Posted on 11/01/2016 8:28:09 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
EMAILID 41841
John Podesta on On Mon, Mar 2, 2015:
On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later Cherly Mills
think you just got your new nick name :)
Paul Combetta, an employee of Platt River Networks used BleachBit to dump 33K emails between March 25-31 according to press reports.
Shortly after having a phone conversation with Cheryl Mills . Was Podesta talking about deleting the emails here?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841
A short little email from someone called Tina to John Podesta on 2015-04-08
Subject: CHAI i cannot stress enough that if this is not handled appropriately it will blow up
CHAI as we know is the Clinton Health Access Initiative. So what can be the big scandal?
Was she talking about CHAI scheming to keeping the prices of AIDS drugs high in the US? Or is there another huge scandal that is yet uncovered?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41433
Tom Hamburger (...) from the Washington Post February 7, 2016 alerts Podesta to the fact that the Clinton Foundation is under serious investigation . Clinton Foudation corruption?
Sorry to interrupt your Sunday. We have confirmation from interview and other records that the Clinton Foundation received a subpeona from the State IG requesting documents and document preservation. Would you have a moment to chat about this. We want to be careful with this and get it right.
Hamburger put out this article 4 days later. http://archive.is/q67UX
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41855
Chelsea Clinton used the fake name Anna James in this email. She previously used another alias "Diane Reynolds" . The content also seems interesting seems something very shady that they wanted to keep very secret, very secure: 2011-11-20
John, Bruce and Terry - as we've emailed or discussed or you've discussed with my father, we will be having a private and confidential oral debrief with Victoria Bjorkland and Jennifer Reynoso on Wednesday... it makes the most sense for us to meet in Chappaqua from 12pm-1:30pm, going later if need be and debriefing with Bruce afterwards. Simpson Thatcher will set up a confidential conference call in line to ensure that we have complete privacy and preserve attorney client privilege. They or I will forward those details when we have them. Thanks, Chelsea
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/40622
*PING*
but there is no intent.....
Naahh, no, of course not.
On the first one...that email was the same day that the NYT first exposed the existence of Hillary’s private server. Knowing the impact the NYT has on all things Clinton and Democrat...read that one again:
EMAILID 41841
John Podesta on On Mon, Mar 2, 2015:
“On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later”
Cherly Mills
“think you just got your new nick name :)”
You go, Grey Whiskers!
I’m glad not everyone is watching the obvious right now.
You and Liz and other researchers rock!
This is an old trick. If you're not my wife, priest or lawyer, and I tell you something "secret", you could be compelled to disclose it in a court proceeding later on.
But if you and I talk about secret matters with "our" lawyer, the lawyer can't be compelled to disclose it and neither can you or I.
Hence the trick: whenever we want to talk about secrets, we invite "our" lawyer to listen in by phone, then we can claim that our conversation was all part of a discussion with our lawyer (even if he or she never said anything) and therefore it's protected by attorney client privilege.
I tried looking these people up. Chelsea misspells Borklund.
RICO, and not meaning a guy with a Latino name
I’m so familiar with their intentions that I don’t quite ‘get it’.
This reveals ‘intent’?
Any destruction of evidence is proof of intent. Clearly they were discussing that. In my opinion, Bleachbit cinches it. Who wants to go through all that trouble to obliterate an email about Chelsea’s wedding?
Any destruction of evidence is proof of intent. Clearly they were discussing that. In my opinion, Bleachbit cinches it. Who wants to go through all that trouble to obliterate an email about Chelsea’s wedding?
The criminals had/have NOTHING to worry about.
Comey and Lynch have SWORN to destroy the evidence
just like Comey did, when he and his #2 (for his +1)
got the FBI to destroy disc drives
from Congress.
Never again trust the FBI.
Work Highlights
Conducted a governance review for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation
Could be a ringer in the DOJ... FOP (friend of Podesta)
___________________________________
On Monday, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik sent a letter to Congress assuring Democratic leaders that any investigation into newly discovered emails—from the laptop that Huma Abedin shared with Anthony Weiner—would be over quickly and efficiently.
Kadzik is an attorney, and before he worked for the federal government, he represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky affair, when Podesta testified before the Kenneth Starr commission. They clearly stayed close.
Here’s an email from right after the Benghazi hearings, showing Kazdik and Podesta meeting up for dinner at Podesta’s home.
-
And kazdik was Marc rich’s lawyer when comey investigated the brib for pardon...he is very deep in the Clinton swamp, like Cheryl
Mills.
And kazdik was Marc rich’s lawyer when comey investigated the brib for pardon...he is very deep in the Clinton swamp, like Cheryl
Mills.
And kazdik was Marc rich’s lawyer when comey investigated the brib for pardon...he is very deep in the Clinton swamp, like Cheryl
Mills.
Deep deep in the swamp..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.