Posted on 12/15/2016 7:01:50 PM PST by Kaslin
RUSH: Judge Napolitano has dropped a bomb. Andrew Napolitano, the adult Eddie Munster I affectionately refer to him as. You remember Eddie Munster? Well, Judge Napolitano is the adult Eddie Munster. Anyway, he was on Fox & Friends today, and he said that it is in fact U.S. intelligence agents themselves who are responsible for leaking all this stuff to WikiLeaks, not the Russians.
He said: "United States intelligence agents who did not want this woman in charge of the federal government and exposing more agents and resources and undercover assets in the Middle East," that they did it. Now, let's stop and examine that for a minute. Here is Hillary Clinton, who made a total mess of Benghazi, who did not come to the aid of CIA agents who were protecting the annex there.
She has a reputation for disrespecting military people in the White House, Marines, other uniformed personnel throughout the time she's been first lady and up at the State Department level. So Judge Napolitano says, hey, it's the CIA that didn't want this woman anywhere near the White House. She's a security risk herself. I mean, this is a woman who claimed that she had to dodge sniper fire landing in Afghanistan one time. So let's just throw that in the mix.
Then the U.K. Daily Mail story: "Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did not provide Clinton emails," to WikiLeaks. That, in fact, "they were handed over to him," an ex-British ambassador, "at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers."
When this all settles in, wouldn't it just be the most delicious irony of all if it was, in fact, Democrat whistleblowers who had no desire for Hillary Clinton to get anywhere near the Oval Office who were doing the leaking and the, quote/unquote, "sabotage"? Wouldn't that just be delicious, folks? And I wouldn't discount the possibility.
Two sources now alleging to it, and I wouldn't doubt it at all, when the media gets on a narrative and runs with it like they are this Russian business, I guarantee you, guarantee you it's very possible this is nowhere near what really happened.
END TRANSCRIPT
Napolitano keeps coming up with stuff that doesn’t connect. I blew him off over the FBI agents quitting.
More believable than the Russian fairy tale they keep pushing.
Julian Assange affirmed on Hannity’s radio show that it wasn’t the Russians.
I heard “Assange” on Hannity today. He certainly has an Australian accent, but it didn’t really sound like him to me? I still want to see the guy in the flesh. I wish someone who knew how to do it, would run a voice comparison of an older Assange tape and today’s tape.
You want us to believe that the DNC has people hiding within that actually love America enough to throw Hillary under the bus and prevent Obama’s third term by proxy?
I’m not sure if they actually love America, but yes, some in the democrat party, especially in intelligence, dislike Hillary enough to do this.
I’ve thought it was an inside job ever since the first few times the question “whodunnit” was asked of the wikileaks emails.
And remember the videos by the intelligence guy Piscenick (SP). This is really close to what he was implying. People within the intelligence department handing data to Wikileaks is almost exactly what he said...a number of concerned individuals inside the intelligence community who don’t want to see Hillary set foot inside the White House. He never did say they were all republicans, or even conservatives. Just intelligence people.
Maybe more about hating hillary than loving America. She screwed over the bernies
I thought Paul Ryan was the adult Eddie Munster?
And Assange said as we know that it was Podesta that released Podesta’s emails when he fell for a phising email.
And Assange said as we know that it was Podesta that released Podesta’s emails when he fell for a phising email.
Hannity's interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FuQwedAWHI
There is plenty of prior Assange audio. For instance, here he was in July 2014:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVMe9bdrau4&t=1m42s
You'll just have to listen and decide.
from what I can tell, these are two different events..
1- the phishing incident where Podesta gave away the ghost.
2- russian state agents probing their potential opposition.
aside from those two totally separate daily events, there is nothing that connects the two. Phishing is performed by people that want to blackmail or just scam credit card info for a quick buck. Most originate outside the US in places east of here.
State snooping is something that all countries do and they don’t advertise or sell the idea they have access so as to keep that pipeline open.
aside from that, there was no attempt to switch votes or to promote one candidate over another.
This entire media storm is nothing but a disinformation campaign directed by the white house.
Maybe they aren’t patriotic, but they are supporters of Bernie Sanders who hate Clinton for rigging the primary against him.
Still more logical than "The Russians did it!"
You nailed it! The commies breaking with the socialists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.