Skip to comments.Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia’
Posted on 08/02/2016 7:08:34 PM PDT by maggief
Notwithstanding his war-hero sons genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over man-made Western law including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump.
In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called Human Rights In Islam in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.
Khan speaks admiringly of Brohis interpretation of human rights, even though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic laws and even the right of men to beat wives who act unseemly.
As Pakistani minister of law and religious affairs, Brohi helped create hundreds of jihadi incubators called madrassas and restored Sharia punishments, such as amputations for theft and demands that rape victims produce four male witnesses or face adultery charges. He also made insulting the Muslim prophet Muhammad a crime punishable by death. To speed the Islamization of Pakistan, he and Zia issued a law that required judges to consult mullahs on every judicial decision for Sharia compliance.
Khan, who says he immigrated to the U.S. in 1980 to escape Pakistans military rule, nonetheless spoke admiringly of Brohi in his review of his speech. He praised his remarks even though Brohi advocated for the enforcement of the medieval Sharia punishments, known as hudood (singular hadd), that were later adopted and carried out with brutal efficiency by the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Khizr M. Khan can get his sorry butt out of america and go to H***!
Then that asshat can go mohammed himself.
This anti-American terrorist-supporter is a RAT hero. What does that tell you?
His late son was a true American on the battlefield.
Ashcan Khan is an insurrectionist.
No coincidence that he was a featured speaker at hillary’s convention - she believes the same thing.
I still can’t believe that people are upset over this story. My Facebook is overrun with crap about this story from VERY good people who are great military people. It is disgusting. I have told many here that just because you are in the military doesn’t make you perfect. I am so mad this week that I have decided to not go on Facebook for the week.
People aren't looking at things as they happen before their very eyes and drawing any conclusions, or else...
Burn!! I guess there goes their invite to Hill’s Whitehouse Ramadan Iftar supper.
Soldier Khan is an American Hero. Father Khan is not.
HONOR THE SON YES.
ALL THE REST GET BOOTED OUT.
I think you’re gonna start seeing the Dems and the MSM back away from this guy before he totally wrecks their narrative.
Isn’t it convenient that OBAMA issued an executive order exempting naturalized citizens from defending America?
Brings up an interesting dynamic. Kid rebels against sharia loving father, joins American army.
anti-American terrorist supporter and Democrats?
they both have so much in common.
Yet idiotic Republicans keep on praising this guy..makes me sick to my stomach that our side would support this Sharia loving Jihadist
Not really, media will NEVER EVER report it therefore it doesnt exist
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.