Posted on 11/14/2016 10:11:37 PM PST by Kevin in California
The New York Times really embarrassed themselves in this past election. So much so, their earning were down 90% because no one reads their bullshit anymore. Now the New York Times is so desperate to get back readers that they are claiming that they will rededicate the fish wrap newspaper to report honestly on America and the world. Yea, Like im going to believe that BS.
LMAO!
The Old Gray Lady will be one of the first ones to be sucked down the swamp drain.
Too little, too late...
To the NY Slimes: I might have been born at night, but it wasn’t last night.
Bankrupt the dinosaur media, like Obama destroyed coal industry.
Easy, pull away all the phone ad council crap, public service announcements, govt pork advertising. Vanquish them...
Slim or fat chance?
So now they’ve sunk to pathos, self-degradation and farce.
Like a junkie promising to never use again.
How can you re-dedicate yourself to something you never were?
Actually, it’s really kind of quaint that the New York Times believes there are still people out there who trust what they say. That’s such a fond reminiscence for them to provide; it’s kind of touching.
Slim is out of town - Mexico City I think.
I would have a lot easier time believing this if they weren’t still putting out twisted garbage as of Monday morning the 14th.
How many heads are going to roll for malfeasance, and the destruction of public trust?
Zero!
I’d sooner believe Peewee Herman (Paul Rubens) was a macho man.
Tucker Carlson on his new show this evening was reading from today’s edition - Trump destroying the culture of DC - and chortling madly.
the NYT is indeed reprehensible, but the 95% drop in quarterly profits was due to $9 million in restructuring, one time write offs, and buy outs. Revenue was down 18% or so for the quarter, which is pretty horrifying, but that was still $360 million or so.
but if their quarterly profits were down 95% after a quarter of normal operations, they’d close the doors the next day — which would make me nothing but happy, mind you.
but the 95% figure is misleading.
Bwahahahahha.............hahahaha.....................lol.......rofl..............hahaha.....
There is only one way to tell when the New York Times is lying—they are publishing.
When they go out of business permanently the lies end.
Not one moment before....
Good for him. I like Tucker. I wish good things for his show, namely that he’ll be a success and deliver the right information supporting our nation and cause.
Plus, today's issue is encyclopedic in showing just how deranged they are.
We've agreed to take a wait and see approach: honestly, if I see a shift, I'll go along with her. And if it shifts back, I'll get on the phone and cancel.
The reason I wouldn’t use the NYT to wrap my fish in is because it would make my fish smell rotten.
ReBranding...let’s try this thing called “honesty”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.