Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

JW v. State Karin Lang Deposition 01363
1 posted on 06/09/2016 1:07:33 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

(I don’t recall )**100


2 posted on 06/09/2016 1:09:07 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Proud heterosexual, married a long time, same woman - is it still ok to use a public restroom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Is Hellry scheduled to be disposed by JW?


3 posted on 06/09/2016 1:11:00 PM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I don’t think the word perjury means anything to these people.


5 posted on 06/09/2016 1:21:37 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

“Lang also said that it would not be reasonable to search all 70,000 State Department email accounts in order to retrieve Clinton’s emails.”

1. Why not - we have computers these days, it would take minutes

2. We have 70,000 state dept employees?!?!?


6 posted on 06/09/2016 2:13:15 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Another one who is a Democrat ahead of being an American.

I guess we should make July 3rd National Democrat Day and that can be their holiday while us Americans will celebrate on the 4th.


8 posted on 06/09/2016 2:30:23 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

> Lang also signed, under the penalty of perjury, State Department answers to Judicial Watch’s written interrogatories about the Clinton email system and FOIA. The State Department acknowledged in its answers that it “has no method of identifying which State Department officials and employees had and/or used an account on clintonemail.com to conduct official government business.”

If that’s under penalty of perjury then it’s perjury, because there’s at least one very easy thing to try, which is scan the email archives at State for occurrences of “clintonemail.com”. This was done a decade ago to check for RNC business being conducted on government systems, no reason it can’t be done now.


12 posted on 06/09/2016 7:06:04 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Wisdom is doing due diligence before forming an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson