And Hillarys State Department lost $6 billion dollars.
- Nina Burleigh referring to President Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal 1998
I’m sure it was just Yoga stuff..........
OK, I’m convinced. I won’t vote for Clinton OR Bush either. I’ll have to vote for Trump then.
6 years = 2,190 days (ignoring leap years)
22,000,000 divided by 2,190 days = 10,045 emails. Every single day.
Is this author completely certain about the claim?
Trump has total separation from Bush. He is able to say, See how crooked Washington is. I’m not a Washington insider.
Yeah, emails like
“Dear Mr. President,
Could you send an autographed picture to my brother? He has been sick.
Thanks.”
The Lefties’ last resort - deflect attention by attacking someone else, preferably with unproven and unprovable allegations.
Nina Burleigh... isn’t she the one who was willing to service Bubba because of everything he’d done for women.
Wonder how much a pay-per-view Bumfight of some female bum cleaning Ninas clock would haul in?
I think that Nina Burleigh would do a threesome with the Clintons if she could.
The whole article cleverly sidesteps the main issue of CLASSIFIED information being sent by unsecured email.
It all started when scrutiny of shady dealings such as Benghazi brought attention to Hillary’s noncompliance on classified information.
And in the process of looking into whether she shared classified information via unsecured email, it became clear that she destroyed evidence, obstructed justice, and committed perjury.
But it all backfired when her own choice of convenience over national security led to hackers stealing her emails, some of which were publicly released. Additionally, emails the FBI has have been publicly released. And consequently it has come to light that she has been selling access and financial awards using her office at State and her family’s non-profit foundation.
Was there ever any reason to believe Bush used a private server to send classified information? I don’t think so. Bush had every right to use executive privilege when he did. Beyond that the Democrats were on a witch hunt. While anything is possible, including that the emails contained proof of Bush corruption, there has to be some evidence to start such a fishing expedition other than just not liking someone’s political views.
And the accusation about firing lawyers because of their politics is so typical of the left. They think it is their divine right to control all media, all educational institutions, all legislative bodies, all judicial bodies, and all executive and law enforcement bodies. They have been playing the long game, strategically infiltrating every area of society incrementally. And they scream bloody murder when conservatives get the slightest bit of representation in our government.
If Bush had done this, Nina, you and your ilk would have reported it at the time. And you didn’t. Why?
Did the loss occur before or after the subpoena was issued?