up the process.”
In all honesty, I edited about 200 words out of a longer post found on Conservative Treehouse. ‘Carol of Australia’ is a their new poster and they uploaded her 4 part thesis today. I’m guessing she was prompted to write the summation after she heard Trump repeatedly saying “We’ll put America First.”
I’ve read a bit on the Kalergi plan, but did not realize he fathered the EU or that awards in his honor have been given to Merkel and Bergoglio-Pope and the Belgium PM -All three are undermining and destroying the culture of their people. Most especially Bergoglio, since he is obligated by God to resist NWO as a Christian.
Funny that 3 1/2 years later, we notice that Pope Benedict is still quite healthy and recognize that his policies conflicted with the Kalergi goals. But at least, he was not ‘permanently terminated’ to advance the Kalergi agenda. Pope Francis is spearheading the European Christians demise.
Thank you for this post. I’ve heard of the Kalergi plan but didn’t know much about it. This explains the actions of Merkel, Cameron, Pope Francis & other elites perfectly.
Everyone, and I mean everyone, needs to know about this. Of course, liberals will dismiss it as paranoia.
What the heck wi going on with all the anti Free Masonry activity of late?
#America1st
And a new tag is born~!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.