Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Study Proves Water Used In Fracking Is Perfectly Safe
The Daily Caller ^ | 10-24-16 | Andrew Follett

Posted on 10/24/2016 1:35:28 PM PDT by DeweyCA

Water used in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, can be reused to water crops with no adverse effects, according to research published Monday by California government officials.

Officials in the state’s Cawelo Water District (Cawelo) concurred with toxicologists that the recycled water was safe for agricultural use. Researchers found no difference in crops which were irrigated with recycled fracking water and those irrigated from other sources. This confirmed previous analyses that recycled water is safe for crops.

So far, the program has provided 10 billion gallons of safe water to California farmers, despite a major drought in that state.

“Ongoing testing continues to show that there is no difference in crops irrigated with oilfield-produced water filtered and treated by Cawelo and those irrigated by other sources of water,” Dave Quest, California director of the pro-industry group Energy In Depth, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “This is something people concerned with the environment and the safety of our food supply should celebrate, as it is the very definition of a win-win-win: for California’s agriculture industry, for consumers and for the environment. This is especially true during the current severe drought.”

Environmental activists have vehemently opposed experimental irrigation of crops with recycled fracking water. Green groups like Food and Water Watch, Californians Against Fracking and the Center for Biological Diversity have all attempted to stop the research.

“Activists who oppose this program are showing their true colors; they continue to attempt to scare the public about a program that they know scientific analysis consistently shows is safe, which indicates that their agenda is not science or safety,” Quest continued. “That they would oppose a program that provides 10 billion gallons of beneficial water to a critical industry that feeds not only California but the whole country shows how short sighted their anti-energy extremism really is.”

Up to 96 percent of wastewater from fracking is from naturally occurring salts and brines, not artificial fracking fluids, a new study published by Duke University concluded.

Duke researchers found that between 92 and 96 percent of wastewater coming out of fracking wells was comprised of naturally occurring brines and salts, which were extracted along with the gas and oil. Only about 4 to 8 percent of the wastewater included man-made chemicals.

Numerous other scientific studies from regulatory bodies, academics, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and even the EPA have determined that fracking doesn’t contaminate drinking water.

“From our assessment, we conclude there are above and below ground mechanisms by which hydraulic fracturing activities have the potential to impact drinking water resources. We did not find evidence that these mechanisms have led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources in the United States,” according to a five-year study on the impacts of fracking published by the EPA in June 2015.

Environmentalists responded to these studies, saying, “millions of Americans know that fracking contaminates groundwater and for the EPA to report any differently only proves that the greatest contamination from the industry comes from its influence and ownership of our government.”

Fracking earthquake myths from environmentalists frequently confuse fracking with wastewater disposal. These myths are so widespread that the USGS actually maintains a “Myths and Misconceptions” section of its website to debunk them. Environmental groups frequently blame fracking for just about everything, including droughts, drinking water contamination, flaming tap-water, poverty, income inequality, and even low sperm counts.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/24/top-university-stole-millions-from-taxpayers-by-faking-global-warming-research/#ixzz4O2LUkiGj


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: environment; fracking
Another example of how the anti-fracking environmentalists are wrong. It is amazing to me how these people remain stuck on stupid. They are totally blind and totally unwilling to contemplate the other perspective.
1 posted on 10/24/2016 1:35:28 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
The EPA and the FDA lose again.
2 posted on 10/24/2016 1:38:30 PM PDT by SandRat ( (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Yes, but fracking causes EARTHQUAKES and TIDAL WAVES. You are behind the curve, Dewey.


3 posted on 10/24/2016 1:39:09 PM PDT by alstewartfan (I sit here by the banks of the Rhine Dipping my feet in the cold stream of time. 1934 by Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

Problem solved. The left will accept the results.


4 posted on 10/24/2016 1:41:02 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

I know fracking is perfectly safe. Know how? The left hates it.


5 posted on 10/24/2016 1:42:50 PM PDT by ColdOne ((poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Because you'd be in jail! She is a nasty woman! Well she is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Its mostly sand and a fluid to keep the sand grains in suspension.


6 posted on 10/24/2016 1:43:59 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Wrong! Dihydrogen Monoxide is a killer. It should be banned.


7 posted on 10/24/2016 1:44:12 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The process recently named “fracking” has been employed in oil exploration and collection since 1949 I read recently...


8 posted on 10/24/2016 1:45:00 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Oops...Missed it by a year...

Hydraulic fracturing began as an experiment in 1947, and the first commercially successful application followed in 1950


9 posted on 10/24/2016 1:46:42 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing


10 posted on 10/24/2016 1:48:48 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Honestly it depends on whats in the ground where the fraciing is occurring.

You cannot ignore the cases where the water people are drinking after fracking in the area, makes it undrinkable and puts enough combustible gasses as the result of fracking, that they can ignite it.

In these cases again, not the fracking fluid, but what underground trapped gas pockets the fracking releases into well supplies.


11 posted on 10/24/2016 2:13:08 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

” combustible gasses as the result of fracking, “

They already had gas in their water. Naturally occurring.

Fracking dangers are hoaxes.


12 posted on 10/24/2016 2:22:32 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

That could be true, but probably not at the levels it is afterwards. I think if several families in the same area had flammable water for decades they would have gotten the news crews out there a long time ago.


13 posted on 10/24/2016 2:30:56 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Maybe so, but anyone who represents to the public that a source of water is safe should have to agree that they and their family will drink this water exclusively for a certain period of time.


14 posted on 10/24/2016 2:48:13 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I know fracking is perfectly safe. Know how? The left hates it.

...

Just like they hate DDT and the millions of lives it could have saved.


15 posted on 10/24/2016 2:51:30 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

We Frack for Peace


16 posted on 10/24/2016 2:52:47 PM PDT by Thibodeaux (Exile Barack, Exile the Wookie, Exile Malia, Exile Shasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Environmentalists responded to these studies, saying, “millions of Americans know that fracking contaminates groundwater and for the EPA to report any differently only proves that the greatest contamination from the industry comes from its influence and ownership of our government.”

...

Someone once told Eisenhower that half of all Americans have below average intelligence.


17 posted on 10/24/2016 2:55:00 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

I do give a frack.


18 posted on 10/24/2016 5:33:29 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson