Skip to comments.The Neoconís declaration of war against Trump
Posted on 01/12/2017 12:32:15 AM PST by rx
1. The document [that Buzzfeed released] has no letterhead, no identification, no date, no nothing. For many good technical and even legal reasons, sensitive intelligence documents are created with plenty of tracking and identification information. For example, such a document would typically have a reference to the unit which produced it or an number-letter combination indicating the reliability of the source and of the information it contains.
2. The classification CONFIDENTIAL/SENSITIVE SOURCE is a joke. If this was a true document its level of classification would be much, much higher than confidential and since most intelligence documents come from sensitive sources there is no need to specify that.
3.The allegation that The dossier is controlled by Kremlin spokesman, PESKOV, directly on PUTINS orders is beyond laughable. Clearly the author of this fake has no idea how the Russian intelligence and security services work (hint: the Presidential spokesman has no involvement in that whatsoever)
4. On page 2 there is this other hilarious sentence exploit TRUMPs personal obsession and sexual perversion in order to obtain suitable kompromat (compromising material) on him. Nobody in a real intelligence document would bother to clarify what the word kompromat means since both in Russian and in English it is obviously the combination of the words compromising and materials.
This does not make this document any less dangerous, however.
First, and this is the really crucial part, there is more than enough here to impeach Trump on numerous grounds both political and legal. Let me repeat again this is an attempt at removing Donald Trump from the White House. This is a political coup detat.
(Excerpt) Read more at thesaker.is ...
I think it was yesterday that I posted the question if they were trying to set him up to be a Manchurian Candidate to stop him from taking office.
They are certainly not going to quit after he takes the oath. Pray for Trump and our Republic.
But what makes these guys so-called neo cons?
Buzz Feed was duped. This has been known for over 24 hours and the Sh*tballs who call themselves the MSM refuse to acknowledge that fact.
And how would the Form of Government that Trump represents be destructive of the ends laid forth by the Constitution, especially as it follows upon the most Constitution-destroying Administration our US of A has ever seen?
Indeed, such a right is a Right of The People, not the neocons, uniparty (Third Way), NWO, Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Chicago Mob or New York Mob.
So far, their shots are ricocheting and hitting themselves.
“A7! I sunk my battleship!”
“Um, that’s not how it . . . you know what? Carry on.”
Arrogance is their Achilles Heel. They over-estimate the stupidity of us little folk. As a result, they're doing stuff now that's not hidden enough.
So, what we have here is a fake intel document that was included in the info for DJT, but not presented. The reason for that had to be because they knew that someone who had access to the intel would leak it to the media. Wow.
Add to that, there's speculation (is it proved yet?) that at some point Insane McCain was involved with this document. He and anyone else involved with the chain getting top secret intel (fake or actual) leaked to the media should be charged with sedition. Tried. Convicted. Spend the rest of their traitorous lives in jail.
Am I being too dramatic in saying that what's going on is beyond comprehension? Many of us hypothesized an Illuminati, a Global Elite that controls things, an Invisible Hand, a rogue gov that has taken over. Did anyone realize how out of control it is?
I hope that DJT is setting up, or has set up, private intel until the Intel Swamp is drained.
I come from a Paleo-con family.
Because the originators of neoconservatism (Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Michael Novak, etc) were once leftists. They grew up as leftists, became disillusioned with left politics in the late 1960s, and began searching for compromise positions between their former leftism and traditional conservatism.
The term “neoconservative” was actually coined by the socialist Michael Harrington. It was a disparaging term, similar to the way leftists use “neoliberal” today. The leading neoconservatives took the epithet as a badge of honor as they moved further from left circles.
Until the late 90s, neoconservatism was primarily a cultural critique (Roger Kimball is a present-day example). The cultural critique has been largely forgotten, and the term has come to mean an interventionist, pro-democracy foreign policy.
Exactly. This is an attempted bloodless (so far) coup.
Not “neocons”, bare faced progressive democrats.
“It’s just sex” “Quoth the Raven, Donald Trump.”
If it was no big deal when BJ was accused of rape, why is this so worrisome for the libs?
“But what makes these guys so-called neo cons?”
I have noticed a few attempts from the left (and some anti-Trumpers) to redefine this word, as liberals so like to do with so much of the English language.
At the beginning of GW’s 1st term people self described as “kinder gentler conservatives”. Detractors used the term as code for “Jewish conservatives”. Period.
I always wondered whether McCain was brainwashed or near brainwashed by the Communist when he was a POW. When he attacked his rival Romney, he sounded akin to a Bolshevik talking about the mean businessman who runs over widows and orphans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.