Posted on 10/23/2016 6:14:38 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
From:cheryl.mills@gmail.com
To: kristinakschake@gmail.com
Date: 2015-03-09 11:38
Subject: Re: Draft Statement for HRC for Tues (comment)
Kristing
Not sure who is the keeper of the document but find an additional comment attached.
I didn't cir to everyone to not clutter inboxes (I am having a hard time with mine)!
thanks
cdm
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Mandy Grunwald wrote:
> Joel, Jim and I have drafted the following for HRC to say tomorrow:
>
> thx
>
> Mandy
>
> Before we get started, I'd like to take a minute to talk about the
> topic...of emails.
>
> I think there has been some confusion out there about my emails as
> Secretary of State, so I want to talk about it directly.
>
> When I was in the Senate, I used a Blackberry for both work and personal
> emails. When I got to work as Secretary, I wanted to do the same
> thing. So I opted to use my personal email account - which was permitted
> by the department - because I thought it would be easier to carry just one
> device for my work and for my personal emails, instead of two.
>
> A lot of you know, I'm not exactly a technological whiz.
>
> Looking back, it would have been better if I had simply used a second
> email account and carried a second phone, but at the time, this certainly
> didn't seem like an issue.
>
> I sent my work emails to government employees at their government > addresses, which meant they were immediately preserved on the system at the
> State Department.
>
> After I left office, when the Department asked for all emails from
> former secretaries of state sent from their personal accounts, I
> responded right away and we have turned over all of my work related
> emails, which total roughly 55,000 printed pages.
>
> I have also asked that the State Department make all of these emails
> public so everyone can see them for themselves.
>
>
> *Mandy Grunwald* > *Grunwald Communications*
> *202 973-9400 <202%20973-9400>*
>
>
-----Original Message-----
> From: Heather Samuelson v> To: Kristina Schake
> Cc: john.podesta ; Robby Mook < <
> robbymook2015@gmail.com>; Jennifer Palmier I < > jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com>; Huma Abedin ;
> Philippe Reines ; Nick Merrill ;
> Cheryl Mills ; jbenenson ;
> jim.margolis@gmmb.com ; gruncom ;
> john ; Turner, Katherine ; Kendall,
> David
> Sent: Sun, Mar 8, 2015 3:30 pm
> Subject: Revised Q&A and Statement
>
> Revised Q&A and statement are attached, incorporating edits/comments
> from this morning. Thx
>
> *From:* Kristina Schake
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 8, 2015 3:24 PM
> *To:* Heather Samuelson
> *Cc:* john.podesta@gmail.com, Robby Mook , Jennifer
> Palmier I , Huma Abedin
> , Philippe Reines , Nick Merrill
> , Cheryl Mills ,
> jbenenson@bsgco.com, jim.margolis@gmmb.com ,
> gruncom@aol.com, john@algpolling.com, Turner, Katherine , Kendall,
> David
>
> Attached is Jen's press and surrogate plan.
>
>
>
Note: at the bottom of the email thread, DAVID KENDALL (Hillary's Lawyer) is cc'd. Note that it mentions an attachment of Jen's press and surrogate plan...and who the hell is john@algpolling.com ...?!!
Wow! Attorneys colluding with a client to perjure herself. That is - don’t laugh - a serious violation of attorney “ethical standards.”
There must also be emails out there with staffers arguing over whose turn it is to wipe HRC’s smelly ass (presumably Huma gets a day off here and there). I’m sure they are out there.
She apparently doesn’t have an original thought ever based on these email leaks. Everything is a fraud.
FBI can’t arrest in Hillarys aMeriKa
Hillary at Silicone Valley tech convention. She sap-
happily admitted to having several personal devices
BUT at the infamous UN presser, she put on her dumb act.
READ ON.
EVEN BEFORE HER INFAMOUS UN PRESSER WHERE THE SMIRKNG HILLARY DENIED EVERYTHING---Fox has Hillary on video wherein Hillary tells an earlier tech conference in California: I have, you know, an iPad, a mini iPad, an iPhone and a Blackberry.
" Where are all those electronics, Hillary"?
Did Hillary delete pertinent e-mails while subject to congressional investigation?
THE NYT REPORTED 3/27/15: Clintons review (and erasing?) of her emails did not occur when she was secretary of state ......or even shortly after she left office.
Last October, nearly two years after she left office, the State Department sent her a letter requesting all government records, like emails, she may have possessed. In response, she provided the State Department in December with about 30,000 printed emails that she said were government records. She has said that an additional 30,000 emails were personal.
It appears Clinton still has copies of the emails she deemed public records. Attached to Mr. Kendalls letter was one sent to him by the State Department this week.
A letter from the under secretary of state for management, Patrick F. Kennedy, said that the department understood that she wanted to keep copies of those documents. Mr. Kennedy said that the agency had consulted with the National Archives, and that allowing her access to the documents is in the public interest as it will promote informed discussion as she responds to congressional and other inquiries.
========================================
ADDENDUM---The State Dept may also be facing charges of misleading a court WRT the court's request for documents...and for tampering w/ evidence.
=======================================
......an article months ago mentioned the first server Hillary used was the one in their Chappaqua house for Slick/s use when he left the White House......against the advice of Slick/s people. At some point Hillary went to a server managed by an outside company. Pagliano probably had some involvement in the migration if not sole responsibility.
Hillary obviously had to keep her pay-to-play Foundation business off government computers. Fortunately whether it was Pagliano or someone else, the file deletion/wipe was less than professional.
Whats going to happen to Sid Blumenthal? Not a govt employee, Sid was employed by the Cilnton Foundation and had side business interests.....but Sid had clasified info almost verbatim (as confirmed by the NSA). The next few months are going to be beyond interesting. Hillary is dead meat. (hat tip meatloaf)
I think it’s a guy named John Anzalone.
“Wow! Attorneys colluding with a client to perjure herself. That is - dont laugh - a serious violation of attorney ethical standards.”
Should find out where this attorney is licensed, and send these emails to the review board there.
It's interesting how she always referred back to Colin Powell and how he used a personal email at times. As we know, Hillary has manipulated Powell's statements. HOWEVER, Condeleezza Rice NEVER used a personal account and Condeleezza immediately preceeded Hillary.
Have to wonder if she asked Condi and didn't get the answer she wanted, so she went to Colin Powell and manipulated his answer when questioned.
Everything she says or does is scripted. It’s no wonder she’s so robotic and freaks when asked a spontaneous question.
Trump needs to forgo his 100 day plan and start firing people on day one. First to go would Brennan. Next, Comey. Next, Lynch. Then every muslim appointee of the Kenyan.
John Analzone?
“Anzalone Liszt Grove Research (ALG) is a public opinion research firm specializing in message development and strategic consulting. For nearly 20 years, we have helped our clients achieve their goals, from clients ranging from President Obama, to EMILYS List, to Volkswagen.”
Fantastic. Clinton campaign brought in a polling / PR firm to craft what to say to provide the best fake-truth money can buy.
That didn’t work out so well with Volkswagen, BTW with their faked-EPA specs followed by their lies about the lies.
I went to the site, and right there, was that “Liberal Smirk”. (!)
“specializing in message development “
In other words,lying.
.
The Clinton’s NEVER say or do ANYTHING until 24-30 hours after the event. This gives them 24 hours to do focus group testing and polling to find their “answer” and write their words.
And to pre-publish their words to their ABCNNBCBS press corpse.
So this guy is the internal polling contact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.