Civil Rights Icon Leads Sit-In to Deny Fellow Americans a Constitutional Right

Oh yeah this “legend” of the civil rights era totally lost any credibility for me in March 2010 - when he and the other democrat LIARS - completely fabricated a story about being harassed and spat on by tea party activists during a protest on Capitol Hill.

Remember Nancy Pelosi and her “over-sized gavel” - and human props like this phony John Lewis - tried to goad the tea party protestors - but the protestors didn’t take the bait. But not before Lewis and the others had already sent out completely fake news releases LYING that the protestors spat on them and used the “n-word”. Ooops!

Thanks to Andrew Breitbart - who offered a reward to anyone who could produce video or audio proof that any of these things happened. Of course no one could produce any evidence - because it was a complete SMEAR and LIE.

Elected officials LYING about accusations of racism about people who PAY THEIR SALARIES. DISGUSTING. Sorry Nancy and John - we are not idiots and we remember this incident. This is why you lost the Senate and House after this. We know you are LIARS.

Have you ever seen a bigger bunch of sourpusses?

Fred Sanford had more common sense and leadership ability than a whole Circus Train full of modern day democrats.

If he’s a civil rights icon then shouldn’t he know that previous gun control laws in this country were used to prevent blacks and minorities from owning guns? Why is he trying to send blacks back to the Jim Crow days? Does he not know that after the firebombing in 1956 of Dr. Martin Luther King’s house, he applied for a gun permit. King who was, among other things, a Christian minister, was found unsuitable by the Alabama authorities. Hmmmmmmmm.....now what does that sound like? Oh yeah, it sounds like he was put on a ‘no fly’ list.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.