Posted on 11/01/2016 9:46:20 AM PDT by xzins
We truly need a haiku for this moment
Lynch, McCabe, & Comey before an chance meeting with Clinton.
Checks cashed. Evidence destroyed. Snort.
Sorry for being stupid, but I’m not quite sure what you are saying here.
My point was, based on the wording of Podesta, dump could mean publicly release as in ‘sooner’ rather than later.
And that intent to destroy evidence is already shown by the bleaching fact.
Are you saying its possible that they bleached not knowing it is illegal to do so?
C’mon. If we’ve learned anything from these Podesta emails is that he is one sharp cookie. He knows way, way better than to state in writing that we need to destroy evidence. How many of these emails involve these guys coordinating a conference calls to discuss this stuff, because they know they can’t discuss in writing?
And as for folks who claim “dump” isn’t synonymous with release ... why do they call politicians pushing out bad news on the weekend as “Friday Afternoon Document Dumps”??
Can we put McCain and Romney at that trough, too, or is that hoping for too big a bite. :>)
To Wikileaks, a dump means to put them out for everyone to see.
I think it’s ridiculous to pretend there was no intent.
I totally agree.
Its always been the most skeptical angle of this all for me.
Evil people like Clinton didn’t get as far as she is by documenting her crimes so blatantly.
Or maybe she really is just that naive about technology?
Comey knew about Bleachbit and STILL thought he couldn’t find intent. (Which Giuliani says is unbelievable.)
So, with bleachbit, and destruction of cell phones, and lying multiple times, and the unsecure server itself in existence, we NOW have someone saying to dump all the data on “those emails” that were just mentioned in the news.
You’re correct. Looking at all the evidence in totality, the obstruction of justice, and tampering and destroying, ‘dump’ means hide or wipe away with “Bleachbit” the memory wipe program. Notice all the dancing on the head of a pin to explain otherwise.
The cold sea water
Washes around the rats’ feet
It is time to go
Does anyone know which Wikileak email # this is? It’s always good to check the actual document. There are some out there ready to deceive us because we want to believe we have the smoking gun.
BTW, I think you are far from stupid.
As someone has said, why not just say “release to the public.” After all, they were talking within the inner circle with no expectation of their words becoming public.
To Podesta who wrote this it means destroy the emails.
LOL!
Excellent
5
7
5
I’m with you except for one thing nagging at me: Michelle deleted three years of Twitter today.
What if this stuff PROVES it goes all the way to the top?
The initial "NO INTENT" conclusion for non-indictment from Comey was THE biggest pile of BS ever.
I wonder if Jim-Bob addresses "intent" factor after the 650,000 emails have been examined THIS time?
Q: What is the US's policy on extradition with Switzerland?
This should be HUGE.
But, the lapdog media, rather than report the NEWSmuch less do any investigative reporting of their ownexist only to help her figure a way out of this, should it ever become a problem.
That was my first reaction as well -- but remember, they then went out and lied repeatedly about the status, slow-walked all responses, and ultimately deleted the emails. A fair inference can be drawn from that fact. Of course, that will not stop Clinton, Podesta and the rest of the gang from insisting that they intended "dump" to mean "release," and that incompetent underlings misunderstood. This, however, will not be believed by anyone outside the Obama Department of Justice.
It all depends upon what the meaning of the word “yoga” is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.