And here's the antidote...
Posted on 12/15/2016 11:57:33 AM PST by grundle
Skip to 9:08 to hear Swedish women defending Muslim rapists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znN3Tm36Vt8
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Hmmmm.... Now I begin to understand where the term “Stockholm Syndrome” comes from.
You can always tell a Swede, but you can’t tell him much.
were these women the ones who were raped? IF not they should keep their ignorant mouths shut- IF so- they should keep their ignorant mouths shut
Insanity!
Swedish women defend Muslim rapists!
They will be without a country of their own.
Soon.
That’s flat-out nuts.
Typically, this is because it had not happen to them. They'll change their tune when they become victims.
Welcome to feminine liberalism
You cannot tell them to not be free, but if you tell them that screwing with a muslim endangers their freedom, you infringe on their “freedom to choose”.
Ergo they embrace the islamists and become brides for ISIS!
If you think of Muslims like retarded children,then it begins to make sense.Sweden considers Swedes to be adults,humans and therefore subject to punishment when they screw up...If Muslims are like retarded children,they are not held to the same beliefs that Swedes have for their white population..It is the same for American libs who give blacks a pass on Murdering whites...
Purple hair. Lesbians. Gays/trannies. Pajama boys. Tattoos. Loony leftists who would send their own rapists a box of candy afterward.
Islamic rapists need hugs.
So the Christians-in-name-only are making it easy for their replacements to feel right at home.
Aptly named, “Stockholm Syndrome”
I notice that most of the women are unattractive. It's possible they LIKE the idea of horny, "manly", high-testosterone men coming in and being desperate enough to want them. Perhaps a similar dynamic to suburban girls taking up with "inner city" thugs.
And here's the antidote...
It wasn’t “rape” rape.
Sad that I share a common ancestry with such fools.
I think it is inaccurate to describe their comments as “defending Muslim rapists”. These people do not represent all Swedes. The video-maker found people there, just like it is easy to do anywhere in the US, who will give a provocative or stupid response to a question.
In this case, the ones being interviewed reject the idea that the problem is with Islam or allowing too many Muslim immigrants into the country. None of those interviewed minimized the seriousness of the crimes of mass rapes. They simply failed to recognize the connection between Sweden’s immigration policy and these crimes.
Fortunately, there are still enough people in this nation who reject the liberal cultural-equivalency doctrine, and the false labels of racism and xenophobia, in order to elect someone with common sense like Donald Trump.
A common sense approach to immigration will prevent mass murder and mass rapes from happening here.
See How the Feminists’ “War against Boys” Paved the Way for Islam https://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1300
Some commentators like to point out that many of the most passionate and bravest defenders of the West are women, citing Italian writer Oriana Fallaci and others as examples. But women like Ms. Fallaci, brave as they might be, are not representative of all Western women. If you look closely, you will notice that, on average, Western women are actually more supportive of Multiculturalism and massive immigration than are Western men.
...
The standard explanation in my country for this gender gap in voting patterns is that men are more “xenophobic and selfish” than women, who are more open-minded and possess a greater ability to show solidarity with outsiders. That’s one possibility. Another one is that men traditionally have had the responsibility for protecting the “tribe” and spotting an enemy, a necessity in a dog-eat-dog world. Women are more naïve, and less willing to rationally think through the long-term consequences of avoiding confrontation or dealing with unpleasant realities now.
...
It is correct, as feminists claim, that a hyper-feminine society is not as destructive as a hyper-masculine society. The catch with a too soft society is that it is unsustainable. It will get squashed as soon as it is confronted by more traditional, aggressive ones. Instead of “having it all,” Western women risk losing everything. What are liberal feminists going to do when faced with aggressive gang of Muslim youngsters? Burn their bras and throw the pocket edition of the Vagina Monologues at them?
Perhaps women can succeed in turning their men into doormats, but it will be on the cost of doing so to their nation and to their civilization as well. According to Italian American feminist Camille Paglia, “If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts.” That may be an exaggeration, but male energy is definitely a driving force in any dynamic culture.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.