Posted on 06/01/2016 4:37:43 PM PDT by Trumpinator
...How do you spell mistrial...
I understand the sentiment, but there is no mistrial because no trial is happening. But, there could be a motion for a new Judge based on bias. However, the Judge would have to hear and approve the Motion to recuse himself, and he’s not going to do that. That woukd delay the proceeding till after the election. See the problem?
does this mean mistrial?
Do understand this judge is well known and is also associated with the raciest organization, La Raza?
You also understand Trumps position on these reckless violent country killing lawless borders, right?
Check out post 31. Also, up on DRUDGE now. 31 links you right to it. LA Raza judge.
Dude? Still using 60s lingo?
There is light years difference between what I said about disrespect and actions, and what you called “attitude”.
Learn it.
You bet. Be very aware of any screw worms out here attempting to support this judges actions.
Got that right! TRUMP must have telepathy. Did he already know this, when he made a point about “thinking” the judge was “Mexican”? I think maybe he did. Makes him look like a clairvoyant or genius, otherwise.
No problem....
When I need “learning”...
I will come straight to you...since you have the corner on it...
What’s with the attitude? ....someone piss in your cornflakes?
Can’t believe this La Raza story still isn’t up on FR! Gad.
We miss half the news out there, anymore. Drives me nuts, because I can not post on this computer.
From the Dallas Morning News coverage, I figured Trump must have killed a guy.
Dude...no I was not aware of the judges associations....
Someone posted me the links..
I’ve been “learned”
I hope you’re right. Feel a bit better. Thanks
“If he is being mistreated, make it about being treated unfairly, “
He did all that, watch the Trump rally where he spends a substantial amount of time addressing the details of the case and the judge essentially ignoring the law. Trump lays out the facts including the fact that the original complainant wanted out of the case once her own counterfactual written statements were produced.
Instead of issuing a summary judgement and dismissing the case because the complaining party had quit the judge recruited another party. The judge’s behavior is blatantly political and not about the case at all. He’s a corrupt latino activist and Trump is right in calling him out on his lack of ethics.
———He’s a corrupt latino activist and Trump is right in calling him out on his lack of ethics.-——
I was unaware of his La Raza connection until this thread....
As for his lack of ethics, which seems pretty clear, Trump should ask to have him removed...
Thanks for telling me something I already understand....
Like I said....you read way too much into the use of the word-attitude...
Sorry, I used the incorrect word and caused you consternation....
I now understand how important it is for you to right, I’d try not to misuse a word again in the future...
Thanks for the link but Megan Kelly last night said it was so not the truth.
You know she is never wrong and does not have an agenda. /s
Trump doesn’t want that judge to get away. Trump seems to realize that he has an excellent chance to make an example out of this judge in court. Embarrass the crook and maybe wreck his career as a jurist. The judge picked the wrong guy to screw with.
This case was going on before Trump ever decided to run for President. Trump could have settled it long ago if there was any merit. He doesn’t believe that there is any- every student was asked to rate the course after they had completed it- whether they got fair value, did they learn, did they like it. Then original complainant had done so and given the course high marks with no complaints. When this was produced early on she withdrew from the case. Trump has overwhelming contemporary written evidence from the TU students that they were satisfied with the course. He is going to tamp those down the judge’s throat with a big stick.
Words mean things. Learn it.
The judge is a La Raza "activist," open borders sort. Trump is oppossed to that. The claim is that the judge has an axe to grind against Trump, based on Trump's statements about immigration abd building a wall, etc.
At least that is the reason Trump gave.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.