Its hard to get in tune with the author’s positions when from the onset he erects a false premise. I believe it is the author who fails to understand the true face of evil.
Obama fits every facet of the definition: profoundly immoral and malevolent; wickedness, and depravity; harmful; injurious; characterized or accompanied by misfortune or suffering; unfortunate; disastrous; marked by anger, irritability, irascibility, etc. The author seems to suffer from the prevalent idea that society must understand & not judge. Obama with his pen & drones is far more than an immoral man of inaction and should be judged by his actions & the effects of his actions.
>>Its hard to get in tune with the author’s positions when from the onset he erects a false premise. I believe it is the author who fails to understand the true face of evil.
>>Obama fits every facet of the definition: profoundly immoral and malevolent; wickedness, and depravity; harmful; injurious; characterized or accompanied by misfortune or suffering; unfortunate; disastrous; marked by anger, irritability, irascibility, etc. The author seems to suffer from the prevalent idea that society must understand & not judge. Obama with his pen & drones is far more than an immoral man of inaction and should be judged by his actions & the effects of his actions.
Exactly. The author is misguidedly trying to be kind or give the benefit of the doubt. I have no doubts about 0vomit.