Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton IT aide to plead Fifth in email case
The Hill ^ | June 1, 2016 | Julian Hattem

Posted on 06/01/2016 4:19:12 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: justlurking

**** “Stomping your feet and shouting doesn’t change it” ****

No but it does knock the sand off my boots! And I Read and Listen Slowly as a matter of everyday life, I appreciate life’s nuances, flavors and smells.

Odors can tell you a lot about people ... justlurking is one smelly little steaming pile of: (pick one)
Roses
Berries
Pig Offal
Democrat (please don’t pick this one)

passed through the digestive track of a:
Bear
Deer
Honey Bee
Muslim (please don’t pick this one)

You can Identify as anything you want, but you will be known by what you are.

Have a SUPER DAY!


61 posted on 06/01/2016 8:47:28 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

When this broke and before I stopped listening to Limbaugh, he had a guy call in that claimed he was retired military.
Apparently had all the clearances, etc. He advised that certain information, i.e. classified material, couldn’t be sent via the ‘normal internet’, like the one she had set up. He said that anything classified would have to transposed in some way from one system to the other.

There are two kinds of ‘nets’ that the military and government set up just for that purpose. The systems talk to each other and if one doesn’t have the correct security, the emails cannot be sent.

I worked in Baghdad, doing security for the State Dept. They have a SCIF in every embassy. You’re not getting in there without a TS clearance and you better have a damn good reason for being there. It’s a way that they upper level folks, Ambassadors/SES, can communicate high level stuff to another SCIF, somewhere else in the world.

If what that guy said, and I have heard others say it, is true, then this appears to be something that is being lost in all of this. How the hell was she even able to communicate with other government officials when her server/system didn’t have the proper security protocols set up in the first place.

And with all of this, she’ll still walk away ScotFree.


62 posted on 06/01/2016 9:31:09 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

That is what I was getting at, too.

Maybe the word should be 'access' rather than 'connection'. How did she access the State Department systems (apparently the non-classified and classified are 2 different systems), and how did they access her server?

They (newsies/politicians/commentators) are trying to explain all of this in simple terms. However, it seems to need an extensively complicated set-up for 'access'.

I posted in numerous similar threads over the years that these were not simple browser emails most of us use. Somehow, classified info made it from HER server to the State Department and from the State Department to HER server. We know that because of Gawker and similar hackers.

That raises another question: If she didn't even know how to use a desktop pc, why would she even have a cursory knowledge about what kind of system would be needed at home? Per her own statement a week or so ago, she was more concerned about external 'access' to HER private emails than she was to the classified info in official government emails. What was so important in her PRIVATE emails? It surely wasn't just the recipe for Chelsea's wedding cake.
63 posted on 06/01/2016 9:55:40 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

nadvertently, the email scandal is about the Right to Privacy, whether by an individual or his representatives in government. In America, the government is governed by its people. From a privacy point of view, is Hellary counting herself as a private citizen as well as a servant of ours? Whatever the case, William Safire summed up Hellary best, “congenital liar”. Don’t bother parsing her sentences, the truth is an alien to her.


64 posted on 06/01/2016 10:05:56 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

**** “And with all of this, she’ll still walk away ScotFree” ****

Nope

This time it isn’t the elites, this time it is “We the People” and there have been many (not just Bengazi) killed and or maimed or simply compromised.

FBI has to work with a bunch of different folks and this time it is “If you can’t do your job ... we will do it for you” and that is from many different agencies.

FBI Will do their Job... or it will get done for them. It can be In Public or Behind Closed Doors... much of what we are going to learn and what Hillary already knows has already happened, the Clinton’s and Obama are simply setting a stage for the big reveal and it is coming soon.
I said it 6/02/2016 at 30 minutes into this new glorious day.


65 posted on 06/01/2016 10:29:06 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Innocent people don’t claim 5th Amendment protection.


66 posted on 06/01/2016 10:36:49 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
according to Hillary, everything she did was allowed under the rules, and besides, other Secretaries of State have done the same thing

If so, then Hillary should name names ... which SoS's have "done the same thing" ??? Rice, Powell, Albright, Christopher, Engleburger, Baker, Shultz, Haig ... et al ???

Please name some names, Hillary, please let us know who did what so that they can be dragged down into the muck just like your corrupt little self is being dragged currently .... let us know, Hillary ....

~ MM ~

67 posted on 06/01/2016 11:01:03 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

She rarely puts herself in a position to be asked.


68 posted on 06/02/2016 3:52:18 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Right, and perhaps why he’s taking the fifth in this case.


69 posted on 06/02/2016 4:06:34 AM PDT by Beach333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
“Should anything happen to him, [Pagliano] probably has a hidden document, diary, who knows what else, already in the proper place...”

Don't forget that Pagliano already has sung like a canary to the FBI. Because he got immunity to testify to them, he is talking and he's telling the truth. (His attorney would make sure he understood that you do not accept a deal for immunity and then lie. Plus, if he had lied to the FBI to cover for HRC, he simply would have lied in the civil suit, rather than have pleaded the 5th.)

70 posted on 06/02/2016 6:41:42 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

“[Pagliano’s] safe now. He was in incredible danger, but the Clinton Syndicate missed their opportunity. Now that he has been granted immunity, he has certainly already spilled all the beans in videotaped depositions so it’s too late, and would look too suspicious.”

Exactamundo, and well put. I believe that Pagliano’s FBI testimony is the reason the Dems are readying a plan to supplant HRC with Biden or whomever. Pagliano knows all about why HRC wanted that server, what was on it, who paid him, etc. That testimony will have great weight in the FBI report and itself will be leaked eventually if HRC is not indicted. The Clintons aren’t going to have Pagliano rubbed out because it’s too late now. Hell, at this point, if Pagliano were to have a bus run over him, even the Clintons’ fans would think they had ordered it!


71 posted on 06/02/2016 6:47:33 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: qaz123
“And with all of this, [HRC’ll] still walk away ScotFree.”

Not this time. Will HRC be hanged for treason? No. But I believe she will never be President on account of this, or that she'll make it to the White House and end up being led out of the Oval Office in handcuffs.

72 posted on 06/02/2016 6:52:03 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: utahagen
The person in danger at this moment (there will be more) is Cheryl Mills.

She made a complete ass of herself in her JW deposition, with dozens of "I don't recall" answers and objections from her lawyers.

The Clinton Syndicate is going to realize she is the next one the gov is going to try to flip, and she is also too stupid to realize the danger she is in, so she is tops on my "Not Yet Clinton-ed Dead Pool."

73 posted on 06/02/2016 7:20:14 AM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

“The person in danger at this moment (there will be more) is Cheryl Mills.”

I have to believe that Cheryl Mills is safe. Since her lawyer is being paid for (indirectly, at least) by an HRC champion, they’ll simply make sure she bobs and weaves, or lies and goes to prison, to protect HRC. There won’t be any need to rub her out.


74 posted on 06/02/2016 7:49:25 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

once he talked and cooperated with Federal Investigators he waived the 5th. He was granted immunity .


75 posted on 06/02/2016 11:26:38 AM PDT by WENDLE (RICO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utahagen
"I have to believe that Cheryl Mills is safe. Since her lawyer is being paid for (indirectly, at least) by an HRC champion..."

That Clinton lawyer (that Mills may have been "coerced" to approve) gets inside info on what is happening in real time, and may be the one to tell the Clinton Syndicate: "I can no longer vouch for her loyalty."

76 posted on 06/02/2016 12:36:42 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
You are surely right that the inside lawyer is really working for HRC, but I do not envision Cheryl Mills ever having the will or the guts to go against HRC. Mills would rather go to prison, as Harry Thompson and Webb Hubbell did.
77 posted on 06/02/2016 1:02:19 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: utahagen
"..but I do not envision Cheryl Mills ever having the will or the guts to go against HRC. Mills would rather go to prison,.."

Jim McDougal willingly went to prison for the Clinton Syndicate, and may have had no intention of ratting them out, but Hillary decided he couldn't be trusted, and "Poof!" he dies in prison under the mysterious circumstance of his heart medication being denied.

78 posted on 06/02/2016 1:11:34 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
Forgot about Jim McDougal’s mysterious death!
79 posted on 06/02/2016 1:15:17 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Doesn’t pleading the 5th Amendment = Guilty as hell?

NO.

Dont talk to the Police

80 posted on 06/02/2016 1:17:47 PM PDT by NorthMountain (A plague o' both your houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson