Skip to comments.Rep. Chu: Tax-Funded Abortions ‘Will Actually Save This Country Money’
Posted on 07/27/2016 11:36:25 PM PDT by Olog-hai
Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) praised the Democratic Party platforms new language Tuesday that calls for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal funds for abortion, saying doing so will save money. [ ]
Chu supported the EACH Woman Act last summer, which would have lifted the Hyde Amendments restrictions on federal funding for abortion.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
Democrats are the spawn of Satan.
I’m sure killing all the inmates would also save us money, similarly, killing old people would also save us money, as would welfare recipients.
Judy Chu is a gun grabber, too.
The deranged perspective of a cunning stunt.
She would have been right at home in Maoist China! /s
This country would be so much better off w/o KA and MA.
Do “Free Abortion” signs line the Mexican trail to the American border the same way “Burma Shave” signs use to line our rural highways?
Are they enacting the “one child” policy like China did?
Jeez, and I always thought human life was more valuable than money!
Is this news?
I thought this was the whole credo of Margaret Ssnger?
It’s ironic in the extreme how intent the Democratic Party is on having Black women’s babies aborted with their permission. A huge, huge irony. A huge industry. Black lives matter? But the promise of a Black life doesn’t matter a whit to the Democrats. A huge industry. Margaret Sanger was the bigot who made people think abortion was a great thing. Her goal and hope was to get rid of Blacks. Finding a way to make them stop having babies was her plan.
rather than having all kinds of unwanted pregnancies, there will be able to be the ability for women to have greater.... income.... Thats the importance of repealing the Hyde Amendment.
in other words, greater income equals more taxes for the political class, humanity be damned
How about....instead of funding abortions with federal dollars, those dollars are used to enroll every pregnant woman who needs it into a job training program so that by the time she’s a new mother, she has skills to bootstrap herself up.
I think she’s missing an important point here, she needs to take the time to explain how it will save money. The price is still the same. It is just alleviating the cost to the consumer and the public picks up the tab. It isn’t saving any money, it is misdirecting the check. And I want no part of someone else’s ignorance of what they have done. Because it now creates a swinging door policy for birth control that can be used in lieu of abstinence. It’s open season......and that slope can’t get any more slippery.
Chu should lead by example. Do a late term abortion on herself! What a piece of crap! They slaughter the unborn babies but defend thugs and crooks and appose the death penalty!
If you kill all the inmates and welfare recipients then there’s no one left to vote for democrats except the dead.
HEH! I saw what you did there!
Are they enacting the one child policy like China did?
On the other hand, we are constantly told that the prolific breeders from Mexico, Central America and the Muslim countries are necessary to inject the energy of new young people into the economy.
So if we need more young workers, even though mayhap rather poor, should we not stop slaughtering our own young?
In Dem world, #Deadvotesmatter
If they could find a way to register a fetus as a Dem prior to the abortion, they would have so many more dead votes.
I even disgusted myself with this post, but dems are evil,
and evil is disgusting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.