Posted on 10/11/2016 12:48:26 PM PDT by Kaslin
Exactly. Imagine:
Cruz - Neanderthal Bible thumper.
Rubio - closet gay (not a problem for Dems but we all know about the double standard).
Christie - fat slob who killed people during Bridgegate.
Carson - Uncle Tom who knows nothing about politics.
The Democrat/media/government complex would destroy, or attempt to destroy Jesus himself.
I thought the biggest blunder so far was releasing the P***y tape now instead of on Election Eve.
I recently attended a week-long quilting retreat. 100 women, and all senior citizens. I heard worse there than what Trump said.
If not for the media putting this as prime news, it would be a non-story. They just need to deflect anything that might come up about Hillary. Shameful.
Oh, and BTW, the biggest blunder in history was giving women the vote.
And I’m one! ;-)
This isn’t like any other election.
Democrats.....
The damned CLINTONS are BOTH a joke when it comes to abuse
of women. “Horndog and Hillie” says it all.
Walking over rough gravel, barefoot if I have to, in order
to vote TRUMP! As for the turncoat GOPe; THEY HAVE BEEN
WEIGHED IN THE BALANCES AND FOUND WANTING!!
HAS-LAM in Tennessee could have just as easily KEPT HIS
PIEHOLE SHUT!!! Fang & I will NEVER VOTE FOR HAS-LAM the
HAS-BEEN AGAIN!!! NEVER!!!!!
Summary.....I suspect that if it's done right between now and the election, he'll get more of those votes than he's polling. Perhaps the best person to get out there on the stump is Mrs. Pence.
Where’s that pic of Hussein as da Bebbel in a hoodie?
“the biggest blunder in history was giving women the vote.”
Agree. And I’m one, too.
and I agree as well, and I’m one, too!
“:^)
Unless they have worse on deck.
I believe the author is absolutely wrong on two counts in this article:
1. Despite his strong negative ratings among women as far back as last spring, I remember that polls were consistently showing Trump performing better than any other Republican contenders against Hillary Clinton (and Bernie Sanders polling better than Clinton against Trump, for that matter). I mean, does the author really think Carly Fiorina would even be attracting the support of 30% of the voters if she had been the GOP nominee?
2. The track record of a male Republican candidate, and information that comes out about that candidate's past, have become increasingly irrelevant in an election because the Democratic campaigns will fabricate "woman" issues against any GOP contender anyway. This is where an in-your-face candidate like Donald Trump may have a better chance of winning than a simpering p#ssy like Mitt Romney.
The author's own numbers seem to bear this out, or at least point to a flaw in his argument. Mitt Romney did slightly better among female voters in 2012 than George W. Bush did in 2000. Bush won, and Romney lost.
More than anything else, this article tells me that Republican candidates simply have to get more men to vote in these elections. My question for the author is: Which Republican candidate in 2016 was most likely to attract more men?
“The target audience is the women’s vote, in particular suburban white women”
In other news, _50_Shades_of_Gray_ sold 80,000,000 books and $600,000,000 in theater tickets (not including video sales/rental). The story features a billionaire crudely objectifying women.
Women talk amongst themselves just as badly..................
You know that’s a guy, right?..................
I will take crude and lewd over corrupt and lawless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.