Posted on 08/17/2016 9:05:18 AM PDT by rktman
Despite her famous name, nearly unlimited funding and over-the-top biased media support, Hillary Clinton could be one of the most flawed, unappealing and weakest candidates in modern political times. Other than being a Democratic female at a time when the country is supposedly and impatiently “ready for a woman president,” there is astonishingly little to recommend her as a candidate. No significant accomplishments as either Secretary of State or NY senator, with markedly worse conditions and relationships in every area in which she was involved during her S of S tenure and nary a meaningful “Clinton” bill to her name after eight very visible, high-profile years in the Senate.
Instead, she’s shown herself to be an incredibly cold and ineffective retail campaigner, shrill, forced, disingenuous, unapproachable, entitled. She is the polar opposite of a “likeable” candidate. She completely flunks the “Would you like to have her over to your house for dinner” test. Her husband’s most ardent detractors would admit that Bill has a certain agreeable “loveable rogue” demeanor to his personality. Yet even Hillary’s most fervent supporters are reduced to making weak excuses like, “She’s really a bit nicer in private
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The T-Rex isn't as nasty after it's been fed.
Ask the SS guys/gals, who served when Bubba was the Chief Predator, how nice this beast was to them in private.
(Clinton estimated she hadn’t changed a diaper in roughly 4.5 years).
Euwwwwwww!
Well, there was that little incident in Bengahzi where she got 4 Americans killed through her incompetence and disinterest in their plight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.