This is the big takeaway from the election, and the Barbara Starrs (whoever she is) are the last to figure it out.
For those who have desire and drive, there is no longer a need to sit in front of that talking box or wait for the paperboy to drop yesterday’s news in the driveway in order to know what is going on in the world.
And once one discovers the other avenues, the biases of the former sources become crystal clear.
Yes, so long as I get my daily fix of FR and Trump's tweets.
There's great efficiency visiting FR, rather than reading all these adware-infested news sites whose aim is not to inform, but to teach the "manifesto" and steer you to the latest Kardashian pics.
The comradeship, intelligent comments, and wit of vetted conservatives is also precious. (Though I sometimes enjoy seeing an idiot or troll get flamed.)
FR also broadens your horizons. If you only read the WaPo or TownHall, you would never know what deplorables really think. And I'm convinced: hearing the FR "street chatter" trains the ear for become a better writer.
When the New York Times publishes something unbiased, that's truly rare. But to be honest, they do stoop to journalism on occasion :- )